Case law

Stubaus v. Whitman

339 N.J. Super. 38 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 2001

A local school board is accorded only those rights provided by statute. See Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189, 199 , 180 A. 2d 136 (1962). … Similarly, this case is distinguishable from Board of Educ. of East Brunswick Tp. v. Township Council of East Brunswick Tp., 48 N.J. 94 , 223 A. 2d 481 (1966), which plaintiffs also rely on.

Township of Hanover v. Town of Morristown

108 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1969

Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board, 347 U.S. 590 , 74 S.Ct. 757 , 98 L.Ed. 967 (1954). Relying on Allegheny Airlines v. Village of Cedarhurst, supra , City of Newark v. Eastern Airlines, Inc. 159 F. … The United States Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, supra , recognized a court's power to issue experimental decrees when it directed that action be taken "with all deliberate speed."

Aiello v. Myzie

88 N.J. Super. 187 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 1965

Brown's affidavit presents no more than a claimed erroneous prognosis on his part. See Curry v. Thompson, 247 S.W. 2 d 792, 31 A.L.R. 2 d 1225 ( Mo. Sup. Ct. 1952). … See also Great American Indemnity Company v. Brown, 307 F. 2 d 306, 309 (5 Cir. 1962); Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Smith, 107 Ga. App. 384 , 130 S.E. 2 d 355 ( Ct. App. 1963).

Hallion v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

337 N.J. Super. 360 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 2001

Curtis v. Finneran, 83 N.J. 563, 569-70 , 417 A. 2d 15 (1980)(quoting Kenwood Assocs. v. Board of Adjustment of Englewood, 141 N.J.Super. 1, 4 , 357 A. 2d 55 (App.Div.1976)); see also CNA Insurance Companies v. … Brown v. Selective Insurance Co., 311 N.J.Super. 210 , 709 A. 2d 812 (App.Div. 1998). In Brown, the plaintiff was injured when he was struck by an uninsured vehicle in June 1989.

ATLANTIC AMBULANCE CORPORATION VS. JOHN G. CULLUM ATLANTIC AMBULANCE CORPORATION VS. HALA HITTI(L-264-12 AND L-2097-12, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)

451 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 2017

Brown, attorneys; Lauren E. Aguiar (Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, Mr. Brown and Peter A. Marra, on the brief). … See DiCarlo v. St.

A.B. v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services

374 N.J. Super. 460 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2005

Schweiker v. Gray Panthers, 453 U.S. 34, 43 , 101 S.Ct. 2633, 2640 , 69 L.Ed.2d 460, 469-70 (1981). … See Id.; Cleary v.

Samuelson v. Quinones

119 N.J. Super. 338 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1972

The Javins court relied upon Brown v. Southall Realty Co., 237 A. 2d 834 (D.C. … See also Amanuensis, Ltd. v. Brown, 65 Misc. 2d 15 , 318 N.Y.S. 2d 11 (Civ.

Saunders v. Capital Health System at Mercer

398 N.J. Super. 500 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 2008

"Licensee" means any person who holds a license from the Board to practice as a midwife. … In Knorr v.

State v. Knight

283 N.J. Super. 98 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1995

State v. … prison then Worthy had a great incentive to "get" Brown before Brown "got" him.

La Sala v. La Sala

335 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 3, 2000

See Cleveland v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen's Retirement System, 229 N.J.Super. 156 , 550 A. 2d 1287 (App.Div. 1988). … Moreover, pension benefits for police and fire fighters will be jeopardized in the future if the fund is not "`maintained upon a sound actuarial basis.'" 8 Brown v.

Quaremba v. Allan

128 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 1974

See Brown v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1, 10-11 (1972). … Board of Election Comm'rs of Chicago, 394 U.S. 802, 809 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969).

US Mineral Products Co. v. American Ins. Co.

348 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 2002

Co. v. … In Board of Trs. of Univ. of Ill. v.

Coffee Associates, LLC v. Borough of Edgewater Zoning Board of Adjustment

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 2024

See Zaman v. … See Hayes v.

State v. Zarrilli

216 N.J. Super. 231 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1987

This provision has been addressed in three reported New Jersey cases: (1) State v. Brown, 188 N.J. Super. 656 (Law Div. 1983). Brown, a State prisoner, was indicted for possession of 65/100 of a gram of cocaine. … Smith and Brown both cited State v. Park, 55 Hawaii 610 , 525 P. 2d 586 (Sup.Ct. 1974), which lists factors to be considered in addressing a de minimis motion.

Save Camden Pub. Sch. v. Camden City Bd. of Educ.

454 N.J. Super. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 2018

See Robinson v. … Adm'rs v.

Sharrock v. Keansburg

15 N.J. Super. 11 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 9, 1951

Sample ballots were prepared and mailed to the qualified voters by the district boards of elections on October 31, 1950, and on November 1, 1950. … In harmony with the general rule are the decisions in Burrough v. Branning, 9 N.J.L.J. 110 ( Cir. Ct. 1886); Winters v. Warmolts, 70 N.J.L. 615 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); Brown v.

Rocco v. NJ Transit Rail Operations

330 N.J. Super. 320 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 2000

While there are no reported decisions in New Jersey, the California Supreme Court in Brown v. … Brown, supra at 635-36.

Wright v. Plaza Ford

164 N.J. Super. 203 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 1978

Board of Health v. Weehawken Tp. v. New York Central R.R. Co., 10 N.J. 284, 291 (1952); Croasdale v. Court of Quarter Sessions, 88 N.J.L. 506 (Sup. … Ct. 1913); Brown v. Davidson, 59 Iowa 461 , 13 N.W. 442 (Sup. Ct. 1882).

State of New Jersey v. Yusef B. Allen

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 2025

Brown, 236 N.J. at 518. The Brady rule is invoked when information is discovered after trial "which had been known to the prosecution but unknown to the defense." United States v. … Brown, 236 N.J. at 518-19 (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 199-200 (1991)).

State v. Rajnai

132 N.J. Super. 530 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 1975

State v. Reyes, supra; State v. Brown, 67 N. J. Super. 450, 454-455 (App. Div. 1961). Possession need not be exclusive but may be jointly exercised by two or more persons. State v. Puckett, 67 N. J. … State v. Brown, 99 N. J. Super. 22, 27 (App. Div. 1968), certif. den. 51 N. J. 468 (1968) Clearly there was no abuse of discretion here.