Case law

Precision Industrial Design Co. v. Beckwith

185 N.J. Super. 9 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1982

As *15 pointed out in Polillo v. … See Gridco, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Tp. of Hillside, 167 N.J. Super. 348 (Law Div. 1979).

Jones v. East Windsor Reg. Bd. of Ed.

143 N.J. Super. 182 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 29, 1976

VAN NESS, PUBLIC ADVOCATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS, v. EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION AND ITS MEMBERS; RICHARD C. FRIEDMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A MEMBER OF SAID BOARD, AND LYNN B. … I do not consider the case referred to by plaintiffs, Cullum v. Board of Education, 15 N.J. 285 (1954), to be on point.

Union Cty. Bd. of Ed. v. Union Cty. Teach. Assn.

145 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1976

Super. 435 (1976) 368 A.2d 364 UNION COUNTY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. UNION COUNTY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, INC., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. … CRANFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT- APPELLANT, v. CRANFORD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 26, 1976.

State v. Mara

253 N.J. Super. 204 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1992

The record does not reveal that he was threatened with any consequence for failing to appear before the Board. Cf. Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 , 87 S.Ct. 616 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 562 (1967); Spevack v. … Warnings required by Miranda v. United States, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1966) do not apply to proceedings conducted before the Board or one of its committees. See also State v.

In Re Application of Meadowlands Communications Systems, Inc.

175 N.J. Super. 53 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 9, 1980

The Board has adopted the judicial standard of review of municipal decisions set out in the zoning case of Kramer v. … State v. Madden, 61 N.J. 377, 389 (1972).

EC, LLC v. Planning Bd. of Eastampton

354 N.J. Super. 171 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 20, 2002

Design Co. v. … Corp. v.

Barrett v. Union Tp. Committee

230 N.J. Super. 195 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1989

Thus, in Zell v. … Zell v. Borough of Roseland, supra , where a member of a planning board voted on a matter affecting a church of which he was but a member, causing the appellate court to invalidate the planning board's action.

Leon N. Weiner & Assocs., Inc. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST. OF GLASSBORO

144 N.J. Super. 509 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 1976

He cannot substitute his own judgment for that of the municipal board invested with the power and duty to pass upon the application. Stolz v. Ellenstein, 7 N.J. 291 (1951); Peoples Trust Co., etc. v. … The action of the board is presumed to be valid. Rexon v. Haddonfield Bd. of Adj., 10 N.J. 1, 7 (1952); Bove v. Emerson Bd. of Adj., 100 N.J. Super. 95, 101 (App. Div. 1968).

Hudanich v. Avalon

183 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1981

HUDANICH, PLAINTIFF, v. … Initially the action of the board is presumed to be valid, Kenwood Assoc. v. Englewood Bd. of Adj., 141 N.J.

Pillsbury v. BD. OF FREEHOLDERS OF MONMOUTH CTY.

140 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1976

PILLSBURY, ESQ., COUNTY COUNSEL OF THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH AND RICHARD T. O'CONNOR, ESQ., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. … The board urges that N.J.S.A. 40A:9-43 must give way to the disciplinary rule mentioned above, citing Winberry v. Salisbury, 5 N.J. 240 (1950).

Schulman v. O'Reilly-Lando

226 N.J. Super. 626 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1988

Super. 626 (1988) 545 A.2d 241 AARON SCHULMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BERNADETTE O'REILLY-LANDO, JERSEY CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL ESTIMATE AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. … State v. Butler, 89 N.J. 220, 226 (1982); Ingraham v. Travelers *630 Companies, 217 N.J. Super. 126, 129 (App.Div. 1987), aff'd o.b. 110 N.J. 67 (1988); Dacunzo v.

Yonadi v. Homestead Country Homes, Inc.

35 N.J. Super. 514 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1955

Lightcap v. Lehigh Valley R. Co. of New Jersey, 90 N. J. L. 620, 621 (E. & A. 1917). In accord see Nathanson v. Wagner, 118 N. J. Eq. 390, 395 (Ch. 1935); Sullivan v. Browning, 67 N. J. … Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Hudson, 84 N. J. L. 689 (E. & A. 1913); Jerolaman v. Town of Belleville, 90 N. J. L. 206 (E. & A. 1917); Cassini v. City of Orange, 107 N. J. Eq. 128 (Ch. 1930); Rooney v.

R & D REALTY v. Shields

196 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1984

Plaintiff's predecessor in interest, Carmen Brown, had executed a Housing Assistance Payments Contract (hereinafter referred to as H.A.P. … In Mitchell v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 569 F.

Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Ocean Twp.

56 N.J. Super. 310 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1959

Delawanna Iron & Metal Co. v. Albrecht, 9 N.J. 424 (1952); Schmidt *320 v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark, 9 N.J. 405 (1952). … Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark, supra, 9 N.J. at page 422.

Wash. Tp. Zon. Bd. v. Washington Tp. Planning Bd.

217 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1987

Super. 215 (1987) 525 A.2d 331 WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. … In Bergen County v. Port of N.Y.

State v. Wallach

296 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1996

See State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 , 126 A.2d 161 (1956). The case of Ufheil Const. Co. v. Boro. of Oradell, supra, 123 N.J.Super. at 268 , 302 A.2d 533 , on which defendants rely, is readily distinguishable. … Compare State v.

La Polla v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF UNION CO.

71 N.J. Super. 264 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 13, 1961

Ct. 1885) (steward of county almshouse); Brodman v. Rade, 101 N.J.L. 207 ( E. & A. 1925) (secretary of local board of health); Fredericks v. Board of Health of Town of West Hoboken, 82 N.J.L. 200 ( Sup. … In the early case of Greene v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County, 44 N.J.L. 388 ( Sup.

State v. Bradshaw

170 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 2, 1979

First, unlike Brown v. Illinois or Dunaway v. New York, defendant in the instant case was not originally brought to police headquarters for questioning. In Davis v. … In sum, the case at bar is clearly distinguishable from Brown v. Illinois and Dunaway v. New York.

In Re Bell Atlantic New Jersey, Inc.

342 N.J. Super. 439 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 13, 2001

Co. v. … Corp. v.

Independent Oil Workers v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

82 N.J. Super. 159 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1964

Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille, attorneys). Mr. F. Morse Archer, Jr., for defendant ( Messrs. Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read, attorneys). WICK, J.S.C. … Rather, he read the bulletin board in the morning because he worked in a standard area.