Case law

Soussa v. Denville Tp. Planning Bd.

238 N.J. Super. 66 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 23, 1990

Super. 66 (1990) 568 A.2d 1225 MAURICE SOUSSA AND ESTHER SOUSSA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DENVILLE TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Super. at 414 , 534 A. 2d 1019 (citing *69 Russell v. Tenafly Bd. of Adjustment, 31 N.J. 58, 66 , 155 A. 2d 83 (1959)).

Gentzel v. BD. OF EMBALMERS & FUNERAL DIRECTORS

9 N.J. Super. 605 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1950

GENTZEL AND NAZARE MEMORIAL HOME, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS, v. BOARD OF EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. … Nazare v. Board of Embalmers, 4 N.J. Super. 567 ( Ch. 1949).

Mt. Hill, LLC v. Tp. Committee of Middletown

403 N.J. Super. 146 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 10, 2008

LaRue v. … In Hughes v.

Riya Finnegan, LLC v. TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF SOUTH BRUNSWICK

386 N.J. Super. 255 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 2006

Super. 255 RIYA FINNEGAN, LLC, Plaintiffs v. TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF SOUTH BRUNSWICK and the Planning Board of the Township of South Brunswick, Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County. … Cresskill v. Dumont, 15 N.J. 238, 249 , 104 A. 2d 441 (1954) (citing Conlon v. Bd. of Pub. Works of Paterson, 11 N.J. 363, 366 , 94 A. 2d 660 (1953)).

Metalsalts Corp. v. Weiss

76 N.J. Super. 291 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 17, 1962

State v. Kociolek, 23 N.J. 400, 415 , (1957). … In Palatini v. Sarian, 15 N.J. Super. 34 ( App.

Grogan v. DeSapio

15 N.J. Super. 604 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 6, 1951

Board therein." … In Whittingham v.

Santiago v. E.W. Bliss Division

201 N.J. Super. 205 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1985

It was then transferred to defendant equipment brokers, Alexander Brown-Capitol Machine in July 1977, who in turn sold it to plaintiff’s employer in April 1981. … E.g., Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155 (1984); Soler v. Castmaster, Div. of H.P.M. Corp., supra; O'Brien v. Muskin Corp., supra; Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chem, Corp., supra; Suter v.

Borough of Rocky Hill v. State

420 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 24, 2010

Super. 365 BOROUGH OF ROCKY HILL, Rocky Hill Board Of Education, Millstone Borough Board of Education and Janine Lacava (an individual taxpayer from the Borough of Rocky Hill), Plaintiffs, v. … While there was once a question as to whether the doctrine applied to local school board elections, see Sailors v.

F & W ASSOCIATES v. County of Somerset

276 N.J. Super. 519 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 1994

expressed in Divan Builders, Inc. v. … Co. v. Planning Bd., 222 N.J.

Ridgewood Educ. v. Ridgewood Bd.

284 N.J. Super. 427 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1995

Super. 427 (1995) 665 A.2d 776 RIDGEWOOD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, ELAINE HIGGINS AND ANN HOVAN, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v. RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. … Silverman v. Board of Ed., Tp. of Millburn, 134 N.J. Super. 253, 257-58 , 339 A. 2d 233 (Law Div.), aff'd o.b. 136 N.J. Super. 435 , 346 A. 2d 611 (App.Div. 1975).

Esso Standard Oil Co. v. CITY COUNCIL, NORTHFIELD

41 N.J. Super. 105 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 13, 1956

Super. 105 (1956) 123 A.2d 885 ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. … . * * * * * * * * (3) To review any decision of a planning board, board of adjustment, or of a building inspector after 30 days from the publication and filing of the decision in the office of the board or of the building

Guaclides v. MAYOR & COUN. OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS

119 N.J. Super. 403 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1972

In their objection to the ordinance provision for hearings before the planning board plaintiffs rely upon the reference to "the very expertise expected of a planning board" found in Kozesnik v. … conform to accepted standards of due process in administrative proceeding." *408 The purpose for planning board action on site plans, as explained in Kozesnik v.

Price v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

279 N.J. Super. 327 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1993

See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-2 and hence, may be taken into account by the board in making its determinations. The case of O'Donnell v. Koch, 197 N.J. … And in Marino v.

OLUWABUNMI OJO v. BOARD OF REVIEW, ETC. (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 28, 2022

See Self v. … Welfare Bd. v. N.J. Civ. Serv. Comm'n, 93 N.J. 384, 390-91 (1983). "If the Board's factual findings are supported by 'sufficient credible evidence, [we] are obliged to accept them.'" Brady v.

Busch v. Plews

19 N.J. Super. 195 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 18, 1952

Eq. 498 ( Ch. 1926); Hood v. Francis, supra ; Board of Home Missions v. Saltmer, 125 N.J. Eq. 33 ( Ch. 1939). Clearly, Lillian W. … Board of Home Missions v. Saltmer, supra . It seems clear that Lillian W. Seidel intended to exercise the power of appointment to the extent of the $5,000 by the bequest to Frank P.

Maurice River Bd. of Ed. v. Maurice River Tchrs.

187 N.J. Super. 566 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 24, 1982

Super. 566 (1982) 455 A.2d 563 MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, PLAINTIFF, v. MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT. … The prime example is State v.

Keenan v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF ESSEX CTY

106 N.J. Super. 312 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1969

Co. v Highway Trailer Co., 385 U.S. 834 , 87 S.Ct. 77 , 17 L.Ed. 2 d 68 (1966); Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape May, 19 N.J. 493, 503-504 (1955). … The latter assertion is expressly refuted by McDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County, 98 N.J. Law 386, 391 ( Sup. Ct. 1922), affirmed 99 N.J. Law 393, 398 ( E. & A. 1923).

Moore v. Truesdale

48 N.J. Super. 257 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 1958

Justice Heher, who in his deliverance of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Giles v. Gassert, 23 N. … See, Schlenger v. Conti, 47 N. J. Super. 566 (App. Div. 1957).

Trevorrow v. Boyer

52 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1958

TREVORROW, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. RALPH RICHARD BOYER, DEFENDANT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … In Moore v.

Paul Schorr v. the Planning Board of the City of Trenton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 2024

A-3938-21 PAUL SCHORR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Tri-State Ship Repair & Dry Dock Co. v. City of Perth Amboy, 349 N.J. Super. 418, 423 (App. Div. 2002) (quoting Washington Twp. Zoning Bd. of Adj. v. Washington Twp. Planning Bd., 217 N.J. Super. 215, 225 (App.