Case law

LP Marron & Co. v. River Vale Tp.

54 N.J. Super. 64 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1959

In Roberts Electric, Inc. v. … It bottoms this conclusion on the ordinance involved at the time the board of adjustment acted, on N.J.S.A. 40:55-39( c ), and on the case of Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment, Newark, 9 N.J. 405 (1952).

Alston v. Bd. of Adjustment

216 N.J. Super. 221 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1986

Jantausch v. Borough of Verona, 41 N.J.Super. 89, 96-97 (Law Div.1956); YWCA v. Bd. of Adj. Summit, 134 N.J.Super. 384, 388 (Law Div.1975); United Prop. Owners Assn. of Belmar v. … Lizak v. Faria, 96 N.J. 482, 492-495 (1984); Data Access Systems, Inc. v. State, 68 N.J. 158 , 166-167 (1973).

Moore v. Bd. of Freeholders of Mercer County

76 N.J. Super. 396 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 9, 1962

His supporting opinion appears in Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer County, 76 N.J. Super. 42 ( Ch. Div. 1962). … The fact that two of the plaintiffs are Republican candidates for election to the Freeholder Board is of no moment. Casey v. MacPhail , above. Evening Journal Ass'n v. MacPhail, 45 N.J.

Clinton Tp. Citizen's Comm. v. Clinton Tp.

185 N.J. Super. 343 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 1982

In Arace v. Irvington, 75 N.J. … In Ream v. Kuhlman, 112 N.J.

Galante v. Teaneck Dept. of Health

70 N.J. Super. 362 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1961

Chaiet v. East Orange, 136 N.J.L. 375 ( Sup. Ct. 1948); Mills v. Mosher, 128 N.J.L. 546 ( Sup. Ct. 1942); Spiro Drug Service Inc. v. Board of Com'rs of Union City, 130 N.J.L. 1 ( Sup. … Wagner v. Mayor and Municipal Council of City of Newark, supra ; Roselle v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co., supra.

State in Interest of ST

233 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1989

Not only is the disposition of this appeal moot, see Cain v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 78 N.J. 253, 255 (1978); New Jersey State Parole Board v. Boulden, 156 N.J. Super. 494, 496 (App.Div. 1978); State v. … Super. 548, 551 (App.Div. 1978); see also Brown v. Yeldell, 487 F. 2d 1210, 1212 (D.C.

Gable v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC EMP. RET. SYSTEM

224 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 1988

GABLE, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 19, 1988. … The Board cites Pushko v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension, 208 N.J. Super. 141 (App.Div. 1986) (Pushko II), as supportive of its determination that Kane's first prong was not met. See also Pushko v.

Diller & Fisher Co., Inc. v. Arch. Rev. Bd.

246 N.J. Super. 362 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1990

Bd. v. … In Bigelow v.

Tanenbaum v. WALL BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

407 N.J. Super. 446 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 2006

In Rumson Estates, Inc. v. … In Mount Olive Complex v.

Caldwell v. Lambrou

161 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1978

DAUM: OLGA NALEWICK: DOROTHY STILLWELL: WILLIAM & ELEANOR KNAPP: DANIEL & VIOLA MARINO: PLAINTIFFS, v. GEORGE LAMBROU, DOROTHY R. … Evans v. Villani, 19 N.J. Super. 86 (App. Div. 1952). When a decision of municipal government is challenged, the substituted writ is that of certiorari, a predominantly appellate form of action. Specht v.

Gregory v. Borough of Avalon

391 N.J. Super. 181 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 2007

Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer Cty., supra, 169 N.J. at 152-53 , 777 A. 2d 19 (quoting Reilly v. … In Adams v.

Cardinal Properties v. Westwood

227 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 1988

See PRB Enterprises, Inc. v. South Brunswick, supra at 8; Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. Livingston Tp. in Essex Cty., 199 N.J. Super. 470, 477 (App.Div. 1985). … ] In Exxon Co., U.S.A. v.

Molino v. Mayor and Council of Bor. of Glassboro

116 N.J. Super. 195 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 27, 1971

MOLINO, TRADING AS HOLLYBUSH GARDENS APARTMENTS, PLAINTIFF, v. … Tremarco Corp. v. Garzio, 32 N.J. 448 (1960); Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Twp., 39 N.J. 1 (1962).

Phillips v. Bd. of Adjustment of Westfield

41 N.J. Super. 549 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 4, 1956

Lumund v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Rutherford, 6 N.J. Super. 474 ( Law Div. 1949), affirmed 4 N.J. 577 (1950); Preye v. Board of Adjustment of North Bergen, 22 N.J. Super. 161 ( App. Div. 1952); Beirn v. … Ackerman v. Board of Commissioners of Belleville, 1 N.J. Super. 69 ( App. Div. 1948); Tzeses v. Board of Trustees of South Orange, 22 N.J. Super. 45 ( App. Div. 1952); Beirn v. Morris, supra .

Mulligan v. Panther Valley Property Owners Ass'n

337 N.J. Super. 293 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 2001

Other reported cases in New Jersey which have considered such amendments have, generally, arisen following action by the community's board of trustees. See, e.g., Thanasoulis v. … State v. Panther Valley Prop.

Stonco v. Bd. of Rev., Div. of Emp. SEC.

106 N.J. Super. 6 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1969

N.J.S.A. 43:21-2; Sweeney v. Board of Review, 43 N.J. 535, 539 (1965); Campbell Soup Co. v. Board of Review, Division of Employment Security, 13 N.J. 431, 436 (1953). … Zielenski v. Board of Review, 85 N.J. Super. 46, 52 ( App. Div. 1964).

Sussman v. Overlook Hospital Assn.

95 N.J. Super. 418 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1967

SCIALABBA, M.D., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. … The concept that a hospital, such as Overlook, may arbitrarily deny staff privileges to a qualified doctor was rejected by our Supreme Court in Greisman v. Newcomb Hospital, 40 N.J. 389, 401 (1963).

Meridian Development Co. v. Edison Tp.

91 N.J. Super. 310 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1966

Upon recommendation of the planning board, the board of adjustment approved the special exception use on February 16, 1965. … The referral of a zoning ordinance amendment to the planning board is mandatory. Wollen v. Borough of Fort Lee, 27 N.J. 408 (1958); Hasbrouck Heights Hosp. Ass'n. v.

Reilly v. Riviera Towers Corp.

310 N.J. Super. 265 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1998

Rakowsky v. … 639, 640 (App.Div.1983) (board had authority to impose reasonable fee); McCabe v.

A & B AUTO STORES v. City of Newark

103 N.J. Super. 559 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 29, 1968

Clark Thread Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson, 54 N.J.L. 265, 266 ( Sup. Ct. 1891); Wells Fargo & Co. v. … Crane v. Bielski, 15 N.J. 342 (1954); Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 10 N.J. Misc. 555 ( Ch. 1932); Britton v. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum, 46 N.J. Eq. 102, 112 ( Ch. 1889). affirmed 47 N.J.