Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.29s
85 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1964
of the board, any attempt by the board to create an office for the term of five years is illegal and void, citing Trowbridge v. … In Haight v. Love, supra, the appointment of the city collector was made by the board of finance and not, as here, by the central governing body of the town. The inference in Wilson v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedShri Sai Voorhees v. Township of Voorhees
406 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 21, 2009
Ass'n v. … In Frugis v.
Cited 1 timesPublished99 N.J. Super. 270 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 1967
The court reviewed the decisions in Sams v. Sams, 247 S.C. 467 , 148 S.E. 2 d 154 ( Sup. Ct. 1966): Mortensen v. Southern Pacific Company, 245 Cal. App. 2 d 241, 53 Cal. Rptr. 851 ( Cal. App. 1966); Brown v. … See also Brown v. Kendrick and Lipscomb, supra . [10] E.g., Knutsen v. Brown, 96 N.J. Super. 229 ( App. Div. 1967).
Cited 37 timesPublishedLavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Ed.
178 N.J. Super. 221 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1981
LAVIN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF HACKENSACK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 8, 1980. … In holding that petitioner's claim was no different from any cause of action grounded in contract, the State Board principally relied upon Miller v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLubliner v. Bd. of Alcoholic Bev. Con., Paterson
59 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1960
Russell v. Board of Adjustment of Tenafly, supra, 31 N.J., at page 67 ; Hudson Bergen County Retail Liquor Stores Ass'n v. Board of Com'rs. of City of Hoboken, 135 N.J.L. 502, 511 ( E. & A. 1947); Fanwood v. … Passarella v. Board of Comm., 1 N.J. Super. 313 ( App. Div. 1949).
Modified by Lubliner v. BD. OF ALCOHOLIC BEV. CON., CITY OF PATERSON, 33 N.J. 428 (1960)Cited 2 timesPublished172 N.J. Super. 479 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 1980
Ward v. Scott, 11 N.J. 117, 123-124 (1952). … It is not the function of the board of adjustment or the planning board to decide constitutional questions of this kind. Questions of law are the peculiar province of the courts. Honigfeld v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLawrence M. Krain Assocs. v. Maple Shade Tp.
185 N.J. Super. 336 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 10, 1982
Carbone v. Weehawken Tp. Planning *342 Board, 175 N.J. Super. 584 (Law Div. 1980). … In Peoples Trust v. Hasbrouck Heights, 60 N.J.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBridge v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment
233 N.J. Super. 587 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1989
Westwood Board of Adjustment, 81 N.J. 597 (1980); Nash v. Board of Adjustment of Morris Tp., 96 N.J. 97 (1984); Davis Enterprises v. Karpf, 105 N.J. 476 (1987). … However, in Chirichello v. Zoning Board of Adj. Monmouth Beach, 78 N.J. 544 (1979), the Supreme Court created a potential exception.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBorough of Roselle Pk. v. Tp. of Union
113 N.J. Super. 87 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 11, 1970
In Jersey City v. … The court in Jersey City v.
Cited 15 timesPublished7 N.J. Super. 259 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1950
Amodio v. Board of Commissioners of West New York, 133 N.J.L. 220, 225 ( Sup. Ct. 1945). … Board of Health, Weehawken, v. New York Central Railroad Company, supra . Affirmed.
Cited 12 timesPublishedGRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO., INC. v. Manufacturers Cas. Co.
37 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 30, 1955
Plaintiff also cites National Surety Co. v. County Board of Education, 15 F. 2 d, 993 (4 Cir., 1926), and Jersey City Water Supply Co. v. Metropolitan Construction Co., supra, and Meyer v. … public board, *294 Franklin Lumber Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPrunetti v. Mercer County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders
350 N.J. Super. 72 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 2001
The Board cites Gibson v. Board of Education of Newark, 205 N.J.Super. 48 , 500 A. 2d 27 (App.Div.1985) and Hiering v. … v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMedical Soc. v. NJ Dept. of Law
229 N.J. Super. 128 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1988
Swede v. City of Clifton, supra, 22 N.J. at 312 . … See DeFazio v. Haven Savings and Loan Ass'n., 22 N.J. 511, 519 (1956); Carlo v. The Okonite Callender Cable Co., 3 N.J. 253, 265 (1949); Marley v. Palmyra Bor., 193 N.J. Super. 271, 292 (Law Div. 1983).
Reversed on other grounds by Medical Society v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety, 120 N.J. 18 (1990)Cited 5 timesPublishedDe Nike v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC., RETIREMENT SYS.
62 N.J. Super. 280 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1960
Frigiola v. State Board of Education, 25 N.J. Super. 75, 79 ( App. Div. 1953); Morgan v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund, supra . … Div. 1954); Frigiola v. State Board of Education, supra .
Cited 10 timesPublishedBorough of Woodstown v. Township of Lower Alloways Creek
124 N.J. Super. 347 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 1973
There are two unreported former Supreme Court decisions, Pusey and Jones Co. v. State Board (Sup. Ct. 1921) and Scott v. Board of *354 Equalization of Taxes (Sup. … But the assessment is not complete until the County Board certifies the assessor’s duplicate to the Tax Collector. Haclcensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals, supra; Baldwin Construction Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSquires Gate, Inc. v. County of Monmouth
247 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1991
Assocs. v. *9 Atlantic Cty., 230 N.J. … Holmdel Builders Ass'n v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedIn Re Application of Zienowicz
12 N.J. Super. 563 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 1951
Howard v. Ragen, Warden, 59 F. Supp. 374 ( U.S.D.C., N.D. Ill., E.D., 1945). … Stagway v. Riker, 84 N.J.L. 201 ( Sup. Ct. 1913).
Cited 16 timesPublishedTownship v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.
378 N.J. Super. 485 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 2005
The municipal governing body may not judicially challenge the propriety of a particular board decision, provided the board of adjustment has acted within the ambit of its authority. Twp. of Stafford v. Stafford Twp. … Vidal v. Lisanti Foods, Inc., 292 N.J.Super. 555, 561-62 , 679 A. 2d 206 (App.Div.1996) (quoting Feiler v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedGreen v. Dept. of Institutions and Agencies
109 N.J. Super. 462 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1970
Tartaglio v. Department of Institutions and Agencies, 102 N.J. Super. 592, 594 (App. Div. 1968), app. dism. and certif. den. … See Solman v. Shapiro, 300 F. Supp. 409 (D. Conn. 1969), aff'd p.c. sub nom. Shapiro v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDavis v. New Jersey Dept. of Law
327 N.J. Super. 59 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1999
Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 811 (1968). … See, Hall v. Pennsauken Tp., supra, 176 N.J.Super. at 233-34 , 422 A. 2d 797 . Defendant's other asserted justifications prove even more illusory. As Justice Brennan noted in his dissent in Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna