Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,737 results
0.82s
553 F. Supp. 2d 377 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 18, 2008
The Government further urges this Court to examine a recent memorandum opinion by Chief Judge Brown. In United States v. … Montgomery, Chief Judge Brown explained that where an expert will merely testify as to the psychological motives for doing unlawful acts, the evidence is barred under Pohlot. United States v. Montgomery, Crim.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBradshaw v. Township of Middletown
296 F. Supp. 2d 526 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 4, 2003
Brown v. Pa. Dep’t of Health Emergency Med. Sens. Training Inst., 318 F.3d 473 , 477 (3d Cir.2003). … Brown, 269 F.3d at 216 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited States v. Caribbean Ventures, Ltd.
387 F. Supp. 1256 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 20, 1974
Penn Galvanizing Co. v. Lukens Steel Co., 468 F.2d 1021, 1023 (3d Cir. 1972); Winkleman v. New York Stock Exchange, 445 F.2d 786, 789 (3d Cir. 1971); A. L. K. Corp. v. … Investment Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 308 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1962). Defendants, as well as the government, rely on Hacienda.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE UAW GROUP HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. ACOSTA
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 6, 2022
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)) (internal quotations omitted). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknown888 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 8, 1995
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Plaintiff points out that in the case of Harrington v. Board of Education of the Township of Clinton, OAL Docket No.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States v. General Electronics, Inc.
556 F. Supp. 801 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 18, 1983
Bollinger v. Wagner Min. Equipment Co., 667 F.2d 402 (3d Cir.1981). … The Court, however, remanded the case to the Board for the taking of additional evidence. Fairfield Scientific Corp. v. U.S., 611 F.2d 854 , 222 Ct.Cl. 167 (1979).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 11, 2024
See, e.g., Tingey v. Gardner, 827 F. … See, e.g., Ingram v. Schwab, No. CV 22-1665, 2024 WL 4647630, at *3 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2024); see also Brown v. Williams, 644 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown19 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 14, 1936
Central Railroad Company v. State Tax Department, 112 N.J.Law, 5 , 169 A. 489 . The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Hill v. … Dorrance v. Thayer-Martin, 176 A. 902 , 13 Misc. 168 .
Cited 3 timesPublished39 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 22, 1941
McCarthy v. Palmer, 2 Cir., 113 F.2d 721, 723 . … Nor will any benefits be paid to him in the future so far as the proofs in this case are concerned, unless the Railroad Retirement Board grants him relief. 45 U.S.C.A. § 55 ; McCarthy v. Palmer, supra.
Cited 20 timesPublishedBOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE UAW GROUP HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. ACOSTA
District Court, D. New Jersey · May 26, 2021
Max’s Seafood Café v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999). … U.S. v. Compaction Sys. Corp., 88 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownM.I. v. NORTH HUNTERDON-VOORHEES REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 30, 2021
(ECF No. 12) and Defendant North Hunterdon-Voorhees Regional High School Board of Education (“Defendant”) (ECF No. 13). … Dist. v. T.A., 557 U.S. 230, 232 (2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDia Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Reno
831 F. Supp. 360 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 11, 1993
v. … Stowaways usually are detained on board the carrying vessel. Medina v. O'Neill, 838 F.2d 800, 801 (5th Cir.1988) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1323 (d)). 12 .
Reversed on other grounds by Dia Navigation Co. v. Pomeroy, 34 F.3d 1255 (1994)Cited 5 timesPublishedHILSENRATH v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CHATHAMS
District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 12, 2020
Wood, 915 F.3d at 317; see also Torlakson, 973 F.3d at 1021; Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified Sch. Dist., 27 F.3d 1373, 1380 (9th Cir. 1994). … E.g., Wood, 915 F.3d at 317; Brown, 27 F.3d at 1380; Doe, 653 F.3d at 284. For example, in Malnak v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc.
863 F. Supp. 2d 394 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 30, 2012
Corp. v. … (emphasis added); see also Brown Instrument Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished834 F. Supp. 2d 209 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 5, 2011
Goldenberg v. Indel, Inc., 741 F.Supp.2d 618, 624 (D.N.J.2010). On June 21, 1999, Plaintiff entered into a loan agreement with Sovereign Bank, who subsequently assigned the loan to Brown Bark I LP (“Brown Bark”). … Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s collection efforts and communication, on behalf of Brown Bark, were harassing in nature.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDeley v. Atlantic Box & Lumber Corp.
119 F. Supp. 727 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 15, 1954
Nor are the cases of MacDonald v. Martinelli, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 950, 120 F.Supp. 383 ; Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co., 2 Cir., 1952, 189 F.2d 871 , and Burrell v. La Follette Coach Lines, D.C.E.D.Tenn.N. … And in Brown, the Court’s viewpoint of the aim of the Portal-to-Portal Act is exactly as above stated.
Cited 11 timesPublishedAnsell Inc. v. Schmid Laboratories, Inc.
757 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 27, 1991
United States v. Calmar, 612 F.Supp. 1298, 1301 (D.N.J.1985) (citing Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); SmithKline Corp. v. … V.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFirst Atlantic Leasing Corp. v. Tracey
738 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 1, 1990
America v. … See Fine v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedAssisted Living Associates of Moorestown, L.L.C. v. Moorestown Township
31 F. Supp. 2d 389 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 29, 1998
Apr.3, 1989); accord Capitol Bus Co. v. … See Brescher v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 29, 2026
of Education (“Board” or “District”) and Tony Trongone (“Trongone”) (collectively, “Defendants”). … The Board submitted a position statement to the EEOC responding to Plaintiff’s allegations on May 6, 2022. [Id. ¶ 91.]
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna