Case law

Whispering Woods v. Middleton Tp.

220 N.J. Super. 161 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 1987

The intervenors find support for their position in Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, Sea Girt, 80 N.J. Super. 454 (Law Div. 1963) and in Morton v. Mayor & Council of Twp. of Clark, 102 N.J. … Edelstein v. Asbury Park, 51 N.J. Super. 368, 389 (App.Div. 1958).

Allen v. Planning Bd. Tp. of Evesham

137 N.J. Super. 359 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1975

WOODEN, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … Ass'n v. Howell, 24 N.J. 488, 499 (1957).

State v. Wallach

296 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1996

See State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 , 126 A.2d 161 (1956). The case of Ufheil Const. Co. v. Boro. of Oradell, supra, 123 N.J.Super. at 268 , 302 A.2d 533 , on which defendants rely, is readily distinguishable. … Compare State v.

Herman v. BD OF ADJUST. PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS TP.

29 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 29, 1953

Sitgreaves v. Board of Adjustment of Nutley, 136 N.J.L. 21, 26 ( Sup. Ct. 1947); Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of Borough of Rutherford, 4 N.J. 577, 585 (1950); Brandt v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, Mt. Holly Tp., 16 N.J. … Board of Adjustment of Princeton, 133 N.J.L. 230 , 238 *167 ( Sup. Ct. 1945); Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Ocean Township, 9 N.J. 64, 76 (1952); Ward v. Scott, 11 N.J. 117, 121 (1952).

Busch v. Biggs

264 N.J. Super. 385 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1993

Cogdell v. … In Zaromb v. Borucka, 166 N.J.

In re Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

304 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1997

In Mobil Oil Corp. v. … See Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv.

Noble v. CHAIRMAN AND TP. COMMITTEE OF MENDHAM TP.

91 N.J. Super. 111 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 26, 1966

NOBLE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … Hohl v. Readington Tp., 37 N.J. 271, 279 (1962); Tice v. Borough of Woodcliffe Lake, 12 N.J. Super. 20, 25 ( App. Div. 1951).

Rosenthal v. STATE EMPLOYEES', SYSTEM OF NJ

30 N.J. Super. 136 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 1954

In the case of O'Keefe v. *141 Board of Trustees, etc., Retirement System, 131 N.J.L. 502 ( Sup. … Ervin v. Wohlfert, 76 N.J.L. 430 ( Sup. Ct. 1908); Matyas v. Yurko, 12 N.J. Misc. 715 ( Sup. Ct. 1934); Galligan v. Gonzales, 97 N.J.L. 327 ( E. & A. 1922); Berstecher v. Caruso, 89 N.J.L. 426 ( Sup. Ct. 1916).

Trantino v. NJ State Parole Bd.

331 N.J. Super. 577 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 2000

These decisions were rendered by the Parole Board upon the Supreme Court's remand of the Board's prior denial of parole to Trantino. See Trantino v. … State v. Funicello, 60 N.J. 60, 67-68 , 286 A. 2d 55 (1972), cert. denied, sub. nom., New Jersey v. Presha, 408 U.S. 942 , 92 S.Ct. 2849 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 766 (1972).

State v. Baez

238 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 22, 1990

State v. Valentin, 105 N.J. 14, 17-18 , 519 A. 2d 322 (1987). … State v. Meinken, 10 N.J. 348, 352 , 91 A. 2d 721 (1952). See also State v.

DeFelice v. ZONING BD. OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH

216 N.J. Super. 377 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 1987

Super. 377 (1987) 523 A.2d 1086 EDWARD DEFELICE AND AGNES DEFELICE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … The Board, in an attempt to justify its unusual decision, relies on V.F. Zahodiakin v. Summit, 8 N.J. 386 (1952) and North Plainfield v. Perone, 54 N.J.

City of Passaic v. Gera Mills

55 N.J. Super. 73 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 2, 1959

As was observed in Kearny v. State Board of Taxes, 103 N.J.L. 26, 28 ( Sup. … Co. v.

Maywood Ed. Assn. Inc. v. Maywood Bd. of Ed.

131 N.J. Super. 551 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1974

No. 3 v. Board of Ed., etc., 34 A.D.2d 351 , 312 N.Y.S. 2d 252, 256 (1970). … In Lynch v.

Catalpa Investment Group, Inc. v. Franklin Township

254 N.J. Super. 270 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 22, 1991

The board denied the application, finding that it lacked jurisdiction. The board’s resolution reciting the reasons for the denial states that the board relied on the decision in Dover Tp. v. Dover Tp. … Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCrane, 119 N.J.Super. 457, 470 , 292 A.2d 580 (Law Div.1971), aff d 61 N.J. 1 , 292 A.2d 545 (1972); cf. Tomko v. Vissers, 21 N.J. 226, 240 , 121 A.2d 502 (1956).

Planning Bd. Tp. of West Milford v. Tp. Council

123 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1973

See also Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil Service, 7 N.J. 509, 522 (1951). Cf. Talty v. Board of Education, Hoboken 10 N.J. 69, 71 (1952). … Handlon v. Belleville , Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil Service, Wagner v. Lodi, all supra. The planning board, being a quasi -judicial or administrative body, lacks the authority to adopt ordinances.

Cumberland Cty. Welfare Bd. v. Rodriquez

144 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 4, 1976

CUMBERLAND COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. GEORGE H. … In Francis v.

Bethlehem Bd. of Ed. v. Bethlehem Ed. Ass'n

177 N.J. Super. 479 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 1981

Super. 479 (1981) 427 A.2d 80 BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. LINDEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. … State v. Federanko, 26 N.J. 119, 129 (1958); North Bergen Tp. v. Lord, 131 N.J. Super. 280, 282 (App. Div. 1974). In sum, the holding in State v.

State v. Alston

312 N.J. Super. 102 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 29, 1998

On February 16, 1995, Detective Sabur went to Lamar Brown's place of employment and asked Brown to come to his office for questioning about the shooting. … State v. Irving, supra, 114 N.J. at 444-48 , 555 A. 2d 575 ; State v. Bankston, supra, 63 N.J. at 271 , 307 A. 2d 65 ; State v. Baker, 228 N.J.Super. 135, 140 , 549 A. 2d 62 (App.Div.1988).

M. v. S.

169 N.J. Super. 209 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1979

State v. Horton, supra . The county welfare board is an entity created by the county. N.J.S.A. 44:1-10. The county welfare board is composed of members appointed by the county board of chosen freeholders. … Lurry v. Mills, supra, 152 N.J. Super. at 131 . The fact that the welfare board receives funding from federal and state sources does not alter the fundamental character of the board.

Sudler v. Environ. Disposal Corp.

219 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 1987

STEINER, APPELLANTS, v. ENVIRONMENTAL DISPOSAL CORPORATION AND HILLS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, RESPONDENTS. SAMUEL SUDLER AND DAVID S. STEINER, RESPONDENTS, v. … In making that decision here the Board was confronted with the special factor of EDC's limited sewerage resources. In Wilfong v. Indiana Gas Co., Inc., 399 N.E. 2d 788 (Ind.