Case law

Oak Hill Investors, LLC v. Howell Township Rent Stabilization and Control Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 2025

Courts grant the decisions of municipal boards substantial deference, with a presumption that a rent control board's factual determinations are valid, and that the board has acted "fairly." Kramer v. … Therefore, our review of a municipal board's action "is usually limited," and a reviewing court should not substitute its judgment for that of the board. See Kauffmann v. Plan.

Rutgers University Student Assembly (Rusa) vs.

446 N.J. Super. 221 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2016

Pointing to the deposition testimony of the chief clerk of the county board of elections, the judge found that it took the board seven full days, with thirty employees overtime, before it completed its review of 5617 … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730, 39 L. Ed. 2d 714, 94 S. Ct. 1274 (1974). [Id. at 433, 112 S. Ct. at 2063, 119 L. Ed. 2d at 252-53 (alteration in original).]

Tzeses v. Bd. of Trustees of South Orange

22 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 6, 1952

further proceedings by the board, as was done in Brandon v. … Ramsbotham v. Board of Public Works of Paterson, 2 N.J. 131, 135 (1949).

Bor. of Matawan v. Tree Haven Apartments, Inc.

108 N.J. Super. 111 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1969

Board of Equalization of Taxes, 74 N.J.L. 753, 759 ( E. & A. 1907), and Shillingsburg v. Greenwich, 83 N.J.L. 129, 131 ( Sup. Ct. 1912). … Borough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 125 N.J.L. 37, 40 ( E. & A. 1940); Borough of North Arlington v. Riverview Gardens, 25 N.J. Misc. 466 , 55 A. 2 d 303 (Div. of Tax App. 1947).

Grillo v. Bd. of Realtors of Plainfield Area

91 N.J. Super. 202 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1966

Hudson Bergen County Retail Liquor Stores Ass'n v. Board of Comm'rs, City of Hoboken, 135 N.J.L. 502, 510 ( E. & A. 1947); and see Walker v. Borough of Stanhope, 23 N.J. 657 (1957); Di Cristofaro v. … The Board and its members are acting in combination. That combination is a restraint of trade. As Mr. Justice Brandeis observed in Board of Trade of City of Chicago v.

Marrocco v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Passaic

5 N.J. Super. 94 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1949

Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton, supra, at pp. 238, 239. … Ramsbotham v. Board of Public Works, 2 N.J. 131 ( Sup. Ct. 1949); Scerbo v. Board of Adjustment of Jersey City, 4 N.J. Super. 409 , 67 A.2d 472 ( App. Div. 1949).

Carlia M. Brady v. Board of Trustees of the Judicial Retirement System

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 12, 2025

See O'Connell v. … As part of the analysis, the Board applied the Supreme Court's rationale in Patterson v.

I/M/O Town of Harrison and Fraternal Order of Police, lodge No. 116

440 N.J. Super. 268 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 2015

V, § 1, ¶ 11). … appeal to the PFRS Board of Trustees); Hemsey v.

Mastriana v. NJ Parole Bd.

95 N.J. Super. 351 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 1967

White v. Parole Board of State of N.J., 17 N.J. Super. 580, 586 ( App. Div. 1952); In re Domako, 9 N.J. 443, 445 (1952), certiorari denied Domako v. … N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.19. *357 This the Board has done. The procedure of the Board "is a matter of state policy exclusively for the State to decide," Mahoney v.

Upper Penns Neck Tp. v. Lower Penns Neck Tp.

20 N.J. Super. 280 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1952

In Stemmler v. … This is the case of Brown v. Arkansas City, 135 Kan. 453 , 11 P. 2 d 607, 608 ( Sup. Ct. Kan. 1932).

State v. Lewis

389 N.J. Super. 409 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 11, 2007

Throughout the trial, from the beginning to the very end, defendant conceded that he killed Brown. See State v. … In State v.

Zell v. Borough of Roseland

42 N.J. Super. 75 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1956

Wiesenthal v. Atlantic City, 73 N.J.L. 245 ( Sup. Ct. 1906); and see Cobble Close Farm v. Board of Adjustment of Middletown, 10 N.J. 442, 454 (1952). … Since the statute requires zoning amendments to be submitted for planning board action as a prerequisite to adoption by the municipality, N.J.S.A. 40:55-33, Hasbrouck Heights Hosp. Ass'n v.

State v. Smith

307 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 29, 1997

Sidoti, 134 N.J.Super. 426, 430-31 , 341 A.2d 670 (App.Div.1975); State v. Brown, 113 N.J.Super. 348, 353 , 273 A.2d 783 (App.Div.1971). … Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 440, 94 S.Ct. 2357, 2361 , 41 L.Ed.2d 182, 190 (1974). Coercive government misconduct was the catalyst for the United States Supreme Court seminal confession case, Brown v.

Izenberg v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Paterson

35 N.J. Super. 583 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1955

Skaf v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Asbury Park, supra. … Skaf v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Asbury Park, supra.

Point Pleasant Beach Teachers Ass'n v. Callam

173 N.J. Super. 11 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1980

Schulz v. State Bd. of Ed., 132 N.J.L. 345 (E. & A. 1945); Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Ed., 139 N.J. Super. 175 (App.Div. 1976), aff'd o.b. 73 N.J. 37 (1977). … Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Ed., supra at 177.

East Orange v. BD. OF WATER COM'RS OF EAST ORANGE

73 N.J. Super. 440 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1962

Defendant board of water commissioners cites the case of Upham v. Plankinton, 152 Wis. 275 , 140 N.W. 5 , 48 L.R.A., N.S., 1004 ( Sup. Ct. 1913), and the case of Trust Company of New Jersey v. … Vogt v. Borough of Belmar, 14 N.J. 195 (1954). In Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v.

Lionel's Appliance Center, Inc. v. Citta

156 N.J. Super. 257 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1978

In Kozesnik v. … Thus, in Wilson v.

Bd. of Ed. Tp. N. Bergen v. N. Bergen Fed. Tchrs.

141 N.J. Super. 97 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1976

Super. 97 (1976) 357 A.2d 302 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. … Fac. v. N.J. Bd. of Ed., 66 N.J. 72 (1974). The Federation relies, in part, on Porcelli v. Titus, 108 N.J. Super. 301 (App.

Jersey City v. Division of Tax Appeals

5 N.J. Super. 375 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 1949

Brower v. Franklin Tp., 119 N.J.L. 417 ( Sup. Ct. 1938); Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation, 125 N.J.L. 431 ( E. A. 1940). … Co. v. Board of Equalization, 76 N.J.L. 402 ; affirmed, 78 Id. 337 (1909). The County Board of Taxation is specially directed to secure the taxation of all property in the county at its true value.

Winston v. Bd. Ed. So. Plainfield

125 N.J. Super. 131 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 9, 1973

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Zimmerman v. Board of Education, Newark, 38 N.J. 65 (1962), cert. den. 371 U.S. 956 , 83 S.Ct. 508 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Donaldson v. … Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2964 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 570 (1972); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); cf. Burlington County Evergreen Park Mental Hospital v.