Case law

In Re Malone

381 N.J. Super. 344 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 2005

The Board contends that its decision in this matter should be accorded substantial deference and not reversed unless it is arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or unsupported by credible evidence in the record. Brady v. … Further, we disagree with the Board's rejection of the additional information about billing rates that Mr. Wallach submitted to the Board at its request. The Board criticized Mr.

Household Finance Corp. v. Gaffney

20 N.J. Super. 394 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 1952

Board of Public Utility Comm'rs., 105 N.J.L. 28 ( Sup. Ct. 1928), the board refused to approve a permit granted the prosecutor by South Orange to operate buses along a certain route. … Family Finance Co. v. Gough , above. There is no mandate here as in Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v.

Terry v. Harris

175 N.J. Super. 482 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1980

Welfare Bd. v. Hellams, 103 N.J. … Bak-A-Lum Corp. v. Alcoa Building Prod., 69 N.J. 123, 131 (1976); Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson Cty. Park Comm'n, 71 N.J. 145 (1976); Corallo v. Essex Cty. Welfare Bd., 140 N.J. Super. 414 (App.Div. 1976).

Walsh Trucking v. Const. Bd. of App.

240 N.J. Super. 525 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1990

In Bell v. Tp. of Bass River, 196 N.J. … He correctly viewed a county board as having "only local jurisdiction," relying on Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 27 N.J.

Mueller v. Mueller

95 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1967

A judgment of divorce from bed and board (limited divorce) is not a true divorce since it does not dissolve the bonds of matrimony but merely decrees a judicial separation. Rudin v. Rudin, 104 N.J. Eq. 524 ( Ch. 1929). … Our Supreme Court, in Lavino v.

Tharpe v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPT.

261 N.J. Super. 401 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 1992

We do not quarrel with the Board's long-standing interpretation of its powers. See Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 561 , 362 A. 2d 13 (1976); Pringle v. N.J. … Instead, our concern is with the failure of the Board to state its reasons with sufficient particularity. See Matter of Vey, 124 N.J. 534, 544 , 591 A. 2d 1333 (1991); Van Holten Group v.

Transport of New Jersey v. Watler

161 N.J. Super. 453 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 1978

The Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (the Board) appeals from an order to pay $2,063.30 from the Fund on account of a judgment 1 entered against defendant Watler for property damage inflicted upon plaintiff’s bus … The Board did not raise the issue of insurance coverage in defense of the order to pay. N. J. S.

Mt. Hill, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Township of Middletown

403 N.J. Super. 146 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 10, 2008

V. … Angel v.

Costello v. Porzelt

116 N.J. Super. 380 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 1, 1971

The leading case is Ysern v. Horter, 91 N.J. Eq. 189 (Ch. 1920), recognized and applied in Akrep v. Akrep, 1 N.J. 268, 270 (1949); Brown v. Brown, 34 N.J. Super. 261, 265 (Ch. Div. 1954). … Pisciotta v. Buccino, supra .

ROYAL BRADLEY v. Bradley Beach Bor.

252 N.J. Super. 401 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1991

To the same effect, see Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488, 493 , 70 A. 2d 733 (1950). … Hydro Power Partners v. Clifton, 11 N.J. Tax 12, 21 (1990). The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Sprint Spectrum, LP v. ZON. BD.

360 N.J. Super. 373 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 2003

IV Judicial review of a zoning board's decision is ordinarily limited. Ocean County Cellular Tel. Co. v. … Corp. v.

In Re Battle Petition

190 N.J. Super. 232 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1983

Sharrock v. Keansburg, 15 N.J. Super. 11, 16 (App.Div. 1951). … Wene v. Meyner, supra, 13 N.J. at 196 . In DeFlesco v. Mercer Cty. Bd. of Elections, 43 N.J.

Jacobs v. Martin

20 N.J. Super. 531 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 1952

Hayman v. Galveston, 273 U.S. 414 , 47 S.Ct. 363 , 71 L.Ed. 714 (1927); Findlay v. Board of Supervisors of County of Mohave, 72 Ariz. 58 , 230 P. 2 d 526 ( Sup. Ct. 1951); Newton v. … Board of Commissioners of Weld County, 86 Colo. 446 , 282 P. 1068 ( Sup. Ct. 1929); Richardson v. City of Miami, 144 Fla. 294 , 198 So. 51 ( Sup. Ct. 1940); City of Miami v. Oates, 152 Fla. 21 , 10 So. 2 d 721 ( Sup.

STATE DEP v. Middlesex Cty. Freeholders Bd.

206 N.J. Super. 414 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1985

MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS AND HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, DEFENDANTS, v. … DeSapio, Hunterdon County Counsel, for defendant Hunterdon County Board of Chosen Freeholders. Frank T. Koserowski for defendant Hudson County Board of Chosen Freeholders ( Joseph V.

Clark v. Pomponio

397 N.J. Super. 630 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 2008

Brown v. Brown, 348 N.J.Super. 466, 475 , 792 A. 2d 463 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 174 N.J. 193 , 803 A. 2d 1164 (2002). When fixing final alimony awards, the equitable distribution of property must be considered. … Brown, supra, 348 N.J.Super. at 475 , 792 A. 2d 463 (recognizing the interrelationship of child support and other financial issues). V.

Ellin Corp. v. Township of North Bergen

253 N.J. Super. 434 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1992

Ellin Corp. requested a hearing before the North Bergen Senior Citizens and Disabled Persons Condominium Cooperative Conversion Protection Board (the Board). The Board upheld the administrator’s determination. … This resulted in the Law Division judge’s determination which upheld the Board’s action.

Danisi v. Thuemling

72 N.J. Super. 118 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1962

Super. 118 (1962) 178 A.2d 26 JOSEPH DANISI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWIN J. THUEMLING AND ELDON E. BETTS, DEFENDANTS, AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … Defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (hereinafter called the Board) appeals from an order directing it to pay $4,625.75 to plaintiff on account of a judgment obtained by plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident

Rothman v. Borough of River Edge

149 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 1977

Union Terminal Cold Storage Co. v. Spence, 17 N.J. 162, 167 (1954); Boy's Club of Clifton, Inc. v. Jefferson Tp., 72 N.J. 389, 405 (1977). … N.J.S.A. 54:5-6; Bea v. Turner & Co., 115 N.J. Eq. 189, 192 (Ch. 1934); In re Taylor, 30 N.J. Super. 65, 69 (Cty. Ct. 1954); Bonnet v. State, 141 N.J. Super. 177, 278 (Law Div. 1976).

Rotondo v. Carlstadt-East Rutherford Regional High School District

276 N.J. Super. 36 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 10, 1994

VIII, § IV, ¶ 1; Robinson v. Cahill (I), 62 N.J. 473, 509 , 303 A.2d 273 (1973); Board of Educ. of Elizabeth v. … That substitution was made against the background of De Ferrari v. Board of Educ. of Secaucus, 1979 S.L.D. 494, and Cardman v. Board of Educ. of Millburn, 1977 S.L.D. 746.

NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc.

144 N.J. Super. 411 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1976

The Association contends that its action is one of mandamus seeking this court to order the Board to undertake proceedings which will result in a decision or action which is final. Garrou v. … Jackson v. Lindsay, North American Ins. Co. v.