Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.96s
9 N.J. Super. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 26, 1950
See Deep Rock Oil Corporation v. Fox, supra; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown, supra . Cf. Mattan v. Hoover, 350 Mo. 506 , 166 S.W. 2d 557 (1942). … Sears, Roebuck & Co., supra; Demeter v. Rosenberg, 114 N.J.L. 55, 57 ( Sup. Ct. 1934); Murphy v. Brown & Co., 91 N.J.L. 412, 416 ( Sup. Ct. 1918). Cf.
Cited 5 timesPublished382 N.J. Super. 366 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 2006
Instead, we begin our analysis with Pushko v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund, 208 N.J.Super. 141 , 505 A. 2d 154 (App.Div. 1986). … The Board asserts that petitioner's reliance on Taylor v. Metzger, 152 N.J. 490 , 706 A. 2d 685 (1998), is misplaced.
Reversed on other grounds by Patterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System, 194 N.J. 29 (2008)Cited 2 timesPublishedPreakness Hill, Inc. v. Township Council of Wayne
221 N.J. Super. 175 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1987
Bd. of Adj. v. … We find no legislative intent to detract from the powers of boards of adjustment. As the court stated in Illes v. Edison Tp.
Reversed by Preakness Hill, Inc. v. Township Council of Wayne, 113 N.J. 370 (1988)Cited 3 timesPublishedMoore v. Bd. of Freeholders of Mercer County
76 N.J. Super. 396 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 9, 1962
His supporting opinion appears in Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer County, 76 N.J. Super. 42 ( Ch. Div. 1962). … The fact that two of the plaintiffs are Republican candidates for election to the Freeholder Board is of no moment. Casey v. MacPhail , above. Evening Journal Ass'n v. MacPhail, 45 N.J.
Modified by Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Mercer, 39 N.J. 26 (1962)Cited 31 timesPublishedCP v. Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Educ.
293 N.J. Super. 421 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 15, 1996
In Ayers v. … The school board is considered a person and may be sued directly under § 1983. Monell v. New York City Dep't of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690 , 98 S.Ct. 2018, 2035 , 56 L.Ed. 2d 611, 635 (1978); Henschke v.
Cited 14 timesPublished456 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 29, 2018
Inspection is required "to determine the condition of rental facilities, rental units and rooming/boarding houses in order ... to safeguard the health, safety, welfare of the occupants ... and of the general public." … Finally, relying on the United States Supreme court's opinion in Brown v.
Cited 15 timesPublished72 N.J. Super. 596 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 23, 1962
Marschalk v. Weber, 11 N.J. Super. 16, 21 ( App. Div. 1950), certification denied 6 N.J. 569 (1951); Richard v. Falleti, 13 N.J. Super. 534 ( App. Div. 1951); Alnor Construction Co. v. … The Supreme Court in the case of State v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGarden St. Comm. Hsp. v. State Bd. of Med. Exam
147 N.J. Super. 592 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1977
Super. 592 (1977) 371 A.2d 794 GARDEN STATE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, RESPONDENT. ELMER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, RESPONDENT. … . [___ N.J. at ___] In Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts v.
Cited 5 timesPublished233 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1989
Not only is the disposition of this appeal moot, see Cain v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 78 N.J. 253, 255 (1978); New Jersey State Parole Board v. Boulden, 156 N.J.Super. 494, 496 (App.Div. 1978); State v. … Middleton, 156 N.J.Super. 548, 551 (App.Div. 1978); see also Brown v. Yeldell, 487 F.2d 1210, 1212 (D.C.
Cited 1 timesPublished273 N.J. Super. 421 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1994
Moore v. Bridgewater Tp., 69 N.J. Super. 1, 9-20 , 173 A. 2d 430 (App.Div. 1961); Bernardsville Quarry, Inc. v. Borough of Bernardsville, 129 N.J. 221, 237 , 608 A. 2d 1377 (1992). … Partnership v. Planning Bd. of Township of Chester, 237 N.J. Super. 118 , 567 A. 2d 221 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 118 N.J. 234 , 570 A. 2d 984 (1989).
Cited 5 timesPublishedTanenbaum v. WALL BD. OF ADJUSTMENT
407 N.J. Super. 446 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 2006
In Rumson Estates, Inc. v. … In Mount Olive Complex v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMeridian Development Co. v. Edison Tp.
91 N.J. Super. 310 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1966
Upon recommendation of the planning board, the board of adjustment approved the special exception use on February 16, 1965. … The referral of a zoning ordinance amendment to the planning board is mandatory. Wollen v. Borough of Fort Lee, 27 N.J. 408 (1958); Hasbrouck Heights Hosp. Ass'n. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedReilly v. Riviera Towers Corp.
310 N.J. Super. 265 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1998
Rakowsky v. … 639, 640 (App.Div.1983) (board had authority to impose reasonable fee); McCabe v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState, Department of Environmental Protection v. Standard Tank
284 N.J. Super. 381 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1995
See Brown v. Brown, 208 N.J. Super. 372, 381-82 , 506 A. 2d 29 (App.Div. 1986). … See Brown v. Brown, supra, 208 N.J. Super. at 381-82 , 506 A. 2d 29 . In that event, there would have been no impediment to the DEP naming not only STCC but also Susan Frank and Kresch as defendants.
Cited 13 timesPublished343 N.J. Super. 401 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2001
On this appeal, Mullarney argues, as follows: (1) the Board erred in concluding that Yardville Supply Co. v. … If the Board's factual determinations are supported by sufficient credible evidence, we must accept them. Brady v. Board of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210 , 704 A. 2d 547 (1997).
Cited 9 timesPublished161 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1978
DAUM: OLGA NALEWICK: DOROTHY STILLWELL: WILLIAM & ELEANOR KNAPP: DANIEL & VIOLA MARINO: PLAINTIFFS, v. GEORGE LAMBROU, DOROTHY R. … Evans v. Villani, 19 N.J. Super. 86 (App. Div. 1952). When a decision of municipal government is challenged, the substituted writ is that of certiorari, a predominantly appellate form of action. Specht v.
Cited 8 timesPublished66 N.J. Super. 530 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 3, 1961
A local board of health is an entity distinct from the municipality in which it is established, Board of Health of City of Asbury Park v. N.Y., etc., R.R. Co., 77 N.J.L. 15 ( Sup. Ct. 1908); Valentine v. … Div. 1953); see also Zullo v. Board of Health of Woodbridge Township, 9 N.J. 431 (1952).
Cited 4 timesPublished79 N.J. Super. 465 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 29, 1963
Kagan v. Caroselli, 30 N.J. 371 (1959); Fitzgerald v. Jersey City, 69 N.J.L. 162 ( Sup. Ct. 1902); Vail v. Inhabitants of Plainfield, 9 N.J. Misc. 817 , 155 A. 679 ( S.Ct. 1931); Frazer v. … See Clifton v. Zweir, supra .
Cited 7 timesPublished458 N.J. Super. 213 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 2019
Lesniak , 117 N.J. at 32 -33 , 563 A.2d 795 ; see also Brown v. Kennedy Mem'l Hosp. , 312 N.J. Super. 579 , 593-94, 711 A.2d 1370 (App. … We find, however, that Brown is distinguishable from the instant case.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMaureen A. Grasso & R.G. Grasso, Jr., Inc. v. Borough of Spring Lake Heights
375 N.J. Super. 41 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 24, 2004
Assocs., L.P. v. … Kaufmann v.
Cited 22 timesPublished
Ask Donna