Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

1.67s

  • Matter of Stevens

    476 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 16, 1979

    Brown v. Felsen, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); cf. Matter of Ross, 602 F.2d 604, 605-608 (3d Cir. 1979). … But see Jessup v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re Industrial Office Bldg. Corp.

    108 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 17, 1952

    V. … Landis v. Western Pacific R. Co., 133 Pa. 579 , 19 A. 556, 558 ; see also Keane v. Moffly, 217 Pa. 240 , 66 A. 319, 320 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • BLANCHE

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 27, 2026

    Instead, petitioner argues that he “was not previously afforded a bond hearing, and even if one is available now, that hearing does not cure the infringement, and if he is unsuccessful, the Board of Immigration Appeals … Jelani B. v. Anderson, No. 20–cv– 06459, 2020 WL 5560161, at *2 (D.N.J. Sept. 17, 2020) (citing Duvall v. Elwood, 336 F.3d 228, 233–34 (3d Cir. 2003)). 10.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • KYAM v. HUDSON COUNTY JAIL

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 9, 2020

    Inmates v. Lanzaro, 834 F.2d 326, 347 (3d Cir. 1987); Atkinson v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997) (holding that the plaintiff must show a “direct causal link between the municipal action and the deprivation of federal rights”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Taylor v. Heckler

    608 F. Supp. 1255 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 16, 1985

    Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 747 F.2d 878, 880 (3d Cir.1984) (citing legislative history). … See also Dawson v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • ROSEDALE AND ROSEHILL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION v. TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 30, 2020

    Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, Fla., 368 U.S. 278, 279 (1961); Lanzetta v. … .”); State v. State Board of Health, 67 N.J.L. 463 (1902) (holding that the Health Board acted properly in hearing an appeal to a municipal decision under subsection (a)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Aversa v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

    672 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 2, 1987

    See Atkins v. … of Regents of State Colleges v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • TOKIO MARINE AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY v. JAN PACKAGING

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 3, 2020

    .: 17-cv-7491 (KSH) (CLW) Plaintiff, v. … Prods. v. China Nat’l Metals & Minerals Imp. & Exp. Corp., 596 F. Supp. 2d 842, 849 (D.N.J. 2008) (Brown, J.); see also FTC v. Preferred Platinum Services Network, LLC, 2010 WL 3883403, at *2 (D.N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hollus v. Amtrak Northeast Corridor

    937 F. Supp. 1110 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 20, 1996

    Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 107 N.J.L. 409 , 153 A. 268 (N.J.1931), aff'd, 109 N.J.L. 264 , 160 A. 537 (N.J.1932); Borough of Roselle v. Lehigh Valley R. … Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 64 N.J.Super. 479, 485 , 166 A.2d 597 (App.Div.1960) (holding that N.J.Stat.Ann. § 48:12-49 evidences legislative intent to give the Public Utility Board jurisdiction to act in protecting the

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • TINSLEY v. MAIN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2019

    There is no record evidence of a complaint to the Newark Board of Psychologists. … 9, 2014 and October 7, 2014 letters from the State Board of Psychological Examiners.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fine v. City of Margate

    48 F. Supp. 3d 772 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 26, 2014

    In Vincitore v. … In Schwartz v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Lehigh Valley R. Co. of New Jersey

    141 F. 192 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 23, 1905

    In Olson v. Oregon Coal & Navigation Co. (D. … In Halverson v. Nisen, Fed. Cas. No. 5,970, the negligence disclosed was that of a mate.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SHERROD v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 16, 2023

    Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). … Thus, Plaintiff Brown must only adequately plead facts supporting a redhibition claim.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Block v. Seneca Mortgage Servicing

    221 F. Supp. 3d 559 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2016

    The statute creates a private right of action against debt collectors who fail to comply with its provisions. 15 U.S.C. § 1692k; Marx, 133 S.Ct. at 1171 n. 1; Brown v. Card Serv. … Langley, 2014 WL 7336787 , at *3 (citing Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., 464 F.3d 450 , 453-54 (3d Cir. 2006)).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Mahoney v. Burkhardt

    299 F. Supp. 787 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 7, 1969

    In Scott v. … McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 674-675 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). There are no doubts whatsoever about New Jersey’s power to provide permanent constitutional reapportionment for its citizens.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • ESPINOZA-MARIN v. GARLAND

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 8, 2023

    Petitioner seeks “review by this Court of the final Order of Removal entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals on March 27, 2023.” Jd. at 1. … See, e.g., Hamilton v. AG of the United States, 241 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • EDWARDS v. GAHM

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 6, 2019

    COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 1:13- cv-07731-NLH; EDWARDS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY 3:13-cv-06523-PGS; EDWARDS v. V.C.C.B. BOARD MEMBERS et al. 1:13-cv-03635-NLH-JS; EDWARDS v. … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Arthur Imerman Undergarment Corp. v. LOCAL 162, ETC.

    145 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 11, 1956

    Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCord, 1914, 233 U.S. 157, 163 , 34 S.Ct. 550 , 58 L.Ed. 893 ; Montana Power Co. v. United States, D.C.N.J.1954, 121 F. … In Bernhardt v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gupta v. Perez

    101 F. Supp. 3d 437 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 27, 2015

    Chao v. … .”); Venkatraman v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. San Clemente Financial Group Securities, Inc.

    174 F.R.D. 572 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 25, 1997

    See Aman v. Cort Furniture Rental Corp., 85 F.3d 1074, 1080-81 (3d Cir. 1996); Kowalski v. L & F Products, 82 F.3d 1283, 1288 (3d Cir.1996); Meyer v. … Stated differently, it is against bank policy to use brokered funds, and only under extreme circumstances would the board change this policy. (P1. Br. ex. 1).

    Cited 121 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.