Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • McNally v. Providence Washington Insurance

    304 N.J. Super. 83 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 1997

    In my capacity as a Christian Brother, I have taken a vow of poverty and rely entirely on CBI for room, board and financial support. … Brown v. Brown, 208 N.J.Super. 372, 381-82 , 506 A.2d 29 (App. Div.1986).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Powers v. Union City Bd. of Ed.

    124 N.J. Super. 590 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 5, 1973

    Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, 28 N.J. 582, 586 (1959); Bryant, Adm'x. v. Fissell, 84 N.J.L. 72, 76 (Sup. Ct. 1913); Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co., 115 N.J.L. 43, 47 (Sup. Ct. 1935); Argroe v. Marinaccio, 63 N.J. … Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Ocean Tp., 9 N.J. 64, 77 (1952); Behnke v. New Jersey Highway Authority, 13 N.J. 14, 24 (1953); Mahoney v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Pleasantville Taxpayers v. City of Pleasantville

    115 N.J. Super. 85 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1971

    Becker, Inc. v. Marlboro Tp., 82 N.J. Super. 519, 529 (App. Div. 1964). Cf. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western R.R. Co. v. Neeld, 23 N.J. 561, 575 (1957). … Becker, Inc. v. Marlboro Tp., supra, 82 N.J. Super. at 529 . Plaintiffs cite Baldwin Const. Co. v. Essex County Bd. of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329 (1954) and Ridgefield Park v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Klinger v. Cranbury Tp. Bd. of Ed.

    190 N.J. Super. 354 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 10, 1982

    Super. 354 (1982) 463 A.2d 948 RICHARD KLINGER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Seidel v. Ventnor City Bd. of Ed., 110 N.J.L. 31 (Sup.Ct. 1933), aff'd o.b., 111 N.J.L. 240 (E. & A. 1933); Kearny Bd. of Ed. v. Horan, 11 N.J. Misc. 751 (Sup.Ct. 1933).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Elizabeth Bd. of Educ. v. NJT CORP.

    342 N.J. Super. 262 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 25, 2001

    Super. 262 ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See Cohen v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Transit Rail v. Cleaning Services

    277 N.J. Super. 367 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1994

    v. … Brown, 208 N.J. Super. 372, 377-378 , 506 A. 2d 29 (App.Div. 1986).] The purpose of this doctrine is to promote fairness to the parties, judicial economy and efficiency within the court system. Cogdell v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rochinsky v. State

    214 N.J. Super. 525 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1986

    Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 577 (1981) (citing Costa v. Josey, 83 N.J. 49, 59 (1980)). … Brown v. Brown, supra, 86 N.J. at 577 . Subsection d “involves the exercise of discretion when, in the face of competing demands, the governmental body determines whether and how to utilize existing resources.” Ibid.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Riedel v. Sheeran

    73 N.J. Super. 105 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 1962

    Boulevard Improvement Company v. Academy Associates, Inc., 3 N.J. Super. 506 ( Law Div. 1949); cf. Board of Education of Borough of Fort Lee v. Mayor, etc., of Fort Lee, 31 N.J. Super. 22 ( App. Div. 1954). … Public Service Railway Co. v. *114 Camden, 95 N.J.L. 190 ( E. & A. 1920). In Tortorello v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re Elizabethtown Water Co.

    205 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 27, 1985

    In Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. R.R. … Inasmuch as the Supreme Court in In re Lambertville Rates v. N.J. Bd. Pub. Util.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Griffin Const. Corp. v. Bd. of Adjust. of Teaneck

    85 N.J. Super. 472 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1964

    Of the reported cases, see Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94 (1957); Burke v. Spring Lake Board of Adjustment, 52 N.J. Super. 498 ( App. Div. 1958); Kryscnski v. Shenkin, 53 N.J. Super. 590 ( App. … See Mischiara v. Board of Adjustment, Piscataway Tp., supra .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • D'ANNA v. Planning Bd. of Wash. Tp.

    256 N.J. Super. 78 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1992

    Super. 78 (1992) 606 A.2d 417 FRANK D'ANNA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Allied Realty v. Borough of Upper Saddle River, supra, 221 N.J. Super. at 418 , 534 A. 2d 1019 ; see also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Fortunato, 248 N.J.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bd. of Ed. of Fort Lee v. Mayor, Etc., of Fort Lee

    31 N.J. Super. 22 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 4, 1954

    Major argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant, Board of Education of the Borough of Fort Lee. Mr. William V. … Peckitt v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Spring Lake, 136 N.J.L. 405 ( Sup.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Township Pharmacy v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services

    432 N.J. Super. 273 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 22, 2013

    Soc’y for the Prev. of Cruelty to Animals v. N.J. Dep’t of Agric., 196 N.J. 366, 384-85 , 955 A.2d 886 (2008) (citing Henry v. Rahway State Prison, 81 N.J. 571, 579-80 , 410 A.2d 686 (1980)). … Corp. v. Open MRI of Fairview, 352 N.J.Super. 216, 227 , 799 A.2d 731 (Law Div.2002)).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • LAUREN URUSOW v. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 2022

    A-4210-19 LAUREN URUSOW, Appellant, v. … "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, courts are obliged to accept them.'" Ibid. (quoting Self v. Bd. of Rev., 91 N.J. 453, 459 (1982)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Naseef v. Cord, Inc.

    90 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1966

    . *137 Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN. Mr. Bernard I. Kramer argued the cause for petitioner. Mr. Charles Handler argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Samuel H. Berlin, of counsel and on the brief). … governing body of the municipality granting the same, after notice and hearing, whenever it shall appear that the person to whom the consent was granted has failed * * * to comply with any terms or conditions imposed by the board

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Chicalese v. Monroe Tp. Plan. Bd.

    334 N.J. Super. 413 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 2000

    See generally, Loechner v. Campoli, supra ; Chirichello v. Zoning *909 Board of Adjustment of Borough of Monmouth Beach, 78 N.J. 544 , 397 A. 2d 646 (1979); Dalton v. … Ocean Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, 245 N.J.Super. 453 , 586 A. 2d 262 (App.Div.1991); Bridge v. Neptune Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra; Somol v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Rooney v. West Orange Tp.

    200 N.J. Super. 201 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 1985

    Super. 201 (1985) 491 A.2d 23 JOHN ROONEY, PLAINTIFF, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND WEST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND WILLIAM CECERE, DEFENDANT. … Co. v. Farmers Ins.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Debra Suzette Grimm v. Wall Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 2023

    See Cohen v. Thoft, 368 N.J. Super. 338, 345-47 (App. … Jock v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Wall, 184 N.J. 562, 597 (2005); see also Price v. Himeji, LLC, 214 N.J. 263, 284 (2013).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bzozowski v. Penn.-Reading Seashore Lines

    107 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 1969

    The United States Supreme Court, in Jencks v. … Lakewood Trust Co. v. Fidelity and Deposit Co., 81 N.J. Super. 329 ( Law Div. 1963). Further, in Guarriello v. Benson, 90 N.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp.

    68 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1961

    This planning board is known in the law as a "Weak Board." … Grogan v. DeSapio, 11 N.J. 308 (1953); Giannone v. Carlin, 20 N.J. 511 (1955).

    Cited 46 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.