Case law

Costello v. Porzelt

116 N.J. Super. 380 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 1, 1971

The leading case is Ysern v. Horter, 91 N.J. Eq. 189 (Ch. 1920), recognized and applied in Akrep v. Akrep, 1 N.J. 268, 270 (1949); Brown v. Brown, 34 N.J. Super. 261, 265 (Ch. Div. 1954). … Pisciotta v. Buccino, supra .

Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.

356 N.J. Super. 194 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 24, 2002

Kramer v. Board of Adjustment of Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 296 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965). … Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Board of Hamilton Township, supra, 92 N.J. at 478 , 457 A.2d 441 .

Mueller v. Mueller

95 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1967

A judgment of divorce from bed and board (limited divorce) is not a true divorce since it does not dissolve the bonds of matrimony but merely decrees a judicial separation. Rudin v. Rudin, 104 N.J. Eq. 524 ( Ch. 1929). … Our Supreme Court, in Lavino v.

Maurice River Bd. of Ed. v. Maurice River Tchrs.

187 N.J. Super. 566 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 24, 1982

Super. 566 (1982) 455 A.2d 563 MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, PLAINTIFF, v. MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT. … The prime example is State v.

Walsh Trucking v. Const. Bd. of App.

240 N.J. Super. 525 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1990

In Bell v. Tp. of Bass River, 196 N.J. … He correctly viewed a county board as having "only local jurisdiction," relying on Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 27 N.J.

Passaic v. Kingsley

47 N.J. Super. 265 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 31, 1957

Super. 265 (1957) 135 A.2d 877 CITY OF PASSAIC, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. … Bailey v. Council of the Division of Planning, 22 N.J. 366, 373 (1956); Carls v. Civil Service Commission, 17 N.J. 215, 219, 220 (1955).

STATE DEP v. Middlesex Cty. Freeholders Bd.

206 N.J. Super. 414 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1985

MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS AND HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, DEFENDANTS, v. … DeSapio, Hunterdon County Counsel, for defendant Hunterdon County Board of Chosen Freeholders. Frank T. Koserowski for defendant Hudson County Board of Chosen Freeholders ( Joseph V.

Centennial Land & Dev. Co. v. Tp. of Medford

165 N.J. Super. 220 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 1979

Kotlorich v. Ramsey, 51 N.J. Super. 520 (App. Div. 1958); Kurowski v. Bayonne Board of Adj., 11 N.J. Super. 433 (App. Div. 1951); Robinson v. Cape May Bd. of Adj., 131 N.J. … Most recently, *227 Civil Service Board and Public Service Board officials have been found to be entitled to some immunity. Davis v. Nuss, 432 F. Supp. 44 (S.D. Tex. 1977); Condosta v. Vermont Elec. Co-Op Inc., 400 F.

In Re Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Anna Filo

9 N.J. Super. 146 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 12, 1950

Clifton v. Clifton, 47 N.J. Eq. 227 , 21 A. 333 ( Prerog. 1890); Bennett v. Bennett, 50 N.J. … Wheeler v. Whipple, 44 N.J. Eq. 141 , 14 A. 275 ( Prerog. 1888); affirmed, 45 N.J. Eq. 367 , 19 A. 621 ( E. & A. 1889); Loveridge v. Brown, 98 N.J. Eq. 381, 388 , 129 A. 131 ( E. & A. 1925); In re Heim, 136 N.J.

In Re Application of Marion Bus Transp. Co.

53 N.J. Super. 308 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 29, 1958

Fornarotta v. Board of Public Utility Comm., 105 N.J.L. 28, 33 ( Sup. Ct. 1928). In Zachariae v. Division of New Jersey Real Estate Commission, 53 N.J. Super. 60, 62 ( App. … Gross v.

Trevorrow v. Boyer

52 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1958

TREVORROW, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. RALPH RICHARD BOYER, DEFENDANT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … In Moore v.

Santiago v. New York & New Jersey Port Authority

429 N.J. Super. 150 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 5, 2012

Brown v. Port Auth. Police Superior Officers Ass’n, 283 N.J.Super. 122, 130 , 661 A.2d 312 (App.Div.1995) (citing Hess v. Port Auth. … Brown, supra, 283 N.J.Super. at 133 , 661 A.2d 312 .

Capasso v. L. Pucillo & Sons, Inc.

132 N.J. Super. 473 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 28, 1974

As the court said in Henninger v. Bergen Cty. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 3 N. J. 68 (1949) : s- * * Repeals by implication are not favored in the law. … Pucillo had not filed a schedule of tariffs and charges with the board, let alone having the schedule approved by the board.

FMC Stores Co. v. Boro. of Morris Plains

195 N.J. Super. 373 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 1984

This county board practice has been recently confirmed by the amendments of N.J.A.C. 18:12A-1.6 and 1.20, which prohibit the county board from accepting a cross-petition after the expiration of the statutory period. … Violent Crimes Compensation Board, 76 N.J. 368 (1978), we do not here consider its availability as a tolling mechanism of the statutory time periods. Compare Horrobin v. Taxation Division Director, 172 N.J.

Keyes Elec. Service v. FREEHOLDERS OF CUMBERLAND

15 N.J. Super. 178 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 1951

Super. 178 (1951) 83 A.2d 61 KEYES ELECTRICAL SERVICE, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND AND WILLIAM E. SNELL, DEFENDANTS. … Ryan v. Paterson, 66 N.J.L. 533 , 49 A. 587 * * *.

Patel v. Soriano

369 N.J. Super. 192 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 2004

and the board of trustees. … Urdinaran v. Aarons, 115 F.Supp. 2d 484, 488 (D.N.J.2000). Such a proof must be made by direct or circumstantial evidence that tends to prove a common scheme designed to achieve an unlawful objective. Brown v.

Caldwell-W. Caldwell v. Caldwell-W. Caldwell Bd.

180 N.J. Super. 440 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 7, 1981

Super. 440 (1981) 435 A.2d 562 CALDWELL-WEST CALDWELL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, CHARGING PARTY-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. … Bd. of Ed. v. Galloway Tp. Ass'n of Ed. Sec'ts, 78 N.J. 1, 16 (1978).

Clary v. Borough of Eatontown

41 N.J. Super. 47 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1956

Pierro v. Baxendale, 20 N.J. 17, 26 (1955); Cobble Close Farm v. Board of Adjustment, Middletown Township, 10 N.J. 442, 451 (1952). … Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, supra ( 3 N.J., at page 209 ).

Hammond v. Monmouth Cty. Sheriff's Dept.

317 N.J. Super. 199 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 1999

This argument is premised upon the de novo nature of the hearing before the Board, East Paterson v. … N.J.S.A. 11A:2-13, -14, -15; City of *747 Orange v. DeStefano, 48 N.J.Super. 407, 419-20 , 137 A. 2d 593 (App.Div.1958). The Board, in its statement in lieu of brief, offers Cliff v.

Glen Rock, Etc. v. Bd. of Adjust., Etc., Glen Rock

80 N.J. Super. 79 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 1963

Super. 79 (1963) 192 A.2d 865 GLEN ROCK REALTY CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. … The flexibility of the zoning laws permit relief to such aggrieved individual owners by application to the board of adjustment for a variance. N.J.S.A. 40:55-39, Fischer v. Bedminster, 11 N.J. 194 (1952)."