Case law

Allstate Insurance v. Orthopedic Evaluations, Inc.

304 N.J. Super. 278 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 12, 1997

45:9-41.17 to -41.27 (Chiropractic Board Act), the overall authority of the Board of Medical Examiners “to regulate the practice of medicine and allied professions,” Del Tufo v. … which, in the absence of a statute with a specific limitation, is subject to the authority of the Board of Medical Examiners. See Del Tufo v. J.N., supra, 268 N.J.Super. at 296 , 633 A.2d 572 .

Bd. of Ed., Tp. of Rockaway v. ROCKAWAY TP. ED.

120 N.J. Super. 564 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 25, 1972

Super. 564 (1972) 295 A.2d 380 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY IN THE COUNTY OF MORRIS, A BODY CORPORATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. … The Board has a continuing obligation placed upon it by the Legislature to adopt and alter courses of study. In Wassmer v.

Condo v. BD. OF REVIEW, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY

158 N.J. Super. 172 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1978

Board of Review, 77 N.J. Super. 209, 213 (App. Div. 1962). In Krauss v. A. & M. … See Stonco v. Board of Review, 106 N.J. Super. 6, 10 (App. Div. 1969).

In Re Strauss

28 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1953

THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ESTATE OF FLORENCE R. … Riverview Gardens, Section One v. North Arlington Borough, 9 N.J. 167, 173 (1952). The judgment of the Division of Tax Appeals respecting the 1951 assessment is affirmed.

Star Enterprise v. Wilder

268 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 1993

King v. New Jersey Racing Comm'n, 103 N.J. 412, 422 , 511 A. 2d 615 (1986) (quoting Aurentz v. Planning Bd. of Township of Little Egg *375 Harbor, 171 N.J. Super. 135, 142-43 , 408 A. 2d 140 (Law Div. 1979)); Mastro v. … Board of Trustees of Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys., 266 N.J. Super. 445, 450 , 630 A. 2d 289 (App.Div. 1993); DiMaria v. Board of Trustees of Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys., 225 N.J.

Bolyard v. Berman

274 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1994

to Gagnon v. … Farrar v.

Matawan Regional Teachers Ass'n v. MATAWAN-ABERDEEN REGIONAL SCH. DIST. BD. OF EDUC.

223 N.J. Super. 504 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1988

In Barnert v. … In Eggers v.

Prunetti v. Mercer County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders

350 N.J. Super. 72 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 2001

The Board cites Gibson v. Board of Education of Newark, 205 N.J.Super. 48 , 500 A. 2d 27 (App.Div.1985) and Hiering v. … v.

DOVER-CHESTER ASSOC. v. Randolph

419 N.J. Super. 184 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 2011

Compare Huwang v. Twp. of Hillside, 21 N.J.Tax 496 (Tax 2004), and Wellington Belleville, L.L.C. v. Twp. of Belleville, 20 N.J.Tax 331 (Tax 2002), with United States Land Res. v. … The taxpayers rely upon Farrell v.

Hamlin v. Matarazzo

120 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1972

Super. 164 (1972) 293 A.2d 450 MAHLON V. HAMLIN AND HELEN HAMLIN, PLAINTIFFS, v. … See Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 108-109 (1957); Summit *172 v. Horton Corp., 70 N.J. Super. 529, 537 (Ch. Div. 1961). Cf. Hopler v. Morris Hills Regional District, 45 N.J. Super. 409 (App.

Sisler v. Courier-News Co.

199 N.J. Super. 307 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 1985

Another group of articles concerned a dispute between plaintiff and the Franklin Township Board of Adjustment when the Board rejected plaintiff's plan to build an apartment and shopping development in 1967, and his contentions … Brown, 98 N.M. 394 , 649 P. 2d 462 , cert. quashed 98 N.M. 336 , 648 P. 2d 794 (1982); Thomas H. Maloney & Sons, Inc. v. E.W.

S.S., on Behalf of Minor Child, T.S. v. Woodcliff Lake Board of Education

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 2026

Granata v. Broderick, 446 N.J. Super. 449, 468 (App. Div. 2016); Cummings v. Bahr, 295 N.J. Super. 374, 384 (App. … Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 243 (1998) (quoting Watkins v. Resorts Int'l Hotel & Casino, Inc., 124 N.J. 398, 415-16 (1991)).

Baptist Home of South Jersey v. Bor. of Riverton

201 N.J. Super. 226 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1984

Under our former zoning statutes, the absence of a planning board did not affect the validity of a zoning ordinance. Angermeier v. Sea Girt, 27 N.J. 298 (1955). … Thus, in Kohl v.

State v. Mickschutz

101 N.J. Super. 315 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 1968

State v. Wingler, 25 N.J. 161 (1957); State v. Newton, 30 N.J. Super. 382, 386 ( App. Div. 1954), affirmed 17 N.J. 271 (1955); State v. Thompson, supra, at p. 178. The purpose of the act is cure of a defendant. … State v. Johnson, supra, at p. 433.

Green v. Dept. of Institutions and Agencies

109 N.J. Super. 462 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1970

Tartaglio v. Department of Institutions and Agencies, 102 N.J. Super. 592, 594 (App. Div. 1968), app. dism. and certif. den. … See Solman v. Shapiro, 300 F. Supp. 409 (D. Conn. 1969), aff'd p.c. sub nom. Shapiro v.

Bd. of Ed. Piscataway Tp. v. Piscataway Main & Custodial Ass'n

152 N.J. Super. 235 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 12, 1977

Super. 235 (1977) 377 A.2d 938 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PISCATAWAY MAINTENANCE & CUSTODIAL ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … cites Hutchenson v.

HAYES EX REL. HAYES v. Pittsgrove Tp. Bd. of Educ.

269 N.J. Super. 449 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1994

Culver v. Insurance Co. of North America, 115 N.J. 451, 456 , 559 A. 2d 400 (1989). Because a subrogee's rights can rise no higher than those of the subrogor, Mayfair Fabrics v. Henley, 101 N.J. … Kramer v. Sony Corp. of America, supra, 201 N.J. Super. at 319 , 493 A. 2d 36 .

Morris v. Jersey City

179 N.J. Super. 460 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1981

The board's only connection in any respect was that it owned the building. No defect in the premises was suggested and no facts at all appear which might impose on the board any duty to supervise. Jackson v. … Law v. Newark Bd. of Ed., 175 N.J.

Hohorst v. Marion Bus Transp. Co., Inc.

5 N.J. Super. 279 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 27, 1949

Jersey City v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, 130 N.J.L. 309 ( Sup. Ct. 1943), relied on by appellants, is not in point. … Under such circumstances, this court will not disturb the adjudication of the board. Fornarotto v. Public Utility Commissioners, 105 N.J.L. 28 ( Sup. Ct. 1928). The order under appeal is affirmed. *Page 283

Tripus v. Peterson

11 N.J. Super. 282 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1950

The New York courts have held that their statute does not create in the injured party a cause of action against the board of education. Massimilian v. … Rutkowsky v. Bozza, 77 N.J.L. 724 ( E. & A. 1909). However, construction in another state after its adoption is not of such conclusive effect. Gilman v.