Case law

Owners v. Whittingham Homeowners

367 N.J. Super. 314 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2004

Super. 314 The OWNERS OF THE MANOR HOMES OF WHITTINGHAM, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … Chin v. Coventry Square Condo., 270 N.J.Super. 323, 328-29 , 637 A. 2d 197 (App.Div.1994). See also Siller v.

Hoek v. BD. OF ED. OF ASBURY PARK

75 N.J. Super. 182 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 1962

Newark Board of Education, 23 N.J. 364 (1957), and Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education, 35 N.J. 94 (1960), in support. … City of Wildwood v. Neiman, 44 N.J.

Fieramosca v. Barnegat Tp.

335 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 2000

Duffcon Concrete Products, Inc. v. Cresskill, 1 N.J. 509, 515-16 , 64 A. 2d 347 (1949). Accordingly, a trial court must view the actions of the board as being presumptively correct. Rexon v. … Ientile v. Colts Neck Zoning Board, 271 N.J.Super. 326, 333-34 , 638 A. 2d 882 (App. Div.1994) (Skillman, concurring).

Woodhull v. Manahan

85 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1964

of the board, any attempt by the board to create an office for the term of five years is illegal and void, citing Trowbridge v. … In Haight v. Love, supra, the appointment of the city collector was made by the board of finance and not, as here, by the central governing body of the town. The inference in Wilson v.

Wwp Dist. v. Bd. of Educ. of Delran

361 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2003

Super. 488 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the WEST WINDSOR-PLAINSBORO REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, MERCER COUNTY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. … Probst v. Bd. of Educ., 127 N.J. 518, 529 , 606 A. 2d 345 (1992). Because of its legislative charge, the State Board's decision on that question is entitled to great deference from us. See Board of Educ. v.

Sagarese v. Bd. of Health, Morristown

27 N.J. Super. 400 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 1, 1953

SAGARESE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. … Frank v. Board of Education, 90 N.J.L. 273 ( E. & A. 1917); Peoples Water Co. v. Millville, 95 N.J. Eq. 732 ( E. & A. 1923). Nor can the town's corporate powers be extended by the operation of the doctrine of estoppel.

Keller v. Westfield

39 N.J. Super. 430 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 29, 1956

Dolan v. De Capua, 16 N.J. 599, 610 (1954); Second Reformed Church v. Bd. of Adjustment of Freehold, 30 N.J. Super. 338 ( App. … Beirn v. Morris, 14 N.J. 529, 536 (1954).

Fanwood v. Rocco

59 N.J. Super. 306 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 1960

Hudson Bergen County Retail Liquor Stores Ass'n v. Board of Com'rs of City of Hoboken, supra . … Grundlehner v. Dangler, 29 N.J. 256, 269 (1959); Bivona v. Hock, supra ; Board of Com'rs. of Borough of Belmar v. Division of Alcoholic *323 Beverage Control, supra.

Vidal v. Lisanti Foods, Inc.

292 N.J. Super. 555 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 26, 1996

In Township of Dover v. Board of Adjustment of Dover, 158 N.J. … Lumund, [ v. Board of Adjustment of Rutherford ], 4 N.J. [577,] 583, 73 A. 2d 545 [1950].

State v. Jackson

326 N.J. Super. 276 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1999

State v. McCoy, 116 N.J. 293 , 561 A. 2d 582 (1989). There must be some substantial evidence tying the defendant to the drugs if possession is to be proved. See State v. … The preeminent case addressing the issue of actual or constructive possession is State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979).

State v. Morales

120 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1972

Super. 197 (1972) 293 A.2d 672 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. MIKE MORALES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MIKE MORALES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … See Bearden v. State of South Carolina, 443 F. 2d 1090, 1093 (4 Cir.1971); Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 254 , 318 F. 2d 225 , 238 (1963), cert. den. Thompson v.

Monte v. Milat

17 N.J. Super. 260 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1952

See Riley v. Trenton, 51 N.J.L. 498 ( Sup. Ct. 1889); Schwarz v. Dover, 70 N.J.L. 502, 505 ( Sup. Ct. 1904). … Pine v. Okzewski, 112 N.J.L. 429, 433 ( E. & A. 1934). The cases of Stark v. Fell, supra , and Hirsch v.

State v. Fraction

206 N.J. Super. 532 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1985

In addition, the judge assessed penalties totaling $50 payable to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. This appeal followed. Defendant seeks a reversal on a variety of grounds. … Vitale, 447 U.S. 410, 416 , 100 S.Ct. 2260, 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d 228, 235 (1980); Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 168-169 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2226-2227 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187, 195-196 ; Blockburger v.

Little Egg Harbor Tp. v. Bonsangue

316 N.J. Super. 271 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1998

The presumption of correctness of a county board's tax assessment judgment stands, until sufficient competent evidence to the contrary is adduced. Byram Township v. … Then the presumption in favor of county board's judgment ceases to have any artificial probative force. Borough of Rumson v. Peckham, 7 N.J.Tax 539, 549-550 (Tax Ct.1985).

State v. Ercolano

335 N.J. Super. 236 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 2000

Super. 236 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff, and Branchburg Township Board of Education, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neal ERCOLANO, Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Harvey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 30 N.J. 381, 391 , 153 A. 2d 10 (1959).

Demarest v. Mayor & Council of Bor. of Hillsdale

158 N.J. Super. 507 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 1978

He cannot substitute his own judgment for that of the municipal board invested with the power and duty to pass upon the application. Stolz v. Ellenstein, 7 N.J. 291 (1951); Peoples Trust Co., etc. v. … The action of the board is presumed to be valid. Rexon v. Haddonfield Bd. of Adj., 10 N.J. 1, 7 (1952); Bove v. Emerson Bd. of Adj., 100 N.J. Super. 95, 101 (App. Div. 1968).

Battaglia v. BD. OF REVIEW, EMPLOYMENT SEC. DIV.

14 N.J. Super. 24 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 25, 1951

BATTAGLIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF THE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND ALLIED TEXTILE PRINTERS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … See Wellman v. Riley, 95 N.H. 507 , 67 A. 2 d 428 ( Sup. Ct., N.H. 1949); Moen v. Director of Division of Unemployment Security, 324 Mass. 246 , 85 N.E. 2 d 779 ( Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. 1949); Mattey v.

In Re Teaneck Board of Education

161 N.J. Super. 75 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 1978

Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473, 513 (1973), cert. den. Dickey v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 292 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 219 (1973). … Klein v.

Medical Soc. v. NJ Dept. of Law

229 N.J. Super. 128 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1988

Swede v. City of Clifton, supra, 22 N.J. at 312 . … See DeFazio v. Haven Savings and Loan Ass'n., 22 N.J. 511, 519 (1956); Carlo v. The Okonite Callender Cable Co., 3 N.J. 253, 265 (1949); Marley v. Palmyra Bor., 193 N.J. Super. 271, 292 (Law Div. 1983).

Park Center v. Zoning Bd.

365 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 2, 2004

Super. 284 PARK CENTER AT ROUTE 35, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, Defendant-Respondent, and Dr. … In Fieramosca v.