Case law

Saunders v. Capital Health System at Mercer

398 N.J. Super. 500 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 2008

"Licensee" means any person who holds a license from the Board to practice as a midwife. … In Knorr v.

Atlantic Pier Co., Inc. v. Borough of Bay Head Planning Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 2024

As such, "when a party challenges a . . . board's decision through an action in lieu of prerogative writs, the . . . board's decision is entitled to deference." Kane Props., LLC v. … 27 adding the residential unit—necessitating that the Board undertake the analysis mandated by Medici v.

Sczyrek v. County of Essex

324 N.J. Super. 235 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 10, 1999

In Rochinsky v. … In Lee v.

A.M. VS. MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 2021

In re Est. of Brown, 448 N.J. Super. 252, 256 (App. Div. 2017) (quoting Est. of DeMartino v. Div. of Med. Assistance & Health Servs., 373 N.J. Super. 210, 217 (App. Div. 2004)); see also 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396-1. … Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 301 (1980).

REGINA TASCA VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

458 N.J. Super. 47 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 2019

In Galvano v. Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System, 225 N.J. Super. 388, 390-92 (App. … In Sellers v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 399 N.J. Super. 51 (App. Div. 2008), the Board initially approved the appellant's enrollment in PFRS as a firefighter. Id. at 54.

Coffee Associates, LLC v. Borough of Edgewater Zoning Board of Adjustment

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 2024

See Zaman v. … See Hayes v.

Tappen v. Davidson

27 N.J. Eq. 459 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1876

Mundy v. Mundy, 2 McCarter 290; Allaire v. Allaire, 8 Vroom 312 ; Wright v. Rogers, 1 L. R. P. and D. 678. The question, therefore, is whether the negative proposition is proved. … Says the judge, (Lord Penzance,) in Wright v.

Sharrock v. Keansburg

15 N.J. Super. 11 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 9, 1951

Sample ballots were prepared and mailed to the qualified voters by the district boards of elections on October 31, 1950, and on November 1, 1950. … In harmony with the general rule are the decisions in Burrough v. Branning, 9 N.J.L.J. 110 ( Cir. Ct. 1886); Winters v. Warmolts, 70 N.J.L. 615 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); Brown v.

Greate Bay Hotel & Casino v. City of Atlantic

21 N.J. Tax 122 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 2003

Union City Associates v. City of Union City, 115 N.J. 17 , 556 A.2d 769 (1989). … If the converse is true and the taxpayer files with the county board and the municipality with the Tax Court, then, as Judge Rimm held in Atlantic City v.

D'Anastasio Corp. v. Township of Pilesgrove

387 N.J. Super. 241 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 14, 2006

Warren, P.P., the Board conducted a hearing on the petition on April 29, 2000. … Russell v. Stafford Twp., 261 N.J.Super. 43, 48 , 617 A.2d 685 (Law Div.1992).

CBS Outdoor v. Lebanon Plan. Bd.

414 N.J. Super. 563 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 2010

See also Burbridge v. Mine Hill Twp., 117 N.J. 376, 385 , 568 A. 2d 527 (1990) (stating that there must be "adequate evidence" in the record supporting the board's determination); Pullen v. S. … State v.

Field v. Field

31 N.J. Super. 139 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1954

See Epstein v. Ferst, 35 Fla. 498 , 17 So. 414 ; Brown v. Brown, 167 Tenn. 567, 82 [72] S.W. 2 d 557; Burton v. Burton, 58 Vt. 414 , 5 A. 281 ; Note (1944) 149 A.L.R. 553 , 564. … Stultz v. Stultz, 15 N.J. 315 , decided May 3, 1954, reversing 28 N.J. Super. 446 ( App. Div. 1953); Brown v. Brown, 28 N.J. Super. 165 ( App. Div. 1953); Hubschman v. Hubschman, supra; 31 Am.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Pioneer State Bank

155 N.J. Super. 381 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 29, 1977

In *393 Lullo v. … In his opinion Judge Brown stated: The agreements referred to in the complaint in the instant case were evidently fairly and honestly made for a purpose that was clearly within the corporate powers of the group.

Kenwood Assocs. v. Bd. of Adj. Englewood

141 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1976

He cannot substitute his own judgment for that of the municipal board invested with the power and duty to pass upon the application. Stolz v. Ellenstein, 7 N.J. 291 (1951); Peoples Trust Co., etc. v. … The action of the board is presumed to be valid. Rexon v. Haddonfield Bd. of Adj., 10 N.J. 1, 7 (1952); Bove v. Emerson Bd. of Adj., 100 N.J. Super. 95, 101 (App. Div. 1968).

State v. Brabham

413 N.J. Super. 196 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 30, 2010

United States v. Swint, 15 F. 3d 286, 290 (3d Cir. 1994); see also State v. … United States v.

Schwartz Nagle, Etc. v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders

6 N.J. Super. 79 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1949

The purchasing agent of Middlesex County, by order of the Board of Freeholders, advertised for tires and tubes. … The Board of Freeholders acted on the recommendation of their purchasing agent, — that while the Fisk is a good tire, it is not generally considered as serviceable as a Goodyear.

Roxana Gaviria v. Board of Education of the City of Elizabeth

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 19, 2024

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted April 23, 2024 – Decided July 19, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and … PER CURIAM  Plaintiff Roxana Gaviria appeals from the March 9, 2023, Law Division order dismissing with prejudice her complaint against her employer, defendant Elizabeth Board of Education (Board), pursuant to Rule

Dore v. Bedminster Tp. Bd. of Ed.

185 N.J. Super. 447 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 1982

Nevertheless, the decision unduly penalized the board herein because its statement of reasons was not supported by the evaluations. See Donaldson v. North Wildwood Bd. of Ed., 65 N.J. 236, 241 (1974); Winston v. … NOTES [1] Drown v. Portsmouth School Dist., 435 F. 2d 1182 (1 Cir.1970), cert. den. 402 U.S. 972 , 91 S.Ct. 1659 , 29 L.Ed. 2d 137 (1971); Monks v. N.J. State Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238 (1971).

Holmes v. American Society, C., Animals

123 N.J. Eq. 127 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1938

Board of Domestic Missions of the Reformed Church in America, 59 N.J. … Also see Brown v. Condit, 70 N.J. Eq. 440 ; Kinnear v. Ballagh, 109 N.J. Eq. 27 ; Morristown Trust Co. v. Morristown, 82 N.J. Eq. 521 ; Smith v. Smith, 54 N.J. Eq. 1 ; Norcross' Adm'rs v. Murphy's Ex'rs, supra.

Giordano v. the City Commission

2 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 15, 1949

Church v. Board of Adjustment, 14 N.J. Misc. 288 (Sup.Ct. 1936). … Brandon v. Montclair, 125 N.J.L. 367 (E. A. 1940 ); St. Mary's Etc. Church v. Board of Adjustment, above.