Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.24s

  • Harris v. Salem County Planning Bd.

    123 N.J. Super. 304 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1973

    FOWLER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE SALEM COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AND THE BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF SALEM, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 12, 1973. … Brazer v. Mountainside, 55 N.J. 456, 465-468 (1970); Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Planning Board, Princeton Tp., 52 N.J. 348, 350 (1968); Princeton Research Lands, Inc. v. Princeton Tp. Planning Bd., 112 N.J.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cumberland Cty. Welfare Bd. v. Rodriquez

    144 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 4, 1976

    CUMBERLAND COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. GEORGE H. … In Francis v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Albert F. Ruehl Co. v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, INDUS. ED.

    85 N.J. Super. 4 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 27, 1964

    MABEL BLUMENSCHINE, PLAINTIFF, v. … Accordingly, it was proper for defendant board of trustees to require it of all bidders. See William A. Carey & Co. v. Fair Lawn, 37 N.J. Super. 159, 166 ( App. Div. 1955); Tufano v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Morris Cty. F. Housing v. Boonton Tp.

    230 N.J. Super. 345 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 20, 1989

    MURWIN DEVELOPMENT CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. … N.A.A.C.P. v. Tp. of Mt. Laurel, 67 N.J. 151 (1975).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kryscnski v. Shenkin

    53 N.J. Super. 590 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1959

    Substantially similar situations were presented in Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94 (1957), reversing 41 N.J. Super. 582 ( App. Div. 1956); Rodee v. Lee, 14 N.J. … The same argument was made in Burke v. Spring Lake Board of Adjustment, recently decided by this court, 52 N.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lubliner v. Bd. of Alcoholic Bev. Con., Paterson

    59 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1960

    Russell v. Board of Adjustment of Tenafly, supra, 31 N.J., at page 67 ; Hudson Bergen County Retail Liquor Stores Ass'n v. Board of Com'rs. of City of Hoboken, 135 N.J.L. 502, 511 ( E. & A. 1947); Fanwood v. … Passarella v. Board of Comm., 1 N.J. Super. 313 ( App. Div. 1949).

    Modified by Lubliner v. BD. OF ALCOHOLIC BEV. CON., CITY OF PATERSON, 33 N.J. 428 (1960)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bednar v. Westwood Bd. of Educ.

    221 N.J. Super. 239 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 24, 1987

    Super. 239 (1987) 534 A.2d 93 CHARLES BEDNAR, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WESTWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 22, 1987. … Capodilupo v. West Orange Tp. Ed. Bd., supra . The State Board of Education attempted to fairly resolve a tension it perceived between tenure and seniority.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Earl v. Winne

    34 N.J. Super. 605 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 1955

    Italian Star Line v. U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 53 F. 2 d 359, 80 A.L.R. 576 (2 nd Cir. 1931). Regular and legitimate use of process, though with a bad intention, is not malicious abuse of process. … MacLean v. Naumkeag Trust Co., 268 Mass. 437 , 167 N.E. 748 ( Sup. Jud. Ct. 1929); Nelson v. National Casualty Co., 179 Minn. 53 , 228 N.W. 437 , 67 A.L.R. 509 ( Sup. Ct. 1929); Brown v. Robertson, 120 Ind.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Mount v. Trustees of Pub. Emp. Retirement Syst.

    133 N.J. Super. 72 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1975

    The board's purpose was only to suspend further payments pending resolution of the criminal charges. In Trap Rock Industries, Inc. v. … McFeely v. Board of Pension Com'rs, supra.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • In Re Brennan

    126 N.J. Super. 368 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 14, 1974

    Lane v. Holderman, 40 N.J. Super. 329, 338 (App. Div. 1956), mod. 23 N.J. 304 (1957); Newberry v. Neeld, 46 N.J. Super. 216, 220 (App. Div. 1957), certif. den. 25 N.J. 132 (1957); State v. … Ahto v. Weaver, 39 N.J. 418, 428 (1963); Schulman v. Kelly, 54 N.J. 364, 370 (1969). N.J. Const. (1947), Art.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Grodjesk v. Faghani

    198 N.J. Super. 449 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1985

    Cashen v. … State v.

    Modified on other grounds by Grodjesk v. Faghani, 104 N.J. 89 (1986)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Advance Electric Co., Inc. v. MONTGOMERY TP. BD. OF EDN.

    351 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 2002

    In Statewide Hi-Way Safety, Inc. v. … Inc. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Paul H. Jaehnig, Inc. v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.

    18 N.J. Super. 536 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 25, 1952

    Lavino & Co. v. National Surety Co., 104 N.J.L. 475 ( Sup. Ct. 1928); Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. Aetna, etc., Co., 110 N.J.L. 592 ( E. & A. 1933). … Doubtless the board had in mind court action of the kind involved in McCann v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co.

    30 N.J. Super. 585 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 28, 1953

    Ct. 1947); Hemel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 211 La. 95 , 29 So. 2 d 483 ( Sup. Ct. 1947); Atlas Assur. Co. v. Lies, 70 Ga. App. 162 , 27 S.E. 2 d 791 ( Ct. App. 1943); Kirkley v. Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. … Durback v. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Corp., supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bd. of Ed., Tp. of Rockaway v. ROCKAWAY TP. ED.

    120 N.J. Super. 564 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 25, 1972

    Super. 564 (1972) 295 A.2d 380 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY IN THE COUNTY OF MORRIS, A BODY CORPORATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. … The Board has a continuing obligation placed upon it by the Legislature to adopt and alter courses of study. In Wassmer v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Star Enterprise v. Wilder

    268 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 1993

    King v. New Jersey Racing Comm'n, 103 N.J. 412, 422 , 511 A. 2d 615 (1986) (quoting Aurentz v. Planning Bd. of Township of Little Egg *375 Harbor, 171 N.J. Super. 135, 142-43 , 408 A. 2d 140 (Law Div. 1979)); Mastro v. … Board of Trustees of Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys., 266 N.J. Super. 445, 450 , 630 A. 2d 289 (App.Div. 1993); DiMaria v. Board of Trustees of Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys., 225 N.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bolyard v. Berman

    274 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1994

    to Gagnon v. … Farrar v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Prunetti v. Mercer County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders

    350 N.J. Super. 72 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 2001

    The Board cites Gibson v. Board of Education of Newark, 205 N.J.Super. 48 , 500 A. 2d 27 (App.Div.1985) and Hiering v. … v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • DOVER-CHESTER ASSOC. v. Randolph

    419 N.J. Super. 184 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 2011

    Compare Huwang v. Twp. of Hillside, 21 N.J.Tax 496 (Tax 2004), and Wellington Belleville, L.L.C. v. Twp. of Belleville, 20 N.J.Tax 331 (Tax 2002), with United States Land Res. v. … The taxpayers rely upon Farrell v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Sisler v. Courier-News Co.

    199 N.J. Super. 307 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 1985

    Another group of articles concerned a dispute between plaintiff and the Franklin Township Board of Adjustment when the Board rejected plaintiff's plan to build an apartment and shopping development in 1967, and his contentions … Brown, 98 N.M. 394 , 649 P. 2d 462 , cert. quashed 98 N.M. 336 , 648 P. 2d 794 (1982); Thomas H. Maloney & Sons, Inc. v. E.W.

    Reversed on other grounds by Sisler v. Gannett Co., Inc., 104 N.J. 256 (1986)Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.