Case law

Fdasmart, Inc. v. Dishman Pharmaceuticals (L-7832-13, Middlesex County and Statewide)

448 N.J. Super. 195 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 29, 2016

Daimler AG v. Bauman, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 134 S. Ct. 746, 754, 187 L. Ed. 2d 624, 633 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919, 131 S. Ct. 2846, 2851, 180 L. … In addressing the first factor, although there may be commonality of ownership between the parent and subsidiary, we have held that dominance "cannot be established by overlapping boards of directors."

Fieramosca v. Barnegat Tp.

335 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 2000

Duffcon Concrete Products, Inc. v. Cresskill, 1 N.J. 509, 515-16 , 64 A. 2d 347 (1949). Accordingly, a trial court must view the actions of the board as being presumptively correct. Rexon v. … Ientile v. Colts Neck Zoning Board, 271 N.J.Super. 326, 333-34 , 638 A. 2d 882 (App. Div.1994) (Skillman, concurring).

Shell Oil Co. v. Zoning Bd. Adj. Shrewsbury

127 N.J. Super. 60 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 21, 1973

The findings of a Board of Adjustment must be substantially grounded in sufficient competent evidence. Izenberg v. Board of Adjustment of City of Paterson, 35 N.J. Super. 583, 588 (App. Div. 1955); Dolan v. … See Rain or Shine Box Lunch Co. v. Newark Board of Adjustment, 53 N.J. Super. 252, 259 (App. Div. 1958); Yahnel v. Board of Adjustment, Jamesburg, supra, 79 N.J. Super., at p. 519. Moreover, as we stated in Cummins v.

Reed v. Reed

154 N.J. Super. 428 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 28, 1977

. *430 Reed v. Reed, Laszlo v. Laszlo and Wilson v. Wilson are divorce cases. … Painter v. Painter, 65 N. J. 196 (1974).

Wwp Dist. v. Bd. of Educ. of Delran

361 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2003

Super. 488 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the WEST WINDSOR-PLAINSBORO REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, MERCER COUNTY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. … Probst v. Bd. of Educ., 127 N.J. 518, 529 , 606 A. 2d 345 (1992). Because of its legislative charge, the State Board's decision on that question is entitled to great deference from us. See Board of Educ. v.

Keller v. Westfield

39 N.J. Super. 430 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 29, 1956

Dolan v. De Capua, 16 N.J. 599, 610 (1954); Second Reformed Church v. Bd. of Adjustment of Freehold, 30 N.J. Super. 338 ( App. … Beirn v. Morris, 14 N.J. 529, 536 (1954).

Fanwood v. Rocco

59 N.J. Super. 306 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 1960

Hudson Bergen County Retail Liquor Stores Ass'n v. Board of Com'rs of City of Hoboken, supra . … Grundlehner v. Dangler, 29 N.J. 256, 269 (1959); Bivona v. Hock, supra ; Board of Com'rs. of Borough of Belmar v. Division of Alcoholic *323 Beverage Control, supra.

DKM Residential Properties Corp. v. Township of Montgomery

363 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 15, 2008

E.g., Brock v. P.S.E. & G. Co., 149 N.J. 378, 383 , 693 A.2d 894 (1997); Bd. of Educ. of Tp. of Neptune v. Neptune Tp. Educ. Ass’n, 144 N.J. 16, 31 , 675 A.2d 611 (1996); Mayflower Secs. Co. v. … Costantino v.

State v. Jackson

326 N.J. Super. 276 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1999

State v. McCoy, 116 N.J. 293 , 561 A. 2d 582 (1989). There must be some substantial evidence tying the defendant to the drugs if possession is to be proved. See State v. … The preeminent case addressing the issue of actual or constructive possession is State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979).

State v. Morales

120 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1972

Super. 197 (1972) 293 A.2d 672 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. MIKE MORALES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MIKE MORALES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … See Bearden v. State of South Carolina, 443 F. 2d 1090, 1093 (4 Cir.1971); Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 254 , 318 F. 2d 225 , 238 (1963), cert. den. Thompson v.

Monte v. Milat

17 N.J. Super. 260 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1952

See Riley v. Trenton, 51 N.J.L. 498 ( Sup. Ct. 1889); Schwarz v. Dover, 70 N.J.L. 502, 505 ( Sup. Ct. 1904). … Pine v. Okzewski, 112 N.J.L. 429, 433 ( E. & A. 1934). The cases of Stark v. Fell, supra , and Hirsch v.

State v. Fraction

206 N.J. Super. 532 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1985

In addition, the judge assessed penalties totaling $50 payable to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. This appeal followed. Defendant seeks a reversal on a variety of grounds. … Vitale, 447 U.S. 410, 416 , 100 S.Ct. 2260, 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d 228, 235 (1980); Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 168-169 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2226-2227 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187, 195-196 ; Blockburger v.

Little Egg Harbor Tp. v. Bonsangue

316 N.J. Super. 271 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1998

The presumption of correctness of a county board's tax assessment judgment stands, until sufficient competent evidence to the contrary is adduced. Byram Township v. … Then the presumption in favor of county board's judgment ceases to have any artificial probative force. Borough of Rumson v. Peckham, 7 N.J.Tax 539, 549-550 (Tax Ct.1985).

State v. Ercolano

335 N.J. Super. 236 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 2000

Super. 236 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff, and Branchburg Township Board of Education, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neal ERCOLANO, Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Harvey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 30 N.J. 381, 391 , 153 A. 2d 10 (1959).

Battaglia v. BD. OF REVIEW, EMPLOYMENT SEC. DIV.

14 N.J. Super. 24 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 25, 1951

BATTAGLIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF THE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND ALLIED TEXTILE PRINTERS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … See Wellman v. Riley, 95 N.H. 507 , 67 A. 2 d 428 ( Sup. Ct., N.H. 1949); Moen v. Director of Division of Unemployment Security, 324 Mass. 246 , 85 N.E. 2 d 779 ( Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. 1949); Mattey v.

In Re Teaneck Board of Education

161 N.J. Super. 75 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 1978

Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473, 513 (1973), cert. den. Dickey v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 292 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 219 (1973). … Klein v.

Park Center v. Zoning Bd.

365 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 2, 2004

Super. 284 PARK CENTER AT ROUTE 35, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, Defendant-Respondent, and Dr. … In Fieramosca v.

In re Dykas

261 N.J. Super. 626 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1993

Simon v. Board of Trustees, 233 N.J.Super. 186, 195 , 558 A.2d 490 (App.Div.1989). Yet, a rule which does not contain a clear or objectively ascertainable standard may not be upheld. … Dep’t. of Human Services, 107 N.J. 355 , 526 A.2d 1055 (1987), the Board is clearly required to make its decisions on a rational, qualitative, and non-arbitrary basis. See Campbell v.

Cardinal Properties v. Westwood

227 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 1988

See PRB Enterprises, Inc. v. South Brunswick, supra at 8; Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. Livingston Tp. in Essex Cty., 199 N.J. Super. 470, 477 (App.Div. 1985). … ] In Exxon Co., U.S.A. v.

State v. City of Newark

87 N.J. Super. 38 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 1965

However, in Woodside Homes, Inc. v. Town of Morristown, 26 N. … Bianchi v. City of Newark, 53 N. J. Super. 66 (App. Div. 1958).