Case law

S. ROTONDI & SONS, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH

District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 16, 2024

The resolution awarding the 2023 contract qualifies, as do Rotondi’s 2020 complaint and the judicial opinion, both of which are discussed below. … Within this flexible standard, certain categories of conduct are considered to “clearly” cross the line, including “conduct that is fraudulent . . . and thereby interferes with a competitor’s economic advantage.”

Signet Media, Inc. v. LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 10, 2025

The Court does consider Plaintiff’s failure to clearly distinguish between the two Defendants as relevant to Counts III and IV, for reasons discussed infra. … information falling within [the] categories [Plaintiff articulates] may very well include trade secrets, there is a fair probability that many of the categories – and perhaps all of them – also include information that does not qualify

Grupo Protexa, S.A. v. All American Marine Slip

753 F. Supp. 1217 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 16, 1991

Clearly, AAMS could not respond to a telex in advance of its receipt. Guerrero Script at 4. … In opposition, defendant asserts that the cases which have interpreted the phrase “compulsory by law” have clearly established a balancing test of reasonableness in which three factors — -the likelihood of exposure, the sanctions

ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. NORTHEAST MOUNTAIN GUIDING, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 30, 2020

Third, “a chronic, life-threatening auto-immune disease” hospitalized Vulpis shortly before he filed the Application, and he was “not sure [he] would live through” the year, “much less have any revenues in NMG.” … As discussed earlier, genuine issues of material fact remain concerning whether Manchester qualified as an employee or an independent contractor. See part III.B., supra.

GRANT INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ISAACMAN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 30, 2022

By November 2018, Grant had established a basic process and procedure to produce the green elastomer. (Id. ¶ 71.) … Grant responded that from the outset the parties had clearly agreed that Grant would own the technology and be the only assignee of any resulting patent or patent application. (Id. ¶ 73.)

SOPHIA v. DECKER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2020

The Court notes, however, that these conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19. … In this regard, the Court notes that his conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19.

KEATON v. ARGO TURBOSERVE CORPORATION

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 31, 2021

However, it is unclear whether the Employment Contract covered the deferment of bonuses and whether such deferments qualify as a “reasonable business expense.” … By contrast, here, it is evident that Plaintiff made the complaint, and his objections clearly concerned the allegedly hazardous conditions at ATC’s subsidiary. See id.

BARNEBOUGLE v. DECKER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2020

The Court notes, however, that these conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19. … In this regard, the Court notes that his conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19.

TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2024

For that reason alone the patent for the drive mechanism does not qualify for listing in the Orange Book as claiming the Lantus SoloSTAR. . . . … The statute and regulations clearly require that only patents that claim the drug for which the NDA is submitted should be listed in the Orange Book.

ROSEDALE AND ROSEHILL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION v. TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 30, 2020

Because Defendants’ Resolution clearly denies Plaintiff’s application under subsection (a) as well as (d), see Def. SUMF, ¶ 12; Def. … So construed, I regard this provision as clearly constitutional.”).

HERNANDEZ v. DECKER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2020

The Court notes, however, that these conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19. … In this regard, the Court notes that his conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19.

NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. K&K CONTRACTORS LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 30, 2022

) ' The Complaint does not clearly allege when the unpaid contributions accrued. … It further clarifies that K&K was established in 2010, purportedly lending credence to Plaintiffs’ alter-ego theory. (See id. § 4.)

BRG HARRISON LOFTS URBAN RENEWAL LLC v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 5, 2021

According to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Thomas Edison established a light bulb factory in Harrison, New Jersey in 1882. … AMEC is clearly correct. The positions, responsibilities, and conduct of EWMA and AMEC, as alleged in the 3PC, are very different.

ROSKO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 8, 2025

ESTABLISHING ELIGIBILITY FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS A claimant may establish disability under the Social Security Act by proving they are unable to “engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any … The instant case is clearly distinguishable on the record.

PORTILLO v. DECKER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2020

The Court notes, however, that these conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19. … In this regard, the Court notes that his conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19.

ELKHIER v. DECKER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2020

The Court notes, however, that these conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19. … In this regard, the Court notes that his conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19.

PISANI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 31, 2023

At Step Three, Judge Tirrell determined that Todd did not have “an impairment or combination of impairments” that qualified under the Administration’s listed impairments. … at 20-21 (citing Exs. 3F, 5F, 6F, 10F).)* Todd also argues that Judge Tirrell should have found the B Criteria were met because “the Plaintiffs ability to interact with others is clearly to an extreme

MAYER v. AETNA INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 21, 2023

Under Rule 23(b)(1)(A), a class qualifies for certification if “inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class members [] would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing … May 14, 2008) (“The fact that some plaintiffs may be successful in their suits against a defendant while others may not is clearly not a ground for invoking Rule 23(b)(1)(A).” (citation omitted)).

KING v. ETHICON, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 29, 2022

Based on citations to medical literature, she alleges that the polypropylene mesh used in the TVT “is biologically incompatible with human tissue and promotes an immune response,” which causes “degradation of the pelvic … Other Negligence Theories In her Opposition, Plaintiff highlights allegations in the negligence count that purportedly qualify as alternative theories upon which she bases her negligence

CRUZ v. DECKER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2020

The Court notes, however, that these conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19. … In this regard, the Court notes that his conditions are less established comorbidities for COVID-19.