Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.89s

  • Carroll v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF JERSEY

    15 N.J. Super. 363 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 24, 1951

    THOMAS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND EDWARD J. … Lane v. Bigelow, 135 N.J.L. 195 ( E. & A. 1947); Tzeses v. Barbahenn, 125 N.J.L. 643 ( E. & A. 1941).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Solid Rock Baptist Church v. Carlton

    347 N.J. Super. 180 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 2002

    Moore v. … Board of Trustees, Our Lady of Fatima Chapel, 281 N.J.Super. 459 , 658 A. 2d 327 (Ch.Div.1995) with Church of Christ at Centerville v. Carder, 105 Wash. 2d 204 , 713 P. 2d 101 (1986). In Watson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Reinhardt v. National State Bank

    130 N.J. Eq. 34 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 1941

    Ward v. Kitchen, 30 N.J. Eq. 31 ; Woodruff v. Ward, 35 N.J. Eq. 467 ; Brown v. Brown, 72 N.J. Eq. 667 ; Babbitt v. Fidelity Trust Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 745 , 758 . … They will, of course, be required to exercise the caution of ordinary prudent men in accordance with the principles mentioned in Wild v. Brown, 120 N.J. Eq. 31 , and other cases. *Page 38

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Willoughby v. Wolfson Group, Inc.

    332 N.J. Super. 223 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 2000

    In East Mill Assocs. v. … See Medici v. BPR Co., 107 N.J. 1, 4, 21 , 526 A. 2d 109 (1987).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Oates v. E. Bergen Cty. Mult. List. Serv.

    113 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1971

    of the board. … United States v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In re Final Agency Decision of the Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors

    356 N.J. Super. 42 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 2002

    Ctr. v. Fishman, 167 N.J. 123, 137 , 770 A.2d 233 (2001). … In Palmer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • CFG HEALTH SYS. v. County of Essex

    411 N.J. Super. 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 2010

    Super. 378 CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COUNTY OF ESSEX and Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Essex, Defendants, and Correctional Health Services, LLC, Defendant/Intervenor-Appellant. No. … Partnership v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Atlantic Cty. Bd. Freeholders

    145 N.J. Super. 316 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1976

    These types of liberty interests have been recognized by both the United States Supreme Court in Board of Regent v. … Goss v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Frugis v. Bracigliano

    351 N.J. Super. 328 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2002

    Cowan v. … Caldwell v. Haynes, 136 N.J. 422, 433 , 643 A. 2d 564 (1994); Dombroski v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Frugis v. Bracigliano, 177 N.J. 250 (2003)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Farinich

    179 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1981

    Such cases are exemplified in this State by State v. Brown, 132 N.J. Super. 180 (App.Div. 1975), and State v. Bailey, 97 N.J. … State v. King, 44 N.J. 346, 352 (1965); State v. Brown, 132 N.J. Super. at 184 .

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Randall v. Randall

    14 N.J. Super. 110 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1951

    Kutschinski, 112 Id. 341; Brown v. Brown , Ibid. 600; Blair v. Vetrano, 12 N.J. Mis. R. 462. The reasoning appears sufficiently in Michaelson v. Goldfarb, supra , and Halsey v. Stewart, 4 N.J.L. 366 ." … Halsey v. Stewart, 4 N.J. Law 366; Massey v. Colville, 45 N.J. Law 119; Brown v. Brown, 112 N.J. Eq. 600 . * * * The reason for the rule was stated by Mr.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Passaic Education Ass'n v. Passaic Bd. of Ed.

    166 N.J. Super. 250 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 25, 1977

    Super. 250 (1977) 399 A.2d 980 EDUCATION ASSOCIATION OF PASSAIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PASSAIC BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 14, 1977. … N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4(d); Board of Education of the City of Plainfield v. Plainfield Education Association, 144 N.J. Super. 521 (App. Div. 1976).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Matter of Petition of Valley Road Sewerage Co.

    285 N.J. Super. 202 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 3, 1995

    We merely add that the findings made by the administrative law judge and the Board are supported by substantial, credible evidence present in the record. See Mayflower Securities Co. v. … Transit Sys. v. Washington Met. Area Transit Comm'n, 466 F. 2d at 422 . We recognize that the policy of the law is to aid utilities to properly function. City of Elizabeth v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of South Amboy v. Gassaway

    195 N.J. Super. 239 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 7, 1984

    fee, were submitted to the Board. … Design Co. v. Beckwith, 185 N.J.Super. 9, 17-18 (App.Div.), certif. den. 91 N.J. 545 (1982). How *245 ever, a board of adjustment is entitled to the full 120 days after the application is complete.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fasolo v. Div. of Pensions

    190 N.J. Super. 573 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 1983

    FASOLO, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF DIVISION OF PENSIONS OF NEW JERSEY TREASURY, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted June 14, 1983. … Div. v. Middlesex Cty., 188 N.J. Super. at 5 , it is helpful to look at other cases considering the propriety of prejudgment interest. In Busik v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Valentine v. Lamont

    25 N.J. Super. 342 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 1953

    Co. v. Central R. Co ., above, at p. 764. The legislature could also grant the power of eminent domain to public corporations, such as school districts or boards of education. Cf. Wendel v. … Board of Education, 25 Ohio App. 469 , 159 N.E. 99 ( Ct. App. 1927); Hopewell School Dist. No. 28 v. Bush, 179 Ark. 316 , 15 S.W. 2 d 985 ( Sup. Ct. 1929); and in O'Hara v. District of Columbia, 79 U.S. App.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Archway Programs, Inc. v. PEMBERTON TP. BD. OF EDN.

    352 N.J. Super. 420 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 28, 2002

    For example, contract claims against boards do not arise under the school laws but rather from statutory or common law. See Picogna v. Board of Educ. of Cherry Hill, 249 N.J.Super. 332, 335 , 592 A. 2d 570 (App. … Ass'n v. Board of Educ. of South Orange & Maplewood, 146 N.J.Super. 457, 463 , 370 A. 2d 47 (App. Div.1977).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security

    43 N.J. Super. 172 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 28, 1956

    Bogue Electric Co. v. Board of Review, etc., 21 N.J. 431 (1956), is cited in support of the contention. … Cassar v. Appeal Board of Michigan Employment Sec. Commission, 343 Mich. 380 , 72 N.W. 2 d 254 ( Sup. Ct. 1955); H.J. Heinz Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 172 Pa.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Tp. Berkeley Hgts. v. Bd. Adj. Tp Berkeley Hgts.

    144 N.J. Super. 291 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 1976

    THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HEIGHTS, AND CAMELOT CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS, v. STANLEY C. … See Van Ness v. Deal, supra .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jersey Urban Renewal, LLC v. City of Asbury Park

    377 N.J. Super. 232 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 2005

    As we observed in Hirth v. … We, therefore, reject plaintiffs contention that the City improperly interfered with the Planning Board’s jurisdiction. Plaintiff cites Township of Dover v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.