Case law

HAYES EX REL. HAYES v. Pittsgrove Tp. Bd. of Educ.

269 N.J. Super. 449 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1994

Culver v. Insurance Co. of North America, 115 N.J. 451, 456 , 559 A. 2d 400 (1989). Because a subrogee's rights can rise no higher than those of the subrogor, Mayfair Fabrics v. Henley, 101 N.J. … Kramer v. Sony Corp. of America, supra, 201 N.J. Super. at 319 , 493 A. 2d 36 .

Princeton Res. Lands v. Princeton Tp. Plan. Bd.

112 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1970

The Appellate Division in Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Planning Board of Princeton Tp., 98 N.J. … Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Planning Board of Princeton Tp., 52 N.J. 348 (1968).

Hamlin v. Matarazzo

120 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1972

Super. 164 (1972) 293 A.2d 450 MAHLON V. HAMLIN AND HELEN HAMLIN, PLAINTIFFS, v. … See Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 108-109 (1957); Summit *172 v. Horton Corp., 70 N.J. Super. 529, 537 (Ch. Div. 1961). Cf. Hopler v. Morris Hills Regional District, 45 N.J. Super. 409 (App.

Tripus v. Peterson

11 N.J. Super. 282 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1950

The New York courts have held that their statute does not create in the injured party a cause of action against the board of education. Massimilian v. … Rutkowsky v. Bozza, 77 N.J.L. 724 ( E. & A. 1909). However, construction in another state after its adoption is not of such conclusive effect. Gilman v.

Leahey v. Singer Sewing Co.

302 N.J. Super. 68 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1996

Postal Service Board of Governors v. Athens, 460 U.S. 711, 715-716 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). … Castellano v. Linden Board of Education, 158 N.J.Super. 350 , 386 A.2d 396 (App.Div.1978), rev’d on other grounds, aff'd in part, 79 N.J. 407 , 400 A.2d 1182 (1979); Gilchrist v.

New Brunswick v. Old Bridge

270 N.J. Super. 122 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 30, 1993

See, Kaufmann v. … Accordingly, the Board's resolution of March 2, 1993, must be vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings. V.

Campbell Soup Co. v. Bd. of Review

24 N.J. Super. 311 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1953

Grant Co. v. Board of Review, 129 N.J.L. 402 ( Sup. … Muraski v. Board of Review of U.C.C., 136 N.J.L. 472 ( Sup. Ct. 1948); Valenti v. Board of Review of U.C.C. of N.J., supra . There are no proofs as to these matters.

Smith v. Paquin

77 N.J. Super. 138 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 15, 1962

In Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 41 N.J. Super. 582 , 591 et seq. ( App. … Plaintiffs refer to our decisions in Kryscnski v. Shenkin, 53 N.J. Super. 590 (1959), and Burke v. Spring Lake Board of Adjustment, 52 N.J. Super. 498 ( App. Div. 1958), in support of their position.

Mountain Hill, LLC v. Tp. of Middletown

399 N.J. Super. 486 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 7, 2008

Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. … Plaintiff argues that Witt v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders, 94 N.J. 422 , 466 A. 2d 574 (1983), and South Harrison Township Committee v.

Reiser v. Pension Commission, Passaic Cty.

147 N.J. Super. 168 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1976

However, in Alexander Hamilton Hotel Corp. v. Board of Review, 127 N.J.L. 184 (Sup. … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545 (1949); Wilson v. Long Branch, 27 N.J. 360 (1958); Harvey v. Essex Bd. of Freeholders, supra; Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Glaser, supra .

State v. Kuhn

213 N.J. Super. 275 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 21, 1986

A Violent Crime Compensation Board penalty of $25 was also imposed. Defendant has acknowledged committing the offense. … See Brown v.

Verona v. Shalit

96 N.J. Super. 20 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1967

State v. Arbus, 54 N.J. Super. 76, 79-80 ( App. Div. 1959); Hewitt v. Hollahan, 56 N.J. Super. 372, 377 ( App. Div. 1959). … Since counsel who appeared for the Borough of Verona in fact spoke for the Board of Health (hereafter board), the board will be considered substituted as the plaintiff-appellant.

Grimes v. City of East Orange

288 N.J. Super. 275 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1996

Therefore the Board's decision on that question is not entitled to deference. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N.J. 85, 93 , 312 A. 2d 497 (1973). … De Muro v. Martini, 1 N.J. 516, 522 , 64 A. 2d 351 (1949). The principle is equally applicable to appointments of employees. See Cetrulo v.

Mocco v. Job

56 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 9, 1959

JAMES HALL AND PHOEBE HALL, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PASKO C. … See also Ward v. Scott, 11 N.J. 117 (1952), and Ward v. Scott, 16 N.J. 16, 18 (1954). It was also stated in Andrews, 30 N.J. at page 251 : "As pointed out in Grimley v. Ridgewood [ 45 N.J.

Trenton Times Corp. v. Bd. of Ed. of Trenton

138 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1976

Citizens for Better Ed. v. Camden Bd. of Ed., 124 N.J. Super. *361 523, 528 (App. Div. 1973). … Donaldson v. No. Wildwood Bd. of Ed., 65 N.J. 236 (1974), simply requires that a board of education honor a teacher's request for reasons for termination.

Glynn v. Park Tower Apartments, Inc.

213 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 22, 1986

Daaleman v. … See Abbott v. Burke, 100 N.J. 269 (1985).

Cartan v. Cruz Construction Co.

89 N.J. Super. 414 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1965

Brown, then sewer inspector of the Borough of Matawan, brought Cruz to plaintiff's office. … See Morton v. Reynolds, 45 N.J.L. 326 ( Sup. Ct. 1883); Wheelock v. Noonan, 108 N.Y. 179 , 15 N.E. 67 ( Ct. App. *420 1888); Brown v. Dellinger, 355 S.W. 2 d 742, 746 ( Tex. Ct. Civ. App. 1962); Gedekoh v.

Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.

21 N.J. Super. 370 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 13, 1952

I am also cognizant of the rule of Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Equalization, 76 N.J.L. 402 ( Sup. Ct. 1908), affirmed 78 N.J.L. 337 ( E. & A. 1909), and the pronouncement in Hillsborough Township v. … The rule was stated in Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Equalization, 76 N.J.L. 402 , at page 404 ( Sup.

In re 1984 General Election

203 N.J. Super. 563 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 1985

Kass v. Brown Boveri Corp., 199 N.J.Super. 42 (App.Div.1985). … Wene v. Meyner, 13 N.J. at 197 (1953).

Cullum v. Bd. of Ed., North Bergen Tp.

27 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 8, 1953

The notices given by the three members of the board did not comply with the board's own resolution. The special meeting held pursuant to such notice was illegal. Apgar v. Van Syckel, 46 N.J.L. 492 ( Sup. Ct. 1884). … Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co., 8 N.J. 433, 474 (1952).