Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,333 results
0.42s
TUCKER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 23, 2020
A diagnosis of impairment, by itself, does not establish entitlement to benefits under the Act”). … App’x 88, 90 (3d Cir. 2008) (“Thus, an ALJ need not specifically mention any of the listed impairments in order to make a judicially reviewable finding, provided that the ALJ’s decision clearly analyzes and evaluates the
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 12, 2021
Berardi clearly relied upon the prototype and Ragner’s oral suggestions about alternative methods for building an expandable hose in building his own. … Ragner Technologies attempted to establish an ongoing business relationship with Ed Kelly and Michael Berardi.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCOVINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 28, 2021
A diagnosis of impairment, by itself, does not establish entitlement to benefits under the Act”). … Karlin, Corey, and Pedowitz, which clearly support a finding of inability to perform light work (Supra.).” Plaintiff’s Brief, ECF No. 13, p. 27.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.
836 F. Supp. 1049 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 18, 1994
Merely establishing that disposals of certain substances are solely attributable to Grace or Hateo does not establish which releases, threatened releases or response costs are attributable to those disposals. … Grace has not established any of these defenses. 70. To qualify as a contribution plaintiff, Hateo must demonstrate that it has cleaned up and removed a discharge of a hazardous substance. 71.
Modified by Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn., 849 F. Supp. 987 (1994)Cited 21 timesPublishedModern Orthopaedics of NJ v. Premera Blue Cross
District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 3, 2025
The qualifying payment amounts for comparable items or services in the same region, in the same year; 2. … These instances of mandatory language are persuasive, as they clearly impose an obligation on Premera to pay the outstanding amount to Modern Ortho. Premera’s response is less than compelling.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Standard Oil Company (New Jersey)
253 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 28, 1966
I might qualify that by saying that at one period the prices were carried forward from one year to the next year, so that is one of the three years in which there were no revisions. Q. … They must also reckon with efficiency in cost production of the well established potash producers.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 6, 2025
At Petitioner’s December 6, 2018 Faretta hearing before Judge Martini, Petitioner clearly asserted his desire to represent himself. (See ECF No. 11-1 at 20–21.) … As a forfeiture or restitution order does not qualify as “custody,” and because § 2255 is available only to those seeking release from custody, relief under the statute is not available to those seeking to challenge forfeiture
Cited 0 timesUnknownFREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. LOANCARE, LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 23, 2023
Connally is more than qualified to testify as to the sheer number or errors that she saw in her review process. … Wise was not qualified as an expert or identified as such in the Joint Final Pretrial Order.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 16, 2020
Berardi clearly relied upon the prototype and Ragner’s oral suggestions about alternative methods for building an expandable hose in building his own. … Ragner Technologies attempted to establish an ongoing business relationship with Ed Kelly and Michael Berardi.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 25, 2019
Therefore, Plaintiff has waived all of these clearly untimely arguments. See Tri-M Grp., LLC, 638 F.3d at 434; Laborers’ Int’l Union of N. Am., AFL-CIO v. … Nor is it particularly relevant that “Johns Manville wrote to McDonnell Douglas to advise that it would be dedicating ‘the most qualified personnel in the Thermoflex Department . . . 100% to the McDonnell F4 program’” (
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 12, 2020
In order to establish liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior, a plaintiff must establish: (1) that the wrongdoer is employed by the defendant; (2) acts or omissions causing injuries or damages to others; and … Williams has not alleged facts to establish that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her workspace.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWORTHY v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 8, 2024
racial discrimination claim because he alleges he: (1) belongs to a protected class as an African American (and practices Kemetism, which is a religion observed almost exclusively by other African Americans), (2) was qualified … its vaccination policy when hiring Plaintiff (even if made) were not contractual terms and could not negate Plaintiff’s clearly established at-will employment when [Defendant] changed that policy over a year later.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 20, 2023
would be clearly inadequate to prevent irreparable harm. … “The failure to establish any element ... renders a preliminary injunction inappropriate.” NutraSweet Co. v. Vit–Mar Enters., Inc., 176 F.3d 151, 153 (3d Cir. 1999).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 13, 2024
Rule 23(c)(2) requires notice that clearly and concisely state[s] in plain, easily understood language: (4) the nature of the action; (ii) the definition of the class certified; (ii) the class claims, … Class Counsel are well versed in the applicable legal issues and are qualified to represent the Class. Regarding the second prong, there is no conflict of interest between the named parties and the Class.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRAINFOREST DISTRIBUTION CORP v. VYBES L.A. LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 31, 2021
The Napster court noted “[u]nder clearly established New York law, ‘[o]nce an agreement has been rescinded, there can be no claims based on the cancelled agreement unless the right to make such claims is expressly or impliedly … First, Vybes’s claims for compensatory and consequential damages qualify as economic loss. Spring Motors Distribs., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownC. J. HESSE, INC. v. AMERICAN FAMILY HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 25, 2025
This is illustrated most clearly in a chart contained in the Insurance Policy which sets out the definitions of the various kinds of auto coverage available: Description Of Covered Auto Designation … Defendant, urging that the term “is not intended to, and does not, include any auto in the world,” argues that ““‘any auto’ refers only to any vehicle which would otherwise qualify for coverage under one of the categories
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 23, 2026
Here, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s counsel is sufficiently “qualified” and “experienced” to prosecute this action. Carrow, 2019 WL 7184548, at *9. … That, however, is rebutted by the record, which clearly indicates Defendants intended to (and did) send the Clermont Postcard Report to Venning. See Abramovitz Tr. at 17–18.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 10, 2023
First Step - Prima Facie Case To establish a prima facie discrimination claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate that she (1) is a member of a protected class; (2) was qualified for and performing … Plaintiff contends that the “timing alone [] establishes pretext.” Plf. Opp. at 17.
Cited 0 timesUnknownST. PAUL PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SIMALA
District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 30, 2024
The movant bears the burden of establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … The Appellate Division rejected this argument, holding that the existence of a severability clause did not affect the clearly worded exclusion in that case.
Cited 0 timesUnknownZHANG v. GAIN CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey · May 25, 2021
“[T]he party resisting application of a forum selection clause . . . bears a heavy burden under Atlantic Marine” of establishing the forum selection clause should not be enforced. … Plaintiff argues the Customer Agreement did not provide adequate notice of the clause because it does not qualify as enforceable clickwrap. (ECF No. 24 at 15.)
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna