Case law

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Pioneer State Bank

155 N.J. Super. 381 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 29, 1977

In *393 Lullo v. … In his opinion Judge Brown stated: The agreements referred to in the complaint in the instant case were evidently fairly and honestly made for a purpose that was clearly within the corporate powers of the group.

Village of Pine Run v. South Jersey Gas Co.

215 N.J. Super. 54 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1987

Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430 US. 519, 525, 97 S.Ct. 1305, 1308 , 51 L.Ed.2d 604, 614 (1977). We find no such explicit or implicit expression. … See Crema v. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection, 94 N.J. 286, 299 (1983). Affirmed. Numbers represent individual findings set out in ALJ’s opinion.

Holmes v. American Society, C., Animals

123 N.J. Eq. 127 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1938

Board of Domestic Missions of the Reformed Church in America, 59 N.J. … Also see Brown v. Condit, 70 N.J. Eq. 440 ; Kinnear v. Ballagh, 109 N.J. Eq. 27 ; Morristown Trust Co. v. Morristown, 82 N.J. Eq. 521 ; Smith v. Smith, 54 N.J. Eq. 1 ; Norcross' Adm'rs v. Murphy's Ex'rs, supra.

In Re Edmonston

123 N.J. Eq. 34 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1938

Borden v. Wolf Silk Co., 108 N.J. Eq. 438 ; In re Foran, 85 N.J. Eq. 288 ; Pritchard v. Howell, 87 N.J. Eq. 252 . … Eq. 327 ; First Mechanics National Bank v. Martin, 119 N.J. Eq. 280 .

T.W. v. A.W.

224 N.J. Super. 675 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 1988

The judge’s decision was based on a finding that the May 12, 1976 order dismissing defendant’s claims was res judicata, see Charlie Brown of Chatham v. … Board of Adjustment, 202 N.J.Super. 312, 327 (App.Div.1985), and that defendant’s subsequent conduct caused his application to be barred by laches, see Moore v. Hafeeza, supra, 212 N.J.Super. at 406 .

Dorothy Guo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Township of Millburn

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2026

"[W]hen a party challenges a zoning board's decision through an action in lieu of prerogative writs, the zoning board's decision is entitled to deference." Kane Props., LLC v. … "[T]he burden is on the challenging party to show that the zoning board's decision was 'arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.'" Price v. Himeji, LLC, 214 N.J. 263, 284 (2013) (quoting Kramer v.

Hare v. NEW JERSEY PAROLE BD.

368 N.J. Super. 175 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 2004

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Bd., 166 N.J. 113, 172 , 764 A. 2d 940 (2001), modified, 167 N.J. 619 , 772 A. 2d *687 926 (2001); New Jersey State Parole Bd. v. … Moreover, "Parole Board decisions are highly individualized discretionary appraisals," Trantino, supra, 166 N.J. at 173 , 764 A. 2d 940 (citing Beckworth v.

Papalexiou v. Tower West Condominium

167 N.J. Super. 516 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 15, 1979

The power of a board of directors of a condominium association has been judicially considered in other jurisdictions. Century 21 Commodore Plaza, Inc. v. … As in Hidden Harbour Estates v. Norman, supra, 309 So. 2d at 182 , the court cautioned that rules passed by the board must be related to the "health, happiness and enjoyment of life of the various unit owners." Ryan v.

Kenwood Assocs. v. Bd. of Adj. Englewood

141 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1976

He cannot substitute his own judgment for that of the municipal board invested with the power and duty to pass upon the application. Stolz v. Ellenstein, 7 N.J. 291 (1951); Peoples Trust Co., etc. v. … The action of the board is presumed to be valid. Rexon v. Haddonfield Bd. of Adj., 10 N.J. 1, 7 (1952); Bove v. Emerson Bd. of Adj., 100 N.J. Super. 95, 101 (App. Div. 1968).

In re Middlesex Reg'l Educ. Servs. Comm'n Name Change Request

453 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 2018

Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v. … Co. v. N.J.

Garden State Outdoor, LLC v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Middle Township

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 2026

It may be adopted by a municipal planning board only after a public hearing, [(citing)] N.J.S.A. 40:55D-28." Nigro v. Plan. … "Zoning boards may choose which witnesses, including expert witnesses, to believe." Bd. of Educ. of Clifton v.

Nicholas Cilento v. Board of Education of the Township of Woodbridge, Etc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 2026

A-2151-22 NICHOLAS CILENTO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … DiNapoli v. Bd. of Educ. of Twp. of Verona, 434 N.J. Super. 233, 235-36 (App. Div. 2014) (quoting J.D. v. N.J. Div. of Developmental Disabilities, 329 N.J. Super. 516, 521 (App.

Inganamort v. Bor. of Fort Lee

120 N.J. Super. 286 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1972

McDonald v. Board of Election Com'rs of Chicago, 394 U.S. 802, 809 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969); United States v. … Javins relied upon Brown v. Southall Realty Co., 237 A. 2d 834 (D.C.

In re NJDEP ex rel. Christ Church

414 N.J. Super. 592 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 2010

The Church also submitted an application for site-plan approval to the Rockaway Planning Board (the Planning Board). … R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999) (quoting Smith v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 108 N.J 19, 25, 527 A.2d 843 (1987)).

Collins v. Yancey

55 N.J. Super. 514 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1959

Morris Brown argued the cause for the plaintiff ( Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys). Mr. Augustus S. … Giles v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 22 (1956).

State v. Lopez

160 N.J. Super. 30 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 5, 1978

Id.; see Brown v. Ohio, 432 U. S. 161, 168 , 97 S. Ct. 2221, 2226 , 53 L. Ed. 2d 187, 196 (1977); State v. Lobato, 7 N. J. 137, 145-146 (1951); cf. Jeffers v. United States, 432 U. S. 137 , 97 S. Ct. 2207 , 53 L. … With regard to double jeopardy and the doctrine of lesser included offenses, see Brown v. Ohio, supra; State v. Labato, supra; State v. Zelichowski, supra, 52 N.

J.P. v. Division of Medical Assistance

392 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 2007

Therefore, the Board contended that the alimony must be paid to the nursing home. … Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 , 65 S.Ct. 161, 164 , 89 L.Ed. 124, 129 (1944). [.A.B. v.

In Re Rcn of Ny

375 N.J. Super. 12 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 2005

Id. at 381 , 802 A .2d at 504 (quoting R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A. 2d 1, 4 (1999)). Here, however, we are faced with interpreting a federal statute. … Greenwood v.

Hill Homeowners Ass'n v. Passaic Zon. Bd. of Adj.

129 N.J. Super. 170 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 1974

Kramer v. … board power by the Appellate Division in Saddle River Country Day School v.

City Consumer Services, Inc. v. Dept. of Banking

134 N.J. Super. 588 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1975

See Motyka v. McCorkle, supra ; Cole Nat. Corp. v. State Bd. of Examiners, 57 N.J. 227, 231 (1970); Schwerman Trucking v. Dept. of Env. Protection, 125 N.J. Super. 14, 20 (App. Div. 1973). … See Motyka v. McCorkle, 58 N.J. 165 (1971). See also, Brown v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1 (1972); General Motors Corp. v. Blair, 129 N.J. Super. 412 (App.