Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.22s

  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BENNIE ANDERSON (L-0600-19, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 2020

    Austin, 509 U.S. at 607 (quoting Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 268 (1989)). … at 133-34; Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BENNIE ANDERSON (L-0600-19, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 2020

    Austin, 509 U.S. at 607 (quoting Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 268 (1989)). … Super at 133-34; Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Russell Forde Hornor v. Upper Freehold Regional Board of Education

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 8, 2024

    Davis v. … See Hoag v. Brown, 397 N.J. Super. 34, 54-55 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.

    1 N.J. Super. 532 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 22, 1948

    Pearce v. Buell, 22 Ore. 29 , 33 ; Wooster v. Cavendar, 54 Ark. 153 ; Piper v. Headlee, 39 Ill. App.? 93; Sledge v. Obenchain, 58 Miss. 670 , 675 ; Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 ; Walters v. … In Dieckman v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • EVERETT E. THOMAS, ETC. CO., INC. v. Kingsley

    85 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1964

    State Board of Assessors v. Central R.R. Co., 48 N.J.L. 146, 279 ( E. & A. 1886); Stratton v. Collins, 43 N.J.L. 562, 564 ( Sup. Ct. 1881). … See Jersey City v. Ligget & Myers Tobacco Co., 14 N.J. 112 (1953); Schwartz v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 129 N.J.L. 129 ( Sup. Ct. 1942), affirmed 130 N.J.L. 177 ( E. & A. 1943).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Bunyan

    299 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1997

    State v. Carter, 85 N.J. 300, 314 , 426 A.2d 501 (1981); State v. Robinson, 253 N.J.Super. 346, 365-367 , 601 A.2d 1162 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 130 N.J. 6 , 611 A.2d 646 (1992); State v. … See, e.g., State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Essex County

    223 N.J. Super. 239 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 30, 1987

    In Armstrong v. … Kolitch v. Lindedahl, 100 N.J. 485, 492 (1985); see also Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 575 (1981) and Polyard v. Terry, 160 N.J.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lickfield v. Lickfield

    260 N.J. Super. 21 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 21, 1992

    The effect of the doctrine is to preclude a party from withholding from the action for separate and later litigation a constituent component of the controversy. .... [ Brown v. Brown, 208 N.J. … In making that argument defendant relies on J.Z.M. v. S.M.M., 226 N.J. Super. *25 642, 646, 545 A. 2d 249 (Law Div. 1988) and Brown v. Brown, supra . Both are distinguishable.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Minardi v. Pacific Airmotive Corp.

    43 N.J. Super. 460 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1957

    See Hines v. Norwalk Lock Co., supra , In re Brown, supra . The statute in its present form ( N.J.S.A. 34:15-12( x ) [*] ) is an amendment which became effective January 1, 1951. … Ranney v. Instituto Pontificio Delle Maestre Filippini, 20 N.J. 189 (1955); Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of Town of Montclair, 124 N.J.L. 135, 143 ( Sup. Ct. 1940); affirmed 125 N.J.L. 367 ( E. & A. 1940).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Velasco v. Goldman Builders, Inc.

    93 N.J. Super. 123 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 13, 1966

    Pleasant Manor Building Co. v. Brown, supra, 42 N.J. Super., at p. 303 . But see Atlantic City v. … Pleasant Manor Building Co. v. Brown, supra, 42 N.J. Super., at p. 304 . Cf. Biglin v. Town of West Orange, 46 N.J. 367, 374 (1966).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Young v. Hobart West Group

    385 N.J. Super. 448 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 2005

    The minutes from the April 10, 2001, Board of Director's meeting state: The Board reviewed the Key Items Report for the staffing business. The Board identified disappointing sales for Q4 2000 and Q1 2001. … Romano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 284 N.J.Super. 543, 549 , 665 A. 2d 1139 (App.Div.1995).

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • Owens v. Kessler

    272 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1994

    Dabal v. Sodora, supra, 260 N.J. Super. at 401 , 616 A. 2d 1297 ; see also Brown v. Puente, 257 N.J. Super. 203 , 608 A. 2d 377 (App.Div. 1992). We initially consider plaintiff's proof of objective injury. … Additionally, in Brown v. Puente, supra, 257 N.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Convery v. MacZka

    163 N.J. Super. 411 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1978

    State Board, etc., 98 N.J.L. 690, 694 (Sup. Ct. 1923), aff'd 99 N.J.L. 516 (E. & A. 1924)) and to exercise broad authority and discretion in his raising ( Pierce v. … Titus v. Lindberg, 49 N.J. 66 (1967) (liability of school principal); Brown v. Knight, 362 Mass. 350 , 285 N.E. 2d 790 (Sup. Jud. Ct. 1972) (liability of summer school proprietor); Broome v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sate ex rel. K. V. N.

    116 N.J. Super. 580 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 1971

    Levy. v. Louisiana, supra; Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U. S. 663, 669-670 , 86 S. Ct. 1079, 1082-1083 , 16 L. Ed. 2d 169, 174 (1966); Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson, 316 U. S. 535, 541 , 62 S. … Brown v. Bd. of Ed., 347 U. S. 483 , 74 S. Ct. 686 , 98 L. Ed. 873 (1954); Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, supra, 383 U. S. at 669, 86 S. Ct. 1079 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hef Ventures, LLC v. Township of Hanover Zoning Board of Adjustment

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 28, 2026

    Cleary Giacobbe Alfieri Jacobs, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Marina V. Brown, of counsel and on the briefs). … The Board considered Borough of Glassboro v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Fitzgerald v. Stables

    370 N.J. Super. 582 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 2004

    (Compensation Board) established pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-129, et *584 seq. … Only those individuals that meet this definition come within the ambit of coverage by the Compensation Board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Behrman v. Egan

    25 N.J. Super. 109 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 1953

    Duffy, attorney for defendants Browne and Fuld. Messrs. Herman H. Singer and Albert S. Gross, attorneys for estates of James H. O'Dea, et als. Messrs. … Ct. 1945); Braman v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 138 N.J. Eq. 165 ( Ch. 1946); Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co., supra . Also cf. R.S. 3:16-12 N.J.S.A. " And, in Conover v. Guarantee Trust Co., 88 N.J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • D'Anastasio Corp. v. Township of Pilesgrove

    387 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2005

    (citing Booth v. Board of Adj. of Rockaway Twp., 50 N.J. 302, 306 , 234 A.2d 681 (1967)), certif. denied, 182 N.J. 143 , 861 A.2d 847 (2004). There is a presumption of validity accorded to municipal actions. Russell v. … In Ryan v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • R.J.P. Builders, Inc. v. Township of Woolwich

    361 N.J. Super. 207 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 2003

    On March 15, 2001, defendant Woolwich Township Planning Board (Board) granted final major subdivision approval to plaintiff R.J.P. Builders, Inc. (Builders) for a development project called “The Links.” … The planning board may extend the 95-day or 190-day period if the developer proves to the reasonable satisfaction of the planning board (1) that the developer was barred or prevented, directly or indirectly, from filing because

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. City of Atlantic City

    309 N.J. Super. 596 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 1998

    The Planning Board noted that the Board’s Division of Planning and a subcommittee of that Board had prepared such a plan, and the Planning Board recommended the adoption of the *606 Huron North Redevelopment Plan to the City … Charlie Brown of Chatham v. Board of Adjustment of Chatham, 202 N.J.Super. 312, 321 , 495 A.2d 119 (App.Div.1985); Drake v. Human Servs.

    Cited 65 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.