Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.04s
Burcam Corp. v. Planning Bd. Tp. of Medford
168 N.J. Super. 508 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 29, 1979
Super. 508 (1979) 403 A.2d 921 BURCAM CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MEDFORD; TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MEDFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … Morris v. Postma, 41 N.J. 354 , 362 (1964); Allendale Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Grosman, 30 N.J. 273, 277 (1959), app. dism. 361 U.S. 536 , 80 S.Ct. 587 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 538 (1960); Hill Homeowners Ass'n v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedEsso Standard Oil Co. v. Town of Westfield
33 N.J. Super. 324 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1954
Conlon v. Board of Public Works of City of Paterson, 11 N.J. 363, 366 (1953). See also Collins v. … Jones v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Long Beach Township, supra, 32 N.J. Super, at page 404. The test of spot zoning is laid down in Borough of Cresskill v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedChildren's Inst. v. Verona Tp. Bd.
290 N.J. Super. 350 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 1996
Sica v. … See Rowatti v. Gonchar, 101 N.J. 46, 51-52 , 500 A. 2d 381 (1985); Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. 268, 296 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965); Ward v. Scott, 16 N.J. 16, 23 , 105 A. 2d 851 (1954).
Cited 11 timesPublishedRek Investment Co. v. City of Newark
80 N.J. Super. 552 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 1963
The prior action of the county board, while entitled to a presumption of correctness, North Bergen Twp., Hudson County v. Dieckmann's Estate, 37 N.J. Super. 221 ( App. … Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N.J.L. 407 ( Sup. Ct. 1941).
Cited 67 timesPublished171 N.J. Super. 589 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 25, 1979
Axtell v. Caputo, 85 N.J. Super. 80 (App.Div.1964). … Wene v. Meyner, supra; Sharrock v. Keansburg, supra; A. G. v. Belleville, 81 N.J.L. 200 (Sup.Ct.1911).
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity of Perth Amboy v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.
91 N.J. Super. 305 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1966
Gloucester County Board of Taxation, 46 N.J. 55 , decided May 2, 1966; Town of Kearny v. Div. of Tax Appeals, 35 N.J. 299, 304 (1961); City of Passaic v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation, 18 N.J. 371, 385 (1955). … The county board's determination carries with it a presumption of correctness. Town of Kearny v. Div. of Tax Appeals, supra, 35 N.J., at p. 305 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedGunthner v. Planning Bd. of Bay Head
335 N.J. Super. 452 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 28, 2000
In Griggs v. … Zell v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHACKENSACK BD. OF EDUCATION v. City of Hackensack
63 N.J. Super. 560 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 1960
Town Council of Montclair v. Baxter, 76 N.J.L. 68 ( Sup. Ct. 1908); County of Monmouth v. Board of Com'rs of Long Branch, 2 N.J. Misc. 150 ( Sup. Ct. 1924). … The matter of raising money even for land was therefore not before the Mayor and Council, see Board of Education of Montclair v. Town Council of Montclair, 76 N.J.L. 59 ( Sup.
Cited 27 timesPublished348 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 2002
In Romaine v. … See also Farmer v.
Cited 9 timesPublished73 N.J. Super. 421 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 1962
N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.1; State v. Ingram, 67 N.J. Super. 21 ( Cty. Ct. 1961). … State v. Matchok, 14 N.J. Super. 359 ( App. Div. 1951).
Cited 2 timesPublishedEssex Cty. Welfare Bd. v. NJ Bell Tel. Co.
126 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1974
Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N.J. 589, 599 (1965); Clover Hill Swimming Club v. Goldsboro, 47 N.J. 25, 36 (1966). II. … See Close v. Kordulak, supra; Clover Hill Swimming Club v. Goldsboro, supra .
Cited 9 timesPublished346 N.J. Super. 408 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 10, 2002
She then noticed a crumpled brown paper bag, open at the top. … In Griffin v.
Cited 24 timesPublished241 N.J. Super. 367 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1990
See R. 1:3-4(b); Cabrera v. Tronolone, 205 N.J. Super. 268, 271 , 500 A. 2d 755 (App.Div. *371 1985), certif. den. 103 N.J. 493 , 511 A. 2d 666 (1986). … Alberti v. Civil Service Comm'n., 41 N.J. 147, 154 , 195 A. 2d 297 (1963); see also Calcaterra v. Calcaterra, 206 N.J. Super. 398, 402-403 , 502 A. 2d 1180 (App.Div. 1986). The appeal is therefore dismissed as untimely.
Cited 24 timesPublished37 N.J. Super. 206 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 6, 1955
App. 1949); Matthews-Carr v. Brown Exp., 217 S.W. 2 d 75, 77 ( Tex. Civ. App. 1948). … Brown Exp., supra ( 217 S.W. 2 d, at page 77); but see Goldberg v. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co., supra , stating that the admission creates a presumption ( 153 A., at page 813 ), L. Frank & Co., Inc., v. Illinois Cent. R.
Cited 12 timesPublishedMorgan v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employ. SEC.
77 N.J. Super. 209 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1962
Spatola v. Board of Review, 72 N.J. Super. 483, 484-485 ( App. Div. 1962); Marczi v. Board of Review, 63 N.J. Super. 75, 83-84 ( App. Div. 1960). … Mayo v. Unemployment Compensation *214 Board of Review, 196 Pa. Super. 573 , 176 A. 2 d 159 ( Sup. Ct. 1961). See also Krauss v. A. & M. Karagheusian, supra, 13 N.J., at p. 458 .
Cited 30 timesPublished315 N.J. Super. 298 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1998
The Board concluded the event was not "involuntary" under Kane v. … See, e.g., Ciecwisz v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement Sys., 113 N.J. 180, 182 , 549 A. 2d 1218 (1988); Maynard v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAllstate Insurance v. Orthopedic Evaluations, Inc.
304 N.J. Super. 278 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 12, 1997
45:9-41.17 to -41.27 (Chiropractic Board Act), the overall authority of the Board of Medical Examiners “to regulate the practice of medicine and allied professions,” Del Tufo v. … which, in the absence of a statute with a specific limitation, is subject to the authority of the Board of Medical Examiners. See Del Tufo v. J.N., supra, 268 N.J.Super. at 296 , 633 A.2d 572 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedScerbo v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Orange
121 N.J. Super. 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1972
BRENNAN, PLAINTIFFS, v. … See Healy v. Board of Appeals of Watertown, 356 Mass. 130 , 248 N.E. 2d 1 ( Sup. Jud. Ct. *390 1969), and Carson v. Board of Appeals of Lexington, 321 Mass. 649 , 75 N.E. 2d 116 ( Sup. Jud. Ct. 1947).
Cited 6 timesPublishedCondo v. BD. OF REVIEW, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
158 N.J. Super. 172 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1978
Board of Review, 77 N.J. Super. 209, 213 (App. Div. 1962). In Krauss v. A. & M. … See Stonco v. Board of Review, 106 N.J. Super. 6, 10 (App. Div. 1969).
Cited 46 timesPublishedIn Re Piscataway Township Board of Education
164 N.J. Super. 98 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 1978
Bd. of Ed. v. Union Cty. Teach. Ass'n, 145 N.J. Super. 435 (App. Div. 1976), certif. den. 71 N.J. 348 (1977), but cf. State of New Jersey v. … Bd. of Ed. v. Galloway Tp. Ass'n of Ed. Sec'ts, 78 N.J. 25 (1978). On the Board's appeal, both determinations of PERC are affirmed.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna