Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

2.01s

  • Bounds v. Prospero

    319 N.J. Super. 277 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 1999

    , the Board’s Adminis *279 trative Secretary (collectively “the County”). … Ebler v. City of Newark, 54 N.J. 487, 490-91 , 256 A.2d 44 (1969); West Point Island Civic *284 Ass’n v. Township Comm., 54 N.J. 339, 346-47, 255 A.2d 237 (1969); 181 Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fellowship Bank v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.

    158 N.J. Super. 107 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1978

    Super. 107 (1978) 385 A.2d 887 FELLOWSHIP BANK, A NEW JERSEY BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. … Auth. v. Hackensack Water Co., supra .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Potter v. Village Bank of New Jersey

    225 N.J. Super. 547 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1988

    English v. College of Medicine and Dentistry of N.J., 73 N.J. 20, 23 (1977). An employee serving at the pleasure of the board of directors therefore had no recourse against the board of directors when he was fired. … In Pierce v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • OPEN DOOR ALCOHOLISM PROG. v. Bd. of Adjustment

    200 N.J. Super. 191 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 1985

    As noted in State v. … And, in Berger v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Township of Berkeley Heights v. Division of Tax Appeals

    68 N.J. Super. 364 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1961

    See also City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 18 N. J. 371 to 377 (1955). … Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 5 N. J. 454, 464 (1950).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Civil Commitment of MLV

    388 N.J. Super. 454 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 24, 2006

    M.L.V. appealed the revocation of his parole to this court and, by opinion filed on September 30, 2002, we remanded the matter to the Board for reconsideration. M.L.V. v. N.J. State Parole Board, No. … Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N.J. 589, 599 , 210 A. 2d 753 (1965) (citing State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146, 162 , 199 A. 2d 809 (1964)).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Sexton v. Bates

    17 N.J. Super. 246 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 31, 1951

    In George v. Board of Excise of Elizabeth, 73 N.J.L. 366 ( Sup. … Newark Athletic Club v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Newark, 7 N.J. Misc. 55 ( Sup.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Solid Rock Baptist Church v. Carlton

    347 N.J. Super. 180 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 2002

    Moore v. … Board of Trustees, Our Lady of Fatima Chapel, 281 N.J.Super. 459 , 658 A. 2d 327 (Ch.Div.1995) with Church of Christ at Centerville v. Carder, 105 Wash. 2d 204 , 713 P. 2d 101 (1986). In Watson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Maurice River Bd. of Educ. v. MAURICE RIVER ETC.

    193 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 22, 1984

    That may be so, but on the other hand the Board points to no constitutional or statutory bar to such recording. We do know there is no per se constitutional *492 bar to the videotaping of criminal trials. Chandler v. … To warrant a ban on the videotaping of the Board meetings, more than a potential for adversely affecting one or more persons must be shown. Id. at 581 , 101 S.Ct. at 813 , 66 L.Ed. 2d at 756 . See also Belcher v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jennings v. Borough of Highlands

    418 N.J. Super. 405 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 2011

    Fox v. Kings Grant Maint. Ass’n Inc., 167 N.J. 208, 219 , 770 A.2d 707 (2001) (citing Siller v. … Condominium association board members are required to “act reasonably and in good faith in carrying out their duties.” Papalexiou v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of South Amboy v. Gassaway

    195 N.J. Super. 239 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 7, 1984

    fee, were submitted to the Board. … Design Co. v. Beckwith, 185 N.J.Super. 9, 17-18 (App.Div.), certif. den. 91 N.J. 545 (1982). How *245 ever, a board of adjustment is entitled to the full 120 days after the application is complete.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Neighborhoods v. Guadagno

    453 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 2018

    V. … Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs. , 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). The Board of Education became an elected board in 2011.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Botkin v. Mayor & Borough Council of Westwood

    52 N.J. Super. 416 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 31, 1958

    Shaner & Sons v. Board of Education of City of Millville, supra. … Howe v. Board of Education of Landis Township School District, 72 N.J.L. 158, 163 ( Sup. Ct. 1905); Worthley v. Steen, 43 N.J.L. 542 ( Sup. Ct. 1881).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Arlington Assoc. v. TP. COUN PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS

    118 N.J. Super. 418 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 3, 1972

    We do not find McAlpine v. Garfield Water Com'n, 135 N.J.L. 497 (E. & A. 1947), or Highpoint, Inc. v. Bloomfield Planning Board, 80 N.J. Super. 570 (Law Div. 1963), rev'd 87 N.J. Super. 58 (App. … The proper rule is that all board members need only be sufficiently informed of all matters before the board prior to a decision so as to insure an intelligently advised vote. See Taub v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cromwell Associates v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF CITY OF NEWARK

    211 N.J. Super. 462 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 7, 1985

    On August 31, 1984, plaintiff applied to the Rent Control Board of the City of Newark (hereinafter the board) for hardship increases. … Wilson v. City of Long Branch, 27 N.J. 360, 377 (1958), certif. den. 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct. 113 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 104 (1958); Nelson v. South Brunswick Planning Board, 84 N.J. Super. 265, 277 (App.Div. 1964). IV.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • NY Central RR v. Ridgefield

    84 N.J. Super. 85 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 29, 1964

    BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, RESPONDENT, AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … See Cuna v. Board of Fire Commissioners, Avenel, 42 N.J. 292 (1964), as to the legal effect of the word "include," or "including" in a legislative enactment.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • In Re Promulgation of Rules of Practice

    132 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 26, 1974

    Builders, *49 Owners and Managers Association v. Blair, 60 N.J. 330 (1972); Township of Deptford v. Woodbury Ter. Sewerage Corp., 54 N.J. 418 (1969). … Consolidation Coal Co., et al v. Kandle, et al, 105 N.J. Super. 104, 114 (App. Div.), aff'd 54 N.J. 11 (1969).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Paul Schorr v. the Planning Board of the City of Trenton

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 2024

    A-3772-21 PAUL SCHORR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Tri-State Ship Repair & Dry Dock Co. v. City of Perth Amboy, 349 N.J. Super. 418, 423 (App. Div. 2002) (quoting Washington Twp. Zoning Bd. of Adj. v. Washington Twp. Planning Bd., 217 N.J. Super. 215, 225 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Allstate Insurance v. Orthopedic Evaluations, Inc.

    300 N.J. Super. 510 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 2, 1997

    Furman, 41 N.J. 467, 483 , 197 A.2d 366 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 379 U.S. 14 , 85 S.Ct. 144 , 13 L.Ed.2d 84 (1964); Gualano v. Board of Sch. … See, e.g., Board of Educ. v. Asbury Park Educ. Ass’n, 155 N.J.Super. 76 , 382 A.2d 392 (App.Div.1977).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Balmoral Arms v. RUTKIN

    104 N.J. Super. 354 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1969

    Super. 354 (1969) 250 A.2d 50 BALMORAL ARMS, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. … State v. United States Steel Corp., 12 N.J. 38, 45 (1953).

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.