Case law

Wilson v. American Ice Co.

206 F. 736 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 11, 1913

Story’s Equity Pleading, § 241; Shipman’s Equity Pleading, p. 320; Hageman v. Brown, 76 N. J. Eq. 126, 73 Atl: 862; Schuler v. So. Iron & Steel Co., 77 N. J. Eq. 60, 75 Atl. 552 . … R. v. Nickals, supra; Gibbons v. Mahon, supra; Trimble v. Amer. Sugar Ref. Co., 61 N. J. Eq. 340, 48 Atl. 912 . In Gibbons v.

RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title Insurance

981 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 20, 1997

Harris, Case Comment, Brown v. Nichols: The Eleventh Circuit Refuses to Play the Erie Game with Georgia’s Expert Affidavit Requirement, 29 Ga. L.Rev. 291 (1994). … The boards listed in N.J.S.A. § 45:1-15, however, did not include the State Board of Bar Examiners. 15 .

United States v. Renton

52 F. Supp. 961 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 19, 1943

Weinhandler v. United States, 2 Cir., 20 F.2d 359 ; United States v. Allen, D.C., 150 F. 152 ; Moore v. United States, 160 U.S. 268 , 16 S.Ct. 294 , 40 L.Ed. 422 . … This question is fully discussed and authorities cited in the case of Jolly v.

Mozier v. BD. OF ED. OF TP. OF CHERRY HILL, ETC.

450 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 19, 1977

Hochman v. Board of Education, 1977 S.L.D. ___ (January 6, 1977); Ramo v. Board of Education, 1972 S.L.D. 469; Branin v. Board of Education, 1967 S.L.D. 9; Amorosa v. … E. g., Dunellen Board of Education v.

M.I. v. NORTH HUNTERDON-VOORHEES REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 9, 2022

See, e.g., D.E.R. v. Board of Educ. of the Borough of Ramsey, No. 04-2274, 2005 WL 1177944, at *18 (D.N.J. … Dist. v.

Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines

145 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 19, 1956

The record of the Board presented here for consideration on this motion discloses that the award was against the petitioner herein. In the matter of Moore v. Illinois Central R. … In reviewing the method of operation by the National Railroad Adjustment Board, Judge Goodrich, speaking for this Circuit said, in Kirby v. Pennsylvania R.

In Re Joseph Feld & Co.

38 F. Supp. 506 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 17, 1941

The board of directors was composed of three members, two of whom, Morris E. Feld and Charles H. … The power to manage the affairs of the corporation is vested in a board of directors; it is not conferred upon the members as individuals, and cannot be so exercised. Moffatt et al. v.

Hoeber v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98

964 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 23, 1997

Id. at 124 ; see Hirsch v. Building & Constr. … See NLRB v. Denver Building Council, 341 U.S. 675, 682 , 71 S.Ct. 943, 948 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 (1951). As the Ninth Circuit explained in NLRB v. Northern Cal. Dist.

Reid v. Barrett

467 F. Supp. 124 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1979

Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 150 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). The Board is a “person” subject to suit, Monell v. … Board of Trustees of Edgefield County School Dist., 521 F.2d 1201 , 1205 (4th Cir. 1975) and the Superintendent, Akron Board of Education v.

The Treasurer, Inc. v. Philadelphia Nat. Bank

682 F. Supp. 269 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 11, 1988

Citing Brown Shoe Co. v. … Chicago Board of Trade v.

Bagdan v. Beck

140 F.R.D. 660 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 19, 1991

In Redd v. … In Jackson v. J.C.

A.S. individually and o/b/o E.S. v. PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 28, 2022

For instance, in Carter v. … Paul T. v. Delaware Cty.

Laven v. Flanagan

695 F. Supp. 800 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 30, 1988

Recently, in Pinter v. … Harrison v. Enventure Capital Group, Inc., 666 F.Supp. 473, 476 (W.D.N.Y.1987); Frymire v. Peat, Marwick Mitchell & Co., 657 F.Supp. 889, 892 (N.D.Ill, 1987); Hokama v. E.F.

New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection v. Goddard (In Re Goddard)

212 B.R. 233 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 7, 1997

MEMORANDUM OPINION BROWN, District Judge. … United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). A bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law are subject to plenary review. Brown v.

Atlantic Coast Demo. and Recycling, Inc. v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic Cty.

988 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 18, 1997

Atlantic Coast Demolition & Recycling v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic County, 931 F.Supp. 341 (D.N.J.1996). … See Ryder v.

Clements v. HOUSING AUTH. OF BOROUGH OF PRINCETON

532 F. Supp. 2d 700 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 12, 2007

Thus, the Court finds that this fourth factor favors not classifying the Board Members as employees. v. … Co. v.

Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC

77 F. Supp. 2d 559 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 30, 1999

In Verkouteren v. Blackrock Fin. … The court concluded that plaintiffs bare allegation that the directors served on multiple boards for substantial compensation was insufficient to plead domination. Verkouteren , at 260-61. In Migdal v.

Essex County State Bank v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

331 F. Supp. 931 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 23, 1971

American Surety Co. v. Pauly, 170 U.S. 133, 144 , 18 S.Ct. 552 , 42 L.Ed. 977 (1898); Imperial Ins., Inc. v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd., 442 F.2d 1197 (D.C.Cir. 1970); Hunt v. … See also Imperial Ins., Inc. v.

United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 47 Bottles

26 F.R.D. 4 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 15, 1960

Brown v. United States, supra, arose out of a de-naturalization proceeding. … See Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 . If, as was not the fact in Brown v.

Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Lee

362 F. Supp. 581 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 7, 1973

The fact is that until plaintiffs apply to the Rent Leveling Board for increases above the February, 1972 rents and are rebuffed, any claim of damage is purely speculative. See Druker v. … McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963), cited by plaintiffs to excuse them *592 from submitting their case to the Board, is inapposite.