Case law

State v. Lagares

247 N.J. Super. 392 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1991

Brown v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1, 11 , 297 A. 2d 572 (1972). As the Court in State v. … In Brown v.

Rosario v. Haywood

351 N.J. Super. 521 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 2002

Mariani and Mariani Electric, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Borough of Ramsey, Third-Party Defendant, and Ramsey Board of Education, Third-Party Defendant/Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Co. v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 292 N.J.Super. 365, 377 , 678 A. 2d 1152 (App.Div.1996) (citing Diamond Shamrock Chems. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.

Medical Realty v. Bd. of Adjustment

228 N.J. Super. 226 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 27, 1988

Super. 226 (1988) 549 A.2d 469 MEDICAL REALTY ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF SUMMIT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. … We expressed our disapproval of this holding in Lazovitz v. Board of Adjustment, 213 N.J. Super. 376 (App.Div. 1986) as follows: Moreover, we disagree with the holding of Baptist Home of South Jersey v.

VSH Realty, Inc. v. Harding Township

291 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 1996

Lemke v. Bailey, 41 N.J. 295, 301 , 196 A.2d 523 (1963); Jersey City Incinerator Auth. v. Department of Pub. … And see Glen Wall Assocs. v.

YWCA v. Bd. of Adj. Summit

134 N.J. Super. 384 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 18, 1975

Super. 384 (1975) 341 A.2d 356 YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SUMMIT, NEW JERSEY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF SUMMIT AND MARTIN J. … Beirn v. Morris, 14 N.J. 529, 535 (1954).

Sahli v. Woodbine Bd. of Educ.

386 N.J. Super. 533 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 19, 2006

Super. 533 Ronald SAHLI, Esq., Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. … City of Hoboken v. Gear, 27 N.J.L. 265 (Sup.Ct.1859); Stuhr v. Curran, 44 N.J.L. 181 (E. & A. 1882). In that connection, it was stated in Fredericks v.

Sanner v. Ford Motor Co.

144 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 1976

SANNER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided August 6, 1976. *2 Mr. Morris Brown for plaintiffs ( Messrs. … Dreisonstok v. Volkswagenwerk, A.C., 489 F. 2d 1066 (4 Cir.1974); Chestnut v. Ford Motor Co., 445 F. 2d 967 (4 Cir.1971); Lamendola v. Mizell, 115 N.J.

In the Matter of the Implementation of L. 2012, C. 24

443 N.J. Super. 73 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 12, 2015

Elec. & Gas Company's Rate Unbundling, 167 6 A-4565-13T3 N.J. 377, 384 (2001); SJC Builders, LLC v. N.J. Dep't of Envtl. … State v. Drury, 190 N.J. 197, 212 (2007) (quoting State v. Sutton, 132 N.J. 471, 483 (1993)).

Bd. of Taxation of Essex Co. v. Belleville Cty.

92 N.J. Super. 338 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 10, 1966

In interpreting the language granting powers to the county boards of taxation, the court in Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 28 N.J. Super. 110 ( App. … render that board impotent. *343 Highly indicative of the approach which the highest court of this state took in a related matter is the case of Switz v.

Rosalie Bacon v. New Jersey State Department

443 N.J. Super. 24 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 6, 2015

(citing Abbott v. Burke, 153 N.J. 480, 567 (1998) (Abbott V)). … remediating the constitutional violation found by [the Board] and upheld by 3 On May 7, 2012, the Supreme Court denied plaintiffs' petition for certification from this order. Bacon v. N.J.

State v. Smith

307 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 29, 1997

Sidoti, 134 N.J.Super. 426, 430-31 , 341 A.2d 670 (App.Div.1975); State v. Brown, 113 N.J.Super. 348, 353 , 273 A.2d 783 (App.Div.1971). … Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 440, 94 S.Ct. 2357, 2361 , 41 L.Ed.2d 182, 190 (1974). Coercive government misconduct was the catalyst for the United States Supreme Court seminal confession case, Brown v.

Garrison v. Garrison

15 N.J. Eq. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1858

Le Breton v. Fletcher, 2 Hagg. 568; Lowe v. Jolliffe, 1 Sir Wm. Bl. 365; Shelford on Lunacy 54, 55. … (H all v. Warren, 9 Ves. jun. 610.)

Beck v. Bluestein

194 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1984

Ferry v. Williams, 41 N.J.L. 332 (Sup.Ct. 1879); Taxpayers Association v. City of Cape May, 2 N.J. Super. 27 (App.Div. 1949); Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer County, 76 N.J. … Accord Nero v. Hyland, 76 N.J. at 221-222 ; Citizens For Better Ed. v. Bd. of Ed. Camden, 124 N.J. Super. at 528 .

O'Connor v. Harms

111 N.J. Super. 22 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1970

Thus, it was held in McIntosh v. … Jenkins v. Fowler, 24 Pa. 308 (Sup.

Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.

24 N.J. Super. 252 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1952

Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision, 284 U.S. 23 , 52 S.Ct. 48, 50 , 76 L.Ed. 146 (1931). In 1927 and again in 1934, long after the decision in Sioux City Bridge Co. v. … State Board, 104 N.J.L. 48 ( Sup. Ct. 1927); Lehigh Valley Ry. Co. v. State Board, 12 N.J. Misc. 673 ( Sup.

Gandolfi v. Town of Hammonton

367 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 2004

First, citing Orloski v. … Board of Adjustment, Sea Girt, 80 N.J.Super. 454 , 194 A. 2d 26 (Law Div.1963) and Morton v.

State v. Baskerville

324 N.J. Super. 245 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 31, 1999

In United States v. … See United States v.

Brunt v. Bd. of Trs.

455 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 2018

The Board of Trustees of the Police and Firemen's Retirement System ("Board") subsequently adopted the ALJ's decision. … Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v.

In Re Shelton College

109 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 7, 1970

Shelton College argues on this appeal that the decision of the Board is erroneous and contrary to law. Reliance is placed on Asbury Park v. … F.T.C. v. Flotill Products, Inc., 389 U.S. 179 , 88 S.Ct. 401 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 398 (1967); Younger Brothers, Inc. v. United States, 238 F. Supp. 859 (S.D. Tex. 1965); Younkin v. Boltz, 241 Md. 339 , 216 A. 2d 714 (Md. Ct.

Wolf v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. of Park Ridge

79 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 1963

For reasons which have been explained too many times in the past to require restatement now, the action of the board is fatally defective and must be set aside. See Tomko v. Vissers, 21 N.J. 226 (1956); Dolan v. … Lamb v. A.D. McKee, Inc., 10 N.J. Misc. 649 ( Sup. Ct. 1932)." The case will therefore be remanded to the board of adjustment.