Case law

Gerardo v. NJ State Parole Bd.

221 N.J. Super. 442 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1987

This is so because the Board's parole decisions are often highly predictive and subjective. Beckworth v. N.J. Parole Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 358-59 (1973). … See O'Neal v. N.J. State Parole Bd., supra, 149 N.J. Super. at 186 (Board's reliance on hearsay police reports upheld).

Higg-A-Rella, Inc. v. County of Essex

276 N.J. Super. 183 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 23, 1994

BLAU, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … Cf., Atlantic City Convention Center Authority v.

STEPHEN STANZIANO v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 2022

Corvelli v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 130 N.J. 539, 550 (1992) (quoting Uricoli v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. … Winters v. N. Hudson Reg'l Fire & Rescue, 212 N.J. 67, 87 (2012) (alteration in original) (internal citation omitted) (first quoting Hennessey v.

In re Adoption of Regulations for Electrical Inspection Authorities

127 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1974

J. v. Bd. of Examiners, Elec. Contr’rs, etc. 48 N. J. 413 (1967) and Independent Electricians, etc., Ass’n of N. J. v. N. J. Bd. of Examiners, etc., 54 N. J. 466 (1969). … J. v. N. J. Bd. of Examiners, etc., 54 N. J. 466, 482-483 (1969); see also, State v. Hotel Bar Foods, 18 N. J. 115 (1955); Male v. Renda Contracting Co., Inc., 64 N. J. 199, 201 (1974).

State v. Kobrin Securities, Inc.

221 N.J. Super. 169 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1987

Kobrin, Fitzsimmons, Repace, Brown, Berman and Calcutta was denied. … Defendant Brown further urges that B.

Buchanan v. Essex County Welfare Bd.

117 N.J. Super. 541 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 28, 1971

King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309, 316 , 88 S.Ct. 2128 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1968). … King v. Smith, supra, 392 U.S. at 318 , 88 S.Ct. at 2128 .

Cos-Lin, Inc. v. Spring Lake Bd. of Adjustment

221 N.J. Super. 148 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 1987

The Board's resolution of denial specifically relied on our case law on the extension or expansion of nonconforming uses, citing Belleville v. Parrillo's Inc., 83 N.J. 309 (1980); Grundlehner v. … Super. at 136 , and also Weyls v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Trumbull, 161 Conn. 516 , 290 A. 2d 350 (1971).

State v. Watson

183 N.J. Super. 481 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1982

See Brown v. Brown, 218 Kan. 34 , 542 P. 2d 332, 334-335 (Sup.Ct. 1975); Harris Baking Co. v. Mazzeo, 294 A. 2d 445, 453 (Me.Sup.Jud.Ct. 1972); Eastgate Associates v. … See State v. Ryan, 86 N.J. 1 (1981), cert. den. ___ U.S. ___, 102 S.Ct. 363 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 191 (1981). But cf. United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117 , 101 S.Ct. 426 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 328 (1980).

Estate of Terminelli v. Police & Firemen's Retirement System

290 N.J. Super. 231 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 14, 1996

In Kane v. … Neither the Board nor we are free to construe liberally the death benefits statute. See Mazza v. Board of Trustees, 143 N.J. 22, 24, 25 , 667 A.2d 1052 (1995).

Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen Cty. Bd. of Taxation

62 N.J. Super. 133 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1960

In the case of Carow v. Board of Education of City of New York, 272 N.Y. 341 , 6 N.E. 2 d 47 ( Ct. … In the case of State Board of Assessors v. Central R.R.

Della Vecchia v. World Scope Publishing Co.

64 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 1960

In Hutton v. City of Camden, supra , the board of health had a meeting and without giving notice to the plaintiff thereupon declared plaintiff's lot a nuisance. … Such, too, is the holding of Meaney v. Keating, supra . New York's jurisdiction, however, is not exclusive. In Buccheri v.

PDM CONSTRUCTION CORP. v. Welsh

89 N.J. Super. 460 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 5, 1965

CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. HUGH W. WELSH, ACTING BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWN OF BELLEVILLE AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF BELLEVILLE, DEFENDANTS. … , and it relies on Pierro v.

State v. DR

214 N.J. Super. 278 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1986

Accord: Brown v. United States, 152 F. 2d 138 (D.C. Cir.1945); Smith v. United States, 215 F. 2d 682, 683 (D.C. Cir.1954); Commonwealth v. Haber, 351 Pa.Super. 79 , 505 A. 2d 273, 274-276 (Super. 1986); Oldham v. … State v. Brooks, 201 N.J. Super. 10, 17-18 (App.Div. 1985); and see Rutherford Educ. Ass'n v. Board of Educ., 99 N.J. 8, 20-27 (1985), for a general discussion of retroactive effects of judicial decisions.

In Re Bd. of Education of City of Englewood

150 N.J. Super. 265 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 1977

Super. 265 (1977) 375 A.2d 669 IN THE MATTER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ENGLEWOOD TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … negotiation agreement or the dictates of Donaldson v.

In Re Central Railroad Co. of NJ

29 N.J. Super. 32 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 21, 1953

Co. v. Bd. of Pub. Utility Com'rs., 11 N.J. 43, 51 (1952); Penna.-Reading S.S. Lines v. Bd. of Pub. Utility Com'rs., 5 N.J. 114 (1950). … We agree with appellants that there must be sufficient or substantial evidence to support the orders of the Board. Central R.R. Co. v. Dept. of Pub. Ut., 7 N.J. 247 (1951); cf.

Terry v. Harris

175 N.J. Super. 482 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1980

Welfare Bd. v. Hellams, 103 N.J. … Bak-A-Lum Corp. v. Alcoa Building Prod., 69 N.J. 123, 131 (1976); Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson Cty. Park Comm'n, 71 N.J. 145 (1976); Corallo v. Essex Cty. Welfare Bd., 140 N.J. Super. 414 (App.Div. 1976).

Tharpe v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPT.

261 N.J. Super. 401 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 1992

We do not quarrel with the Board's long-standing interpretation of its powers. See Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 561 , 362 A. 2d 13 (1976); Pringle v. N.J. … Instead, our concern is with the failure of the Board to state its reasons with sufficient particularity. See Matter of Vey, 124 N.J. 534, 544 , 591 A. 2d 1333 (1991); Van Holten Group v.

Transport of New Jersey v. Watler

161 N.J. Super. 453 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 1978

The Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (the Board) appeals from an order to pay $2,063.30 from the Fund on account of a judgment 1 entered against defendant Watler for property damage inflicted upon plaintiff’s bus … The Board did not raise the issue of insurance coverage in defense of the order to pay. N. J. S.

Mt. Hill, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Township of Middletown

403 N.J. Super. 146 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 10, 2008

V. … Angel v.

ROYAL BRADLEY v. Bradley Beach Bor.

252 N.J. Super. 401 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1991

To the same effect, see Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488, 493 , 70 A. 2d 733 (1950). … Hydro Power Partners v. Clifton, 11 N.J. Tax 12, 21 (1990). The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.