Case law

Public Advocate Dep't v. Public Utilities Bd.

189 N.J. Super. 491 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 1983

Super. 491 (1983) 460 A.2d 1057 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE, APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENTS. COUNTY OF BERGEN, APPELLANT, v. … Transport v.

El Shaer v. PLANNING BD. OF TP. OF LAWRENCE

249 N.J. Super. 323 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1991

See Baghdikian v. Board of Adjustment of Bor. of Ramsey, 247 N.J. Super. 45, 50 , 588 A. 2d 846 (App.Div. 1991). … Co. v.

Gargiulo v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance

265 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 1993

Meyer, 79 N.J.Super. 194, 196 , *228 191 A.2d 182 (App.Div.1963); Clarke v. Brown, 101 N.J.Super. 404, 413-14 , 244 A.2d 514 (Law Div.1968). … In Cheatham v.

In re Middlesex Reg'l Educ. Servs. Comm'n Name Change Request

453 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 2018

Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v. … Co. v. N.J.

Hill Homeowners Ass'n v. Passaic Zon. Bd. of Adj.

129 N.J. Super. 170 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 1974

Kramer v. … board power by the Appellate Division in Saddle River Country Day School v.

Alexander Cardillo v. Board of Education of the City of Paterson, Etc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 2026

We previously decided an appeal arising from Cardillo's Law Division complaint filed against the Board and other defendants. Cardillo v. State Operated Sch. Dist. for City of Paterson (Cardillo I), No. … Super. at 242, any Board employee action to the contrary would be void as ultra vires. Meyers v.

State v. Williams

194 N.J. Super. 590 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1984

Brown, supra, 185 N.J.Super. at 493 .] Also in regard to the predecessor statute, the court in State v. … Brown, supra, 185 N.J.Super. at 493 .] In State v.

Luciano v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.

306 N.J. Super. 310 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1997

The judge also endeavored to distinguish the instant facts from those in Brown v. Racquet Club of Brick- *313 town, 95 N.J. 280 , 471 A.2d 25 (1984); Rose v. … , similar to the collapse of the stairway involved in Brown v.

Robinson v. KREISCHER

97 N.J. Super. 104 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 1967

In Board of Health of Weehawken Twp. v. N.Y. … In Jacoby v. Brown, 55 N.J.

Village of Pine Run v. South Jersey Gas Co.

215 N.J. Super. 54 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1987

Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430 US. 519, 525, 97 S.Ct. 1305, 1308 , 51 L.Ed.2d 604, 614 (1977). We find no such explicit or implicit expression. … See Crema v. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection, 94 N.J. 286, 299 (1983). Affirmed. Numbers represent individual findings set out in ALJ’s opinion.

New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. State

162 N.J. Super. 60 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 21, 1978

Super. 60 (1978) 392 A.2d 216 NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENTS. … Deptford Tp. v.

In Re Tenure Hearing of Grossman

127 N.J. Super. 13 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 1974

Wildwood v. State Board of Education, 116 N.J.L. 572 (Sup. … Redcay v. State Board of Education, 130 N.J.L. 369, 370 (Sup. Ct. 1943).

Garrison v. Garrison

15 N.J. Eq. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1858

Le Breton v. Fletcher, 2 Hagg. 568; Lowe v. Jolliffe, 1 Sir Wm. Bl. 365; Shelford on Lunacy 54, 55. … (H all v. Warren, 9 Ves. jun. 610.)

Gandolfi v. Town of Hammonton

367 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 2004

First, citing Orloski v. … Board of Adjustment, Sea Girt, 80 N.J.Super. 454 , 194 A. 2d 26 (Law Div.1963) and Morton v.

Fay v. MEDFORD TP. COUNCIL

423 N.J. Super. 81 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 2011

Super. 81 Victoria FAY, Plaintiff, v. MEDFORD TOWNSHIP COUNCIL, Medford Township, Stephen Addezio, Christopher Myers, David Brown, Robert Martin, Mark Sander, Defendants. Docket No. … Thus, while a court is to "give substantial deference to findings of fact, it is essential that the board's actions be grounded in evidence in the record." Fallone Prop., L.L.C. v. Bethlehem Twp.

Wolf v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. of Park Ridge

79 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 1963

For reasons which have been explained too many times in the past to require restatement now, the action of the board is fatally defective and must be set aside. See Tomko v. Vissers, 21 N.J. 226 (1956); Dolan v. … Lamb v. A.D. McKee, Inc., 10 N.J. Misc. 649 ( Sup. Ct. 1932)." The case will therefore be remanded to the board of adjustment.

Ehimwenma Adeyin v. Board of Education of the City of Orange, Etc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 2025

the 1 Under N.J.S.A. 10:4-12 and Rice v. … See Campbell v. N.J.

Capodilupo v. W. Orange Tp. Ed. Bd.

218 N.J. Super. 510 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 1987

Spiewak v. Rutherford Bd. of Ed., supra, 90 N.J. at 74 . The Board's reliance upon Lichtman v. Ridgewood Bd. of Ed., supra, 93 N.J. at 364 to support its contention that tenure has no relevance in a RIF is misplaced. … We further reject the contention that the State Board was "rulemaking," in violation of the standards of Metromedia, Inc. v.

Carlia M. Brady v. Board of Trustees of the Judicial Retirement System

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 12, 2025

See O'Connell v. … As part of the analysis, the Board applied the Supreme Court's rationale in Patterson v.

In Re Plainfield-Union Water Co.

57 N.J. Super. 158 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 1, 1959

Co. of New Jersey v. Dept. of Public Utilities, supra, 7 N.J. at pages 261-262; New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. … Since the decision of the Board in the instant case the Supreme Court has decided State v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., supra, 30 N.J. 16 (decided June 1, 1959).