Case law

Cohen v. Fair Lawn

85 N.J. Super. 234 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 2, 1964

Russell v. Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Tenafly, supra, 31 N.J., at p. 66 . As noted in Central Home Trust Co. v. Gough, 5 N.J. Super. 295, 301 ( App. … Yahnel v. Board of Adjustment, 79 N.J. Super. 509, 517 ( App. Div. 1963), certif. denied 41 N.J. 116 (1963); Andrews v. Board of Adjustment of Ocean Tp., 30 N.J. 245, 251 (1959).

Gish v. BD. OF EDUCATION OF PARAMUS

145 N.J. Super. 96 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 4, 1976

State Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238 , 249-250 (1971), and to a hearing, if requested, cf. Williams v. … Winston v. So. Plainfield Bd. of Ed., 64 N.J. 582 (1974); Schwarzrock v. Bayonne Bd. of Ed., 90 N.J.L. 370 (Sup. Ct. 1917). See also, Ludwig v.

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Riefolo Constr. Co.

161 N.J. Super. 99 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 1978

Co. v. … Co. v. Pellecchia, supra . We hold that Hartford has a right to maintain this action as subrogee of the board and is not barred by its conduct from doing so.

Barnes v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.

246 N.J. Super. 348 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 1991

BARNES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. AND THE TOBACCO INSTITUTE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT. … Dewey v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 225 N.J. Super. 375 , 542 A. 2d 919 (App.Div. 1988), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, sub nom., Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 121 N.J. 69 , 577 A. 2d 1239 (1990).

Nini v. MCCC

406 N.J. Super. 547 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 2009

In Battaglia v. … See also Squeo v.

Tp. Comm. of Lakewood Tp. v. Lakewood Water Co. & Bd. of Pub. Utility Comm'rs

54 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1959

Co. v. Dept. of Public Utilities, 7 N.J. 247, 256 (1951). … Central Traction Co. v. Public Utility Board , above.

Citizens United to Protect the Maurice River & Its Tributaries, Inc. v. CITY OF MILLVILLE PLAINNING BD.

395 N.J. Super. 434 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 2007

See also Centex Homes v. … We are also satisfied that the Board's factual findings, as set forth in its resolution, were sufficiently articulated and were supported by substantial credible evidence in the record before the Board. Lang v.

Howland v. Borough of Freehold

143 N.J. Super. 484 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 11, 1976

Were the findings of fact of the Board of Adjustment based upon credible evidence adduced before the Board? p. … Roselle v.

Bray v. CAPE MAY CITY ZONING BD.

378 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 14, 2005

because a hotel is not a permitted use in the zone, and therefore a use variance, which only a Board of Adjustment has authority to grant, see Ferraro *259 v. … , 798 A. 2d 1270 (2002), with Medici v.

DEPT. OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS v. Cook

282 N.J. Super. 207 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1995

Super. 207 (1995) 659 A.2d 936 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, LOCAL FINANCE BOARD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM G. COOK, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Nor does the disclosure requirement violate the Fifth Amendment privilege of board members. See State v. Davis, 244 N.J. Super. 180, 197 , 581 *212 A. 2d 1333 (App.Div. 1990); cf. State v.

Hollander v. Watson

167 N.J. Super. 588 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 1979

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 64A OF TITLE 18A OF THE REVISED STATUTES OF NEW JERSEY, AS AMENDED, PLAINTIFF, v. … DRIVER, EUGENE V. HOWARD, JAMES E. HEDDEN, BARBARA B. SIGMUND, PAUL J. SOLLAMI, FRED GMITTER, AND JOHN S. WATSON, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MERCER, DEFENDANTS.

State v. Blanton

166 N.J. Super. 62 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 13, 1979

According to the State's evidence, Officers Wettermark and Brown accosted Elijah and informed him he was under arrest. … Leggeadrini, 75 N.J. 150 (1978); State v. Ward, 57 N.J. 75, 82 (1970); State v. Bess, 53 N.J. 10, 19 (1968), and State v. Brennan, 115 N.J. Super. 400 (App. Div. 1971).

TWC REALTY PARTNER. v. Zoning Bd.

321 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1999

See Gallo v. Salesian Soc'y, Inc., 290 N.J.Super. 616, 660 , 676 A. 2d 580 (App.Div.1996); Regino v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. … See Children's Inst. v. Verona Twp.

Tanenbaum v. TP. OF WALL BD. OF ADJ.

407 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 27, 2009

TANENBAUM and Deborah Del Nobile Tanenbaum, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWNSHIP OF WALL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and Township of Wall Planning Board, Defendants-Respondent. … NOTES [1] See Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v.

Nero v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, Camden Cty.

144 N.J. Super. 313 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1976

Rinaldi v. Mongiello, 4 N.J. Super. 7, 12 (App. Div. 1949); Zober v. Turner, 106 N.J.L. 86, 88 (E. & A. 1930); Duffield v. Memorial Hospital Ass'n of Charleston, 361 F. Supp. 398 (D.C.S.D.W. … In Withrow v.

In re the Suspension & Revocation of the License of Wolfe

160 N.J. Super. 114 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1978

Laba v. Newark Bd. of Ed., 23 N. J. 364, 382 (1957). N. J. S. A. 45:9-16 requires service of a copy of a complaint and a hearing before the Board in person or by an attorney before a medical license can be revoked. N. … Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U. S. 35 , 95 S. Ct. 1456 , 43 L.

Arlington Associates v. Township Council of Parsippany-Troy Hills

118 N.J. Super. 418 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 3, 1972

We do not find McAlpine v. Garfield Water Com’n, 135 N. J. L. 497 (E. & A. 1947), or Highpoint, Inc. v. Bloomfield Planning Board, 80 N. J. Super. 570 (Law Div. 1963), rev’d 87 N. J. Super. 58 (App. … The proper rule is that all board members need only be sufficiently informed of all matters before the board prior to a decision so as to insure an intelligently advised vote. See Taub v. Pirnie, 3 N. Y. 2d 188, 165 N.

New Jersey State League of Municipalities v. Department of Community Affairs

310 N.J. Super. 224 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 1998

See In re Schuman, 114 N.J. 14, 25 , 552 A.2d 602 (1989); Henninger v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen, 3 N.J. 68, 71 , 68 A.2d 833 (1949). … Harvey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex Cty., 30 N.J. 381, 391-92 , 153 A.2d 10 (1959).

Seibert v. Dover Tp. Bd. of Adj.

174 N.J. Super. 548 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 29, 1980

The Supreme Court, in Tomko v. … Tomko v. Vissers, supra , and Kozesnik v. Montgomery Tp., 24 N.J. 154, 187 (1957); Kelly v. Hackensack Meadowlands Develop. Comm'n, 172 N.J. Super. 223 (App.Div. 1980).

Campus Assocs. v. Zon. Bd. of Adj.

413 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 4, 2010

Super. 527 CAMPUS ASSOCIATES L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF HILLSBOROUGH, Defendant-Respondent. DOCKET NO. A-0690-08T2. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … In arguing that plaintiff lacks standing, the Board relies on our holding in Spinnaker Condominium Corp. v.