Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

3.88s

  • IN THE MATTER OF THE VERIFIED PETITION OF THE RETAIL ENERGY SUPPLY ASSOCIATION, ETC. (NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 2021

    See, e.g., Saccone v. Bd. of Trs. of Police & Firemen's Ret. … However, our function as an appellate court is to review the decision of the Board, not to decide the legal issue tabula rasa. See Zirger v. Gen. Accident Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vedutis v. Tesi

    135 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 1975

    Builders, etc., Ass'n v. … Here, as in Markey v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Itzen & Robertson v. Bd. of Health of Oakland

    89 N.J. Super. 374 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 1965

    See also Zullo v. Board of Health, Woodbridge Twp., 9 N.J. 431 (1952). … In Zullo v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Danisi v. Thuemling

    72 N.J. Super. 118 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1962

    Super. 118 (1962) 178 A.2d 26 JOSEPH DANISI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWIN J. THUEMLING AND ELDON E. BETTS, DEFENDANTS, AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … Defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (hereinafter called the Board) appeals from an order directing it to pay $4,625.75 to plaintiff on account of a judgment obtained by plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Bd. of Education of City of Englewood

    150 N.J. Super. 265 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 1977

    Super. 265 (1977) 375 A.2d 669 IN THE MATTER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ENGLEWOOD TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … negotiation agreement or the dictates of Donaldson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Township of Fairfield v. Likanchuk's

    274 N.J. Super. 320 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1994

    Urban v. Planning Board of Manasquan, 124 N.J. 651, 656 , 592 A. 2d 240 (1991). … The Jantausch principles were applied in Hill v. Board of Adjust. Borough of Eatontown, 122 N.J.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • LATOYA HENDRICKS VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 2021

    BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and PSKW, LLC, Respondents. ________________________ Submitted April 19, 2021 – Decided May 13, 2021 Before Judges Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida … (quoting Charatan v. Bd. of Rev., 200 N.J. Super. 74, 79 (App. Div. 1985)). "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, [we] are obliged to accept them.'" Ibid. (quoting Self v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Caltavuturo v. Passaic

    124 N.J. Super. 361 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 1973

    Latzoni v. Garfield, 22 N.J. 84, 92 (1956); Harpell v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, 20 N.J. 309, 316 (1956). … See Coleman v. Edison Tp., 95 N.J. Super. 600, 605 (App. Div. 1967). We find Fahey v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Terry v. Harris

    175 N.J. Super. 482 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1980

    Welfare Bd. v. Hellams, 103 N.J. … Bak-A-Lum Corp. v. Alcoa Building Prod., 69 N.J. 123, 131 (1976); Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson Cty. Park Comm'n, 71 N.J. 145 (1976); Corallo v. Essex Cty. Welfare Bd., 140 N.J. Super. 414 (App.Div. 1976).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Bacon v. New Jersey State Department of Education

    398 N.J. Super. 600 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 2008

    Burke, 119 N.J. 287, 385-86 , 575 A.2d 359 (1990) (Abbott II); Abbott v. Burke, 149 N.J. 145 , 155 n. 3, 693 A.2d 417 (1997) (Abbott IV); Abbott v. … See, e.g., Robinson v. Cahill, 63 N.J. 196, 197-98 , 306 A.2d 65 (Robinson II), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 292 , 38 L.Ed.2d 219 (1973); Robinson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mt. Hill, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Township of Middletown

    403 N.J. Super. 146 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 10, 2008

    V. … Angel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baldwin Const. Co. v. Essex Co. Bd. of Taxation

    32 N.J. Super. 18 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 20, 1954

    Super. 18 (1954) 107 A.2d 567 BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS, v. ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGE, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … The cases have been before the courts, and in Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 21 N.J.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Donaldson v. BD. OF ED. OF NORTH WILDWOOD

    115 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1971

    DONALDSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD, CAPE MAY COUNTY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 8, 1971. … Zimmerman v. Board of Education, Newark, 38 N.J. 65 (1962), is dispositive of this issue.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Council of Private Schools v. Cooperman

    205 N.J. Super. 544 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 27, 1985

    We may not upset that determination because it was reasonably made in the exercise of authority the Legislature has given the State Board. See Campbell v. Dept. of Civil Service, 39 N.J. 556, 562 (1963). … Kingsley v. Wes Outdoor Advertising Co., 55 N.J. 336, 339 (1970).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension

    149 N.J. Super. 229 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 1977

    The Board's position is jurisdictional in nature. … Div. 1974), aff'd 66 N.J. 151 (1974); Kochen v. Consolidated Police, etc., Pension Fund Comm'n., 71 N.J. Super. 463, 478 (App. Div. 1962).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • LP v. Edison Bd. of Educ.

    265 N.J. Super. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 1993

    See, N.J.A.C. 6:28-2.7(g); see also, C.S. v. Middletown Township Board of Education, 259 N.J. … Sec. 1415 (e)(2); Lascari v. Board of Educ. 116 N.J. 30, 37 , 560 A. 2d 1180 (1989); C.S. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • River Vale v. E & R OFF. INTERIORS

    241 N.J. Super. 391 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1990

    Super. 391 (1990) 575 A.2d 55 RIVER VALE PLANNING BOARD AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RIVER VALE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … Under these circumstances, the board may, if it desires, rescind the site plan approval and variance. Cf. Costanza & Bertolino, Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • TUBE BAR, INC. v. Commuters Bar, Inc.

    18 N.J. Super. 351 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 1952

    of the ordinance authorizing such grant or denial. 9 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3 d ed. 1950), § 26.73; Bohan v. … Nor can such commission, board, body or person set aside, disregard or suspend the terms of the ordinance, except in some manner prescribed by law. Public Service Ry. Co. v. Hackensack Imp. Com., 6 N.J. Misc. 15 ( Sup.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Structure Bldg. Corp. v. Abella

    377 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 2005

    LoBiondo v. Schwartz, 323 N.J.Super. 391 , 733 A. 2d 516 (App.Div.1999), certif. denied, 162 N.J. 488 , 744 A. 2d 1211 (1999); Fraser v. … Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 142 N.J. 520, 539-540 , 666 A. 2d 146 (1995); Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 73-75 , 110 A. 2d 24 (1954).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Barnett

    101 N.J. Eq. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 21, 1927

    It was so held by Chancellor Runyon in Brown v. Ryder, 42 N.J. Eq. 356 . In that case an appeal to this court was taken from a decree of the orphans court admitting to probate the will of Brown, deceased. … In Brown v. Ryder, supra , the orphans court, upon admitting the will to probate, granted letters testamentary and the executor qualified, and on an appeal and affirmance the cause was remitted. Osborn v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.