Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.91s
Weston Electrical Instrument Corp. v. Newark
11 N.J. Super. 493 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1951
Estell v. Hawkins, 50 N.J.L. 122 ( Sup. Ct. 1887); General Motors Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 124 N.J.L. 212 ( Sup. Ct. 1940); affirmed, 125 N.J.L. 574 ( E. & A. 1940); L. Bamberger & Co. v. … Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 49 N.J.L. 1, 6 ( Sup. Ct. 1886); General Motors Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublished385 N.J. Super. 501 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 2006
Where a board member has an immediate and real conflict, it must be disclosed. See McVoy v. … The same prohibition applies to planning board members. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-23b. See Trust Co. of N.J. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFdasmart, Inc. v. Dishman Pharmaceuticals (L-7832-13, Middlesex County and Statewide)
448 N.J. Super. 195 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 29, 2016
Daimler AG v. Bauman, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 134 S. Ct. 746, 754, 187 L. Ed. 2d 624, 633 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919, 131 S. Ct. 2846, 2851, 180 L. … In addressing the first factor, although there may be commonality of ownership between the parent and subsidiary, we have held that dominance "cannot be established by overlapping boards of directors."
Cited 16 timesPublishedWOODLAND CIVIC ASSN. v. Brick Homes, Inc.
144 N.J. Super. 78 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 23, 1976
Plaintiff correctly observes that proceedings before a zoning board are of a quasi -judicial nature. J.D. Construction Corp. v. Isaacs, 51 N.J. 263 (1968). … See Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 285 (1965). Plaintiff's motion to remand the application to the board is denied; defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted.
Cited 4 timesPublished236 N.J. Super. 558 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 29, 1989
[I]n Gardner v. … See People v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMichael Hopson v. Anthony Cirz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2025
D'Agostino v. Maldonado, 216 N.J. 168, 182 (2013); see also Manalapan Realty, LP v. Twp. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 N.J. Super. 13 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1949
The Board of Review had the advantage of personal observation of the witnesses. As Mr. Justice Heher, speaking for the Supreme Court, in the case of Gilbert v. … See, also, Reis v. Breeze Corporations, Inc., 129 N.J.L. 138 ( Sup. Ct. 1942); De Geeter v. Bennett, 133 N.J. Eq. 349 ( E. A. 1943).
Cited 3 timesPublished260 N.J. Super. 591 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 1992
State v. … Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 828 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 705, 711 , reh'g den. 386 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 1283 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 241 (1967).
Cited 8 timesPublishedTp. of Gloucester v. Bd. of Ed., Black Horse, Etc.
50 N.J. Super. 437 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 1958
Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 24 N.J. Super. 252 ( Law Div. 1952), affirmed 27 N.J. Super. 240, 242 ( App. Div. 1953). … N.J.S.A. 18:7-77.1; Citizens to Protect Public Funds v. Board of Education of Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills, 13 N.J. 172 (1953).
Cited 2 timesPublished458 N.J. Super. 213 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 2019
Lesniak , 117 N.J. at 32 -33 , 563 A.2d 795 ; see also Brown v. Kennedy Mem'l Hosp. , 312 N.J. Super. 579 , 593-94, 711 A.2d 1370 (App. … We find, however, that Brown is distinguishable from the instant case.
Cited 11 timesPublished4 N.J. Super. 123 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1949
The appointive power of the several commissioners under a commission form of government is subject to be assigned or withdrawn at any time in the discretion of the Board of Commissioners. In Tagliareni v. … Tagliareni v. Stilz, supra; Murphy v. Bayonne, 130 N.J.L. 336 ( Sup. Ct. 1943), and Taggart v. Altman, 130 N.J.L. 563 ( Sup. Ct. 1943).
Cited 8 timesPublishedJOHN E. SUSKO VS. BOROUGH OF BELMAR (L-1427-15, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2019
City of Long Branch v. Liu, 203 N.J. 464, 474-76 (2010) (quoting Matthews v. Bay Head Improvement Ass'n, 95 N.J. 306, 316-17 (1984)). Accord Borough of Neptune City v. … See Lusardi v. Curtis Point Prop.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCounty of Bergen v. Department of Public Utilities of New Jersey
117 N.J. Super. 304 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1971
Moyant v. Paramus, 30 N. J. 528, 543 (1959) ; Lyon v. Elizabeth, 43 N. J. L. 158, 161 (Sup. Ct. 1881). By N. J. S. … The powers delegated by the Legislature to the Board are to be read broadly. Any exception must be carefully circumscribed. Deptford Tp. v. Woodbury Ter. Sewerage Corp., supra, 54 N. J. at 426.
Cited 5 timesPublished226 N.J. Super. 631 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1988
Morrow v. Hasselman, 69 N.J. … Given the authority for injunctive relief, the court must nevertheless concern itself with the propriety of the board's action in this specific case. Papalexiou v. Tower West Condominium, 167 N.J.
Cited 11 timesPublished157 N.J. Super. 469 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1978
See also, State v. Shoopman, 11 N.J. 333 (1953); State v. Albertalli, 112 A. 724 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1915). The recent United States Supreme Court decision Brown v. … Brown v. Ohio does not suggest a contrary thesis.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOtchy v. City of Elizabeth Bd. of Educ.
325 N.J. Super. 98 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1999
In Kernan v. … Board of Educ. of Newark, 17 N.J. Misc. 75 , 4 A. 2d 687 (1939); see also Kuzmicz v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedIrvington General Hsp. v. Dept. of Health
149 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 2, 1977
Home v. Dougherty, 131 N.J. Super. 412, 418-419 (App. Div. 1974). But that did not mean that he and the Board could permit those figures to be the sole determinative factor. … V, § IV, par. 2; Art. V, § IV, par. 5; Art. III, par. 1; Grzankowski v. Heymann, 128 N.J. Super. 563, 565-567 (App. Div. 1974); State v. Governor, 25 N.J.L. 331, 349 (Sup. Ct. 1856); Passaic County Bar Ass'n v.
Cited 10 timesPublished262 N.J. Super. 270 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1992
V. In Gauer v. … McFeely v. Board of Pensions Com'rs, 1 N.J. 212, 216 , 62 A. 2d 686 (1948).
Cited 13 timesPublishedSagarese v. Bd. of Health of Morristown
31 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 30, 1954
Sagarese v. Board of Health of Town of Morristown, 27 N.J. Super. 400 ( App. Div. 1953). … McDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, N.J., 125 A. 378 ( Sup. Ct. 1924), not officially reported, affirmed 99 N.J.L. 393 ( E. & A. 1924) and Tomlin v. Glassboro Board of Education, 1 N.J. Misc. 568 ( Sup.
Cited 6 timesPublishedClinton Tp. Citizen's Comm. v. Clinton Tp.
185 N.J. Super. 343 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 1982
In Arace v. Irvington, 75 N.J. … In Ream v. Kuhlman, 112 N.J.
Cited 22 timesPublished
Ask Donna