Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • Island Club Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Atlantic City

    298 N.J. Super. 516 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 1, 1995

    Nelson v. … In Faulhaber v. Tp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Flores v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF PUB. EMP. RET. SYS.

    287 N.J. Super. 274 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 13, 1996

    Maynard v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169 , 549 A. 2d 1213 (1988); Ciecwisz v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement Sys., 113 N.J. 180 , 549 A. 2d 1218 (1988); Kane v. … In support of its decision, the Board relies upon Barney v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement Sys., 238 N.J.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Busch v. Biggs

    264 N.J. Super. 385 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1993

    Cogdell v. … In Zaromb v. Borucka, 166 N.J.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Gerber v. Springfield Bd. of Educ.

    328 N.J. Super. 24 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 2000

    A local board of education is not entitled to immunity under the CIA. Hamel v. State, 321 N.J.Super. 67, 77 , 728 A. 2d 264 (App.Div.1999). … Rossi v. Borough of Haddonfield, 297 N.J.Super. 494, 498 , 688 A. 2d 643 (App.Div.), aff'd, 152 N.J. 43 , 702 A. 2d 1285 (1997). The above statute opens the Board itself to suit, but not the Board members.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • CAPP v. State, Div. of Elections

    344 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 10, 2001

    In Rainbow Coalition of Okla. v. … Rosen v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • LOIS SPAZIANI v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 2022

    A-4622-19 LOIS SPAZIANI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Because these were expert witnesses, the Board was able to make its own determination as to the probative value of the testimony. ZRB, LLC. v. N.J. Dep't of Env't. Prot., 403 N.J. Super. 531, 561-62 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Houdaille Con. Mats. v. Bd. of Ad. Tewksbury Tp.

    92 N.J. Super. 293 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1966

    See also Tullo v. Millburn Tp., supra (54 N.J. Super., at pp. 496-497); LaRue v. Township of East Brunswick, 68 N.J. Super. 435, 456 ( App. Div. 1961). … See North Plainfield v. Perone, supra ( 54 N.J. Super., at p. 11 ); Alperin v. Mayor, etc., of Middletown Tp., 91 N.J. Super. 190, 197 ( Ch. Div. 1966).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Paul Valentine v. the City of Cape May Zoning Board of Adjustment

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 2024

    Our review of the trial court's decision reversing the Board is de novo. 388 Route 22 Readington Realty Holdings, LLC v. Twp. of Readington, 221 N.J. 318, 338 (2015). … When we review a trial court's decision "regarding the validity of a local board's determination, 'we are bound by the same standards as was the trial court.'" Jacoby v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Visotcky v. City Council of Garfield

    113 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1971

    Cullum v. Board of Education, North Bergen Tp., 27 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. 1953). … Jones v. MacDonald, 33 N.J. 132, 138 (1960).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cochran v. Planning Bd. of Summit

    87 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1965

    The action of a planning board is only an initial step; it is not even required by law, Kozesnik v. … See Putney v. Township of Abington, 176 Pa. Super. 463 , 108 A. 2 d 134 ( Super. Ct. 1954). The case of Jones v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Long Beach Township, 32 N.J. Super. 397, 404 ( App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • SCC v. Lopez

    412 N.J. Super. 298 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 2010

    from the Zoning Board was required. … Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Betts v. Bd. of Adjustment of Linden

    72 N.J. Super. 213 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 1962

    Tomko v. Vissers, 21 N.J. 226, 237 (1956); Ward v. Scott, 11 N.J. 117, 126 (1952); Rexon v. Board of Adjustment, 10 N.J. 1 , *218 6-7 (1952); Preye v. Board of Adjustment, 22 N.J. Super. 161, 170 ( App. … Wajdengart v. Broadway-Thirty-Third Corp., 66 N.J. Super. 346, 352 ( App. Div. 1961); Herman v. Board of Adjustment, 29 N.J. Super. 164, 167 ( App. Div. 1953).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Toutphoeus v. Joy

    81 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1963

    As we stated in Preye v. Board of Adjustment, North Bergen Tp., 22 N.J. … Preye v. Board of Adjustment, North Bergen Tp., supra ; Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 106 (1957).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of Newark v. Benjamin

    144 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 1, 1976

    Springfield Tp. v. Bensley, 19 N.J. … A number of cases have passed upon the legality of boards of this type. In Harrington v. Tate, 435 Pa. 176 , 254 A. 2d 622 (Sup.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • New Jersey School Boards Ass'n v. State Health Benefits Commission

    183 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 1982

    The New Jersey School Boards Association, acting on behalf of 426 boards of education who are participants in the state health benefits program, and Ewing Township Board of Education, one of the 426 participating boards, … See Equitable Life Mort. v. N. J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Feiler v. Fort Lee Bd. of Adj.

    240 N.J. Super. 250 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1990

    Thus, the board of adjustment blatantly arrogated to itself the power to reject existing zoning and to substitute its idea of an appropriate zone plan. No board of adjustment has that power. Kaufmann v. … Lumund v. Bd. of Adj., Bor. of Rutherford, 4 N.J. 577, 583 , 73 A. 2d 545 (1950); see AMG Associates v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Slaughter

    213 N.J. Super. 123 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1986

    He said: As stated above, the recent decision in Essex County Welfare Board v. Hellams, supra , is clearly distinguishable. … There is provision for repayment under N.J.S.A. 44:10-4, but in Essex County Welfare Board v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Weeden v. City Council

    391 N.J. Super. 214 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 2007

    In Britwood Urban Renewal, LLC v. … Moreover, the zoning board may consult with the planning board if there is a question as to the design and intendment of the redevelopment plan. See Kenwood Assocs. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gloucester City v. AM. ARBITRATION ASS'N.

    333 N.J. Super. 511 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 11, 2000

    Super. 511 GLOUCESTER CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See Cruz-Mendez v. ISU/Ins.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Barbarisi v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF PATERSON

    30 N.J. Super. 11 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 23, 1954

    Adler v. Department of Parks, Irvington Township, 20 N.J. Super. *18 240 ( App. Div. 1952); Home Fuel Oil Co. v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Glen Rock, 5 N.J. Super. 63 ( App. Div. 1949); Home Fuel Oil Co. v. … Tzeses v. Board of Trustees of Village of South Orange, 22 N.J. Super. 45, 61 ( App. Div. 1952), certiorari denied Rush v. Board of Adjustment of Village of South Orange, 11 N.J. 327 (1953).

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.