Case law

RAVIKOVICH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 4, 2025

However, the ALJ need include only “credibly established” limitations. Rutherford v. … where, inter alia, the claimant did not cast “doubt on medical records showing that when she participated in “active psychotherapy,” she was “relatively stable” and that “[u]nlike in Morales, there is no medical evidence clearly

ARRIOLA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 13, 2025

Standard Governing Benefits To qualify for DIB, a claimant must show that she is disabled within the meaning of the Act. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1)(E). … In fact, as detailed below, the ALJ’s detailed RFC analysis clearly referenced tasks relevant to the “light work” analysis.

DEMARCO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 10, 2022

The Act establishes a five-step sequential process for evaluation by the ALJ to determine whether an individual is disabled. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520. … The ALJ must also clearly set forth the reasons for her decision. Burnett v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 220 F.3d 112, 119 (3d Cir. 2000).

VERDU v. THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 2020

Because I find that Plaintiff has clearly not satisfied the first and third element of his retaliation claim, I need not address whether the particular circumstances of his administrative leave rose to the level of a material … Under this framework, a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination by alleging the following: “(1) s/he is a member of a protected class; (2) s/he was qualified for the position s/he sought

AYER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 5, 2026

P., 601 U.S. 257, 263 (2024) (“Half-truths . . . are ‘representations that state the truth only so far as it goes, while omitting critical qualifying information.’” (quoting Universal Health Servs., Ine. v. … “Maryland courts have clearly established the proposition that directors and officers owe fiduciary duties to both the corporation aud the shareholders.” Strougo v.

THIEFFRY v. WALDIS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 30, 2021

See Kamen, 500 U.S. at 96 (“the function of the demand doctrine in delimiting the respective powers of the individual shareholder and of the directors to control corporate litigation clearly is a matter of “substance,” … The Delaware Chancery Court has explained that: The fact that directors qualify as independent under the NYSE rules does not mean that they are necessarily independent under our law in particular

FLYNN-MURPHY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 31, 2025

The one time entry from May 15, 2021 coded “trial preparation” was clearly miscoded. … The time spent revising the brief was clearly relevant to ongoing motion practice and reasonable.

Hannah v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 29, 2020

However, with respect to these cases, the Court clearly lacks subject matter jurisdiction. … Second, PTI Royston has been fraudulently joined because it is immune from liability under Missouri’s contract specifications defense. (Johnson & Johnson Defs.’

Reising v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 29, 2020

However, with respect to these cases, the Court clearly lacks subject matter jurisdiction. … Second, PTI Royston has been fraudulently joined because it is immune from liability under Missouri’s contract specifications defense. (Johnson & Johnson Defs.’

Kassimali v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 29, 2020

However, with respect to these cases, the Court clearly lacks subject matter jurisdiction. … Second, PTI Royston has been fraudulently joined because it is immune from liability under Missouri’s contract specifications defense. (Johnson & Johnson Defs.’

DOE v. VINELAND CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 17, 2024

districts must satisfy their Child Find obligations; however, the Third Circuit has advised that “school districts must identify and evaluate students suspected of having a qualifying … , and include an index providing with particularity (a) the nature of the materials or proceeding at issue, (b) the private or public interests warranting the relief sought, (c) the clearly

<font color="red">DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE</font> - TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-cv-21607

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 28, 2021

Second, third- 5 The procedure for setting reimbursement rates for the Medicare program is well established. … The Assignors clearly fall into this definition.

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. v. POMERANTZ

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 11, 2022

GEICO also alleges that the treatments did not qualify for PIP reimbursement for other reasons, including that Pomerantz was an independent contractor not an employee (id. ¶ 129), and that Stelton Radiology, Rapid Imaging … Because the FAA does not compel arbitration, I must follow the precedents which state clearly that NJIFPA claims cannot be arbitrated.

RIVERA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 4, 2021

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff, born on August 1, 1962, was 54 years old on December 31, 2016, her date last insured, qualifying her as an individual closely approaching … The Act establishes a five-step sequential process for evaluation by the ALJ to determine whether an individual is disabled. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520.

ARTISTIC TILE, INC. v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 5, 2025

Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 727 A.2d 335, 343 (Me. 1999) in the context of determining whether a party qualified as a holder in due course under the UCC: The factfinder … Example Cases 5, 6, and 7 to Comment 4 of UCC § 3-405, describing the type of conduct that could amount to a failure to exercise ordinary care, clearly support the viability of Plaintiff’s comparative negligence claim

MACDONALD v. CASHCALL, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2019

“A ‘fail-safe’ class is ‘one that is defined so that whether a person qualifies as a member depends on whether the person has a valid claim.’” Grubb v. … Div. 2013) (charging rent above limits of local rent control ordinance qualifies as unconscionable commercial practice under CFA).

GUILLEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 30, 2024

And clearly Dr. Obuz has that over the snapshot from three years earlier that the DDS reviewers take. … 38 Plaintiff goes on to challenge the ALJ’s consideration of Plaintiff’s activities, arguing that the ALJ failed to consider Plaintiff’s “many qualifying

FIELDS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 14, 2022

unmarried; and (5) You are under age 18; you are 18 years old or older and have a disability that began before you became 22 years old; or you are 18 years or older and qualify … The DOT and other relevant sources clearly contemplate that some jobs require some tasks to be performed on a less-than-continuous basis, and there is no error in finding a claimant capable of an activity on an ‘occasional

GOODCHILD v. ORTIZ

District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 1, 2021

Winans never submitted a qualifying administrative remedy request seeking transfer to home confinement. (Reiser Decl. ¶ 19, Dkt. No. 8-2; Dobovich Decl. ¶ 6, Ex. 4, Dkt. No. 8 at 21-23.) … “A claim may be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1) only if it ‘clearly appears to be immaterial and made solely for the purpose of obtaining jurisdiction’” Id.

LAUFENBERG v. NAUGHTON

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 19, 2019

Article III prescribed that a qualifying employee “shall be eligible to retire on a [Base Pension] commencing on the first day of the month following his last Hour of Service” provided that: … “Judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) will not be granted ‘unless the movant clearly establishes that no material issue of fact remains to be resolved and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’”