Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.43s

  • Bahrle v. Mirabelli

    107 N.J. Super. 361 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1969

    In Miehl v. Darpino, 53 N. … Board of Education of City of Linden v. Liebman, 56 N. J. Super. 556 (Ch. Div. 1959); Gerendasy v. Police, etc., Pension Comm’n of Elizabeth, 130 N. J. L. 226 (Sup. Ct. 1943); Caronia v. Police, etc.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Banquesource Capital Corp. v. Pine Brook Care Center, Inc.

    265 N.J. Super. 446 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1992

    In Abeles v. … Thereafter, in Van Winkle & Liggett v. G.B.R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brunetti v. MAYOR, COUN., TP. OF MADISON

    130 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 27, 1974

    BRUNETTI, PLAINTIFF, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. August 27, 1974. *165 Mr. Harold G. … Denial through inaction by the mayor and council, not approval after hearings by the board of adjustment, carries with it the presumption of validity. Wickatunk Village, Inc. v. Marlboro Tp., 118 N.J.

    Criticized by Castroll v. Township of Franklin, 161 N.J. Super. 190 (1978)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Matter of Mallon

    232 N.J. Super. 249 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1989

    See DeFlesco v. Mercer County Board of Elections, 43 N.J. Super. 492, 495-496 (App.Div. 1957); Mulcahy v. Bergen County Board of Elections, supra ( 156 N.J. Super. at 433-434 ). … Super. 232, 236 (App.Div. 1983), mod. 96 N.J. 63 (1984); DeFlesco v. Mercer County Board of Elections, supra ( 43 N.J. Super. at 495 ); Mulcahy v. Bergen County Board of Elections, supra ( 156 N.J. Super. at 434 ).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Lanni v. City of Bayonne

    7 N.J. Super. 169 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1950

    The plaintiff relies on Sommers v. Putnam County Board of Education, 148 N.E. 682 ( Ohio Sup. Ct. 1925). … Woodward, Law of Quasi Contracts, p. 310; Forsyth v. Ganson, 5 Wend. *172 ( N.Y. ) 558, 21 Am. Dec. 241 ; Rundell v. Bentley, 53 Hun ( N.Y. ) 272, 6 N.Y.S. 609 ."

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Heather Holding Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals

    36 N.J. Super. 195 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 14, 1955

    Air-Way Branches, Inc. v. Board of Review, 10 N. J. 609, 614 (1952); see also Kaske v. Board of Review, 34 N. J. Super. 222 (App. Div. 1955), and eases cited at page 226. … Hackensack Water Co. v. Twp. of North Bergen, 8 N. J. Super. 139 (App. Div. 1950). Moreover, putting aside the jurisdictional problem (see Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 28 N. J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chappell v. Comm'r of Education of NJ

    135 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 1975

    Parkview Village Ass'n v. Collingswood, 62 N.J. 21, 34 (1972). See also, Quinlan v. North Bergen Tp. Bd. of Ed. supra . We discern no reason or justification for disturbing them. State v. … As pointed out by the court in Dunellen Bd. of Ed. v. Dunellen Ed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Tavani

    264 N.J. Super. 154 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 29, 1993

    We approach our review of the Board’s two decisions according the Board’s actions a presumption of reasonableness. Smith v. … Smith v. Ricci, supra, 89 N.J. at 525, 446 A.2d 501 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fromm v. BD. DIRECTORS OF POLICE, RETIRE. SYST.

    81 N.J. Super. 138 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 1963

    FROMM, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Considered October 29, 1963. … (at page 42) Plaintiff's reliance upon Bedersky v. Policemen's and Firemen's Pension Board, above, is misplaced.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • S. Brunswick Assoc. v. Tp. Council

    285 N.J. Super. 377 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1994

    Supervisors' review in Thornbury Township Board of Supervisors v. … See also Weiner v. Board of Supervisors of Lower Macungie Township, 119 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Griffith v. Griffith

    185 N.J. Super. 382 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 1982

    Browne for defendant ( Breitenstein & Browne, attorneys). KRAFTE, J.J.D.R.C. (temporarily assigned). … Our Supreme Court, in Painter v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Raymond v. New Jersey State Parole Bd.

    221 N.J. Super. 381 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1987

    opinions in Davis v. … State Parole Board and Martin and Doss v. N.J. State Parole Board (Dockets A-1068-85T6 and A-919-86T6) decided September 2, 1987.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • IRON MT. INFO. MGMT. v. City of Newark

    405 N.J. Super. 599 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 2009

    Super. 599 IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See City of Atlantic City v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Wene

    26 N.J. Super. 363 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 29, 1953

    which was sent to each local board by the county board of elections. … This is a fundamental principle in the law of our State, Burrough v. Branning, 9 N.J.L.J. 110 ( Cir. Ct. 1886); Love v. Board of Freeholders of Hudson County, 35 N.J.L. 269 ( Sup. Ct. 1871).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jordan Developers v. Planning Bd.

    256 N.J. Super. 676 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 4, 1992

    Project v. Kean, 119 N.J. 425 , 575 A. 2d 427 (1990). … N.J.S.A. 40:55D-20; See Kaufmann v. *682 Warren Tp. Planning Bd., 110 N.J. 551, 558 , 542 A. 2d 457 (1988); Cronin v. Township Comm. of Chesterfield, 239 N.J. Super. 611, 618 , 571 A. 2d 1354 (App.Div. 1990); Amato v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Catalano v. Pemberton Tp. Bd. of Adjustment

    60 N.J. Super. 82 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1960

    Oldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., 26 N.J. 246, 262 (1958); McKenna v. New Jersey Highway Authority, 19 N.J. 270, 276 (1955); Holloway v. Pennsauken Tp., 12 N.J. 371, 375 (1953); cf. Thornton v. … Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Summit, 8 N.J. 386, 395 (1952).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • De Muro v. Sullivan

    64 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 1960

    Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark, reported in 119 N. J. L. 537, affirmed on opinion below in 121 N. J. L. 75; McGlynn v. Grosso, 114 N. J. L. 540; Laidlaw v. West Orange in 122 N. J. L. 133; see also Daly v. … See Miller v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, reported in 10 N. J. 398 (1952) ; Mechanics Finance Co. v. Austin, 8 N. J. 577; Lane v. Holderman, 40 N. J. Super. 329; Shelton College v. Borough of Ringwood, 48 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ENID GOLDEN v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 26, 2022

    Div. 1978) and two unpublished cases: Chiappini v. Board of Trustees, No. A- 3983-09 (App. Div. July 29, 2011), and Knox v. Board of Trustees, No. A-1444- 10 (App. Div. Feb. 23, 2012). … In Francois v. Board of Trustees, 415 N.J. Super. 335 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Bator

    395 N.J. Super. 120 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 2007

    In Haggerty *138 v. … See also Barrett v. Union Twp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kaplan v. City of Linwood

    252 N.J. Super. 538 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 14, 1991

    The court should not sit in judgment as to whether the board’s decision was wise and substitute its own judgment for that of the board. Kaufman v. … In citing Levin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.