Case law

Richter v. Oakland Bd. of Educ.

459 N.J. Super. 400 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 2019

See *1234 Raspa [v. … As the federal district court stated in Marrero v. Camden County Board of Social Services , 164 F.

State v. Bynum

259 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 5, 1992

Defendant did not testify, but presented his neighbor, Russell Brown, as a witness. Brown testified that Hatcher signalled defendant to stop and asked him to empty his pockets. … Summers, 452 U.S. 692, 696-701 , 101 S.Ct. 2587, 2590-94 , 69 L.Ed. 2d 340, 345-49 (1981); Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640-41 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 357, 361-62 (1979); Adams v.

Bolyard v. Berman

274 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1994

to Gagnon v. … Farrar v.

Keller v. Westfield

39 N.J. Super. 430 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 29, 1956

Dolan v. De Capua, 16 N.J. 599, 610 (1954); Second Reformed Church v. Bd. of Adjustment of Freehold, 30 N.J. Super. 338 ( App. … Beirn v. Morris, 14 N.J. 529, 536 (1954).

State v. Jackson

326 N.J. Super. 276 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1999

State v. McCoy, 116 N.J. 293 , 561 A. 2d 582 (1989). There must be some substantial evidence tying the defendant to the drugs if possession is to be proved. See State v. … The preeminent case addressing the issue of actual or constructive possession is State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979).

Patel v. Planning Bd.

258 N.J. Super. 437 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 1992

Medici v. BPR Co., 107 N.J. 1, 15 , 526 A. 2d 109 (1987); Kramer v. Board of Adj., Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 296 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965). … See Sheild v.

State v. Morales

120 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1972

Super. 197 (1972) 293 A.2d 672 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. MIKE MORALES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MIKE MORALES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … See Bearden v. State of South Carolina, 443 F. 2d 1090, 1093 (4 Cir.1971); Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 254 , 318 F. 2d 225 , 238 (1963), cert. den. Thompson v.

Matter of Allen

262 N.J. Super. 438 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1993

Although phrased in a variety of ways, the Township contends that (1) Allen's petitions to the Department of Personnel (DOP) and to the Board were untimely, (2) the Board lacked jurisdiction to interpret N.J.S.A. 43:16A-8 … Although it has been said that the 20 day time constraint contained in N.J.S.A. 11A:2-15 is jurisdictional and cannot be relaxed, Borough of Park Ridge v. Salimone, 21 N.J. 28 , 120 A. 2d 721 (1956); but see Jones v.

State v. Mickschutz

101 N.J. Super. 315 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 1968

State v. Wingler, 25 N.J. 161 (1957); State v. Newton, 30 N.J. Super. 382, 386 ( App. Div. 1954), affirmed 17 N.J. 271 (1955); State v. Thompson, supra, at p. 178. The purpose of the act is cure of a defendant. … State v. Johnson, supra, at p. 433.

In Re Galloway Township Board of Education

157 N.J. Super. 74 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 20, 1978

It maintains, in reliance upon N.L.R.B. v. … Bd. of Ed. v. Galloway Tp. Ed.

King v. New Jersey Dept. of Institutions & Agencies

124 N.J. Super. 518 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 1973

New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. Cahill, 349 F. Supp. 501 (D. N. J. 1972), for explanation of the difference between the manuals. … New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. Cahill, supra. Rather, the argument is made that the regulations are in conflict with the statute pursuant to which they were promulgated.

Little Egg Harbor Tp. v. Bonsangue

316 N.J. Super. 271 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1998

The presumption of correctness of a county board's tax assessment judgment stands, until sufficient competent evidence to the contrary is adduced. Byram Township v. … Then the presumption in favor of county board's judgment ceases to have any artificial probative force. Borough of Rumson v. Peckham, 7 N.J.Tax 539, 549-550 (Tax Ct.1985).

Park Center v. Zoning Bd.

365 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 2, 2004

Super. 284 PARK CENTER AT ROUTE 35, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, Defendant-Respondent, and Dr. … In Fieramosca v.

Owners v. Whittingham Homeowners

367 N.J. Super. 314 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2004

Super. 314 The OWNERS OF THE MANOR HOMES OF WHITTINGHAM, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … Chin v. Coventry Square Condo., 270 N.J.Super. 323, 328-29 , 637 A. 2d 197 (App.Div.1994). See also Siller v.

Illes v. Edison Tp. Zoning Bd. of Adj.

203 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 9, 1985

Adjustment v. … See Kotlarich v. Ramsey, 51 N.J. Super. 520, 540-541 (App.Div. 1958); Hamlin v. Matarazzo, 120 N.J. Super. 164, 175 (Law Div. 1972). See also Reid v. Hazlet Twp., 198 N.J.

Hoek v. BD. OF ED. OF ASBURY PARK

75 N.J. Super. 182 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 1962

Newark Board of Education, 23 N.J. 364 (1957), and Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education, 35 N.J. 94 (1960), in support. … City of Wildwood v. Neiman, 44 N.J.

Claudia Casser v. Township of Knowlton

441 N.J. Super. 353 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 2015

See Bhagat v. Bhagat, 217 N.J. 22, 38 (2014); Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 142 N.J. 520, 540 (1995). … v. Twp.

Woodhull v. Manahan

85 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1964

of the board, any attempt by the board to create an office for the term of five years is illegal and void, citing Trowbridge v. … In Haight v. Love, supra, the appointment of the city collector was made by the board of finance and not, as here, by the central governing body of the town. The inference in Wilson v.

Alperin v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Middletown Tp.

91 N.J. Super. 190 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 1966

Yahnel v. Board of Adjust. of Jamesburg, supra, 79 N.J. Super., at p. 519 . In Kramer v. … See also, Tzeses v. Board of Trustees of Village of South Orange, 22 N.J. Super. 45, 55 ( App.

Sagarese v. Bd. of Health, Morristown

27 N.J. Super. 400 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 1, 1953

SAGARESE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. … Frank v. Board of Education, 90 N.J.L. 273 ( E. & A. 1917); Peoples Water Co. v. Millville, 95 N.J. Eq. 732 ( E. & A. 1923). Nor can the town's corporate powers be extended by the operation of the doctrine of estoppel.