Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

1.18s

  • DEERING v. HACKENSACK BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 11, 2021

    Cowell v. Palmer Twp., 263 F.3d 286, 292 (3d Cir. 2001) (quoting West v. Philadelphia Elec. Co., 45 F.3d 744, 755 (3d Cir. 1995); c.f. Carroll v. Delaware River Port Auth., No. … See O'Connor v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ELMO v. WOODBRIDGE BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 7, 2021

    Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Woodbridge Board of Education’s motion to dismiss the Complaint. D.E. 14. … Defendant, the Woodbridge Board of Education, denied Plaintiff’s request. Id. ¶ 82.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • GAYLES v. HILLSIDE BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 11, 2022

    See Montana v. … As for the Board itself, a school board can be liable under Section 1983 for a constitutional violation “if it occurred as a result of a policy or custom established or approved by that entity.” L.S. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atlantic City

    158 F. Supp. 2d 438 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 27, 2001

    Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 277 (3d Cir.1990); see also Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370 , 1374 n. 1 (6th Cir.1987); Hamer v. … See Lewis v. Brown & Root, Inc., 711 F.2d 1287, 1292 (5th Cir.1983), clarified on reconsideration, 722 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.1984). Browning, 931 F.2d at 344-45 . Accordingly, I must determine at what point in time Mr.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re New York, S. & W. R.

    36 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 14, 1940

    Ry. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362 , 60 S.Ct. 968 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 . … Co. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362 , 60 S.Ct. 968 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • V. v. CHERRY HILL BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 21, 2025

    Defendant contends that Plaintiffs erroneously apply the “catalyst theory” of fee recovery, which was expressly rejected by the Supreme Court in Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103, 111 (1992) (citations omitted); accord P.N. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • FERNANDEZ v. BOARD OF PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 12, 2021

    See Martino v. Pemberton Township Board of Education, et al., 16-9456 (RMB). … See Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • L.B. v. ROSELLE BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 14, 2021

    In fact, Counts Three and Four are asserted only against defendant Roselle Board of Education. (Consol. Compl. ¶¶ 110-18.) … (citing Emerson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Woods v. New Jersey Department of Education

    796 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 19, 1992

    Kruelle at 693 ; accord Brown v. Wilson County School Board, 747 F.Supp. 436, 441-445 (M.D.Tenn.1990); B.G. By F.G. v. Cranford Board of Education, 702 F.Supp. 1140 , 1156-1157 (D.N.J.1988); McKenzie v. … David D. v. Dartmouth School Committee, 775 F.2d 411, 424 (1st Cir.1985); Field v. Haddonfield Board of Education, 769 F.Supp. 1313, 1325 (D.N.J.1991); see also Carey on Behalf of Carey v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • NORMAN v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 2, 2021

    West v. … App’x 71 ,72 (3d Cir. 2011); Madden v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 438 F.2d 1189, 1190 (3d Cir. 1971); Niblack v. New Jersey State Parole Bd., No. 17-1977, 2017 WL 2106128, at * 2 (D.N.J. May 15,2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DOE v. HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 29, 2025

    (Board Moving Br. 6-7.) … Doe v. Mercy Catholic Med.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • SANCHEZ v. ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 23, 2020

    ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION, NICHOLAS S. … This Court has consistently held that a public-school Board of Education qualifies as “public entity” under the meaning of the NJTCA. See, e.g., Williams v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ESPOSITO v. RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 12, 2021

    Dantinne v. Brown, No. 17-0486 (JHR/JS), 2017 WL 2766167, at *2 (D.N.J. June 23, 2017) (citing City of Atlantic City v. Trupos, 201 N.J. 447, 462 (2010)); see also United States v. … Carlyle Towers Condominium Ass’n v. Crossland Sav., FSB, 944 F. Supp. 341, 345 (D.N.J. 1996); see also Carreno v. City of Newark, 834 F. Supp. 2d 217, 224 (D.N.J. 2011) (holding same).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ESPOSITO v. RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 1, 2021

    Gutierrez v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 01-CV-5302, 2002 WL 34717245, at *3 (D.N.J. Aug. 13, 2002) see also Bayer AG v. … See Caver v. City of Trenton, 192 F.R.D. 154, 159 (D.N.J. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MARINO v. WESTFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 3, 2020

    The Superintendent recommended and the School Board approved Ms. Mamary’s recommendation. Id. 50, 54. … Superintendent, who then makes recommendations to the School Board. Jd. fff 15-16. Marino v. Indus. Crating Co., 358 F.3d 241, 247 (3d Cir. 2004) (quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 255)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MADISON BOARD OF EDUCATION v. S.S.

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 4, 2020

    But in R.L. v. Miami-Dade County School Board, 757 F.3d 1173 (11th Cir. 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a nearly identical argument. … The Eleventh Circuit concluded that the board’s argument “misses the mark.” Id. at 1185.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • STOKES v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 7, 2025

    STATE PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS, et al., Defendants. … On September 27, 2021, Judge Hillman concluded that plaintiff’s claims were barred by Heck v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • G.W. v. RINGWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 17, 2020

    OPINION Ringwood Board of Education, Defendant. … Elbeco Inc. v. Nat’l Ret. Fund, 128 F. Supp. 3d 849, 854 (E.D. Pa. 2015) (quoting Moore v. Angie’s List, Inc., 118 F. Supp. 3d 802, 806 (E.D. Pa. 2015)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • E.O. v. TEANECK BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 7, 2020

    Before this Court is Defendant Teaneck Board of Education’s (“TBE” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) Plaintiffs E.O. … D.K. v. Roseland Board of Education, 903 F. Supp. 797 (D.N.J. 1995) is distinguishable because the court was faced with a different issue: whether a defendant school district was properly dismissed by the ALJ below.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WOMBLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 18, 2024

    Premier Comp Sols., LLC v. UPMC, 970 F.3d 316, 319 (3d Cir. 2020). … Koplove v. Ford Motor Co., 795 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir. 1986); accord First Bank of Puerto Rico v. Misite, 813 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.