Case law

STOKES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 19, 2023

In Coady v. Vaughn, 251 F.3d 480, 484–85 (3d Cir. 2001), the Third Circuit held that state prisoners cannot challenge a state parole board decision through a § 2241 petition. E.g., Nathaniel Parks v. … Apr. 8, 2022); Stokes v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., No. 21-18035, 2022 WL 464604, at *1 (D.N.J. Feb. 15, 2022); Neri v. Mid State, No. 13-4555, 2014 WL 575458, at *2 (D.N.J. Feb. 11, 2014); see also Thomas v.

KYAM v. HUDSON COUNTY JAIL

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 17, 2019

Estelle v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997) (holding that the plaintiff must show a “direct causal link between the municipal action and the deprivation of federal rights”).

Beener v. LaSala

813 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 5, 1993

See, e.g., Victor Hotel Corp. v. FCA Mortgage Co., 928 F.2d 1077, 1083 (11th Cir.1991); Oliver v. … Corp. v.

Filtrator Apparatus Co. v. Food Enterprises, Inc.

491 F. Supp. 566 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 20, 1980

E. g., New Wrinkle v. John L. Armitage & Co., 238 F.2d 753, 757 (3d Cir. 1956), Redel’s Inc. v. General Electric Co., supra at 100, City of Mishawaka, Indiana v. … General Electric Company, 498 F.2d 95, 99 (5th Cir. 1974), Gaines v. Carollton Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc., 386 F.2d 757, 759 (6th Cir. 1967), Fox Midwest Theatres, Inc. v.

HEARD

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 22, 2026

Under New Jersey law, a board of education has the authority to suspend or expel a pupil. N.J. Stat. Ann. § 18A:37-5. … Hoag v. Brown, 935 A.2d 1218, 1230 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s IIED claim against the BOE and the District must be dismissed with prejudice.

Wade v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

746 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 17, 1990

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); see Hersh v. Allen Prods. Co., 789 F.2d 230 , 232 (3d Cir.1986); Lang v. New York Life Ins. Co., 721 F.2d 118, 119 (3d Cir.1983). … Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267, 272 , 300 A.2d 563 (1973).

Church & Dwight Co. v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

873 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 23, 1994

Brown at ¶ 13. … Id. at V 21. 2 .

Hemmerle v. Hobby

114 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 2, 1953

And as Judge Chase, speaking for the 2nd Circuit in the matter of Walker v. … This view of the law was borne out by the 9th Circuit in United States v. Lalone, 152 F.2d 43 and by the 8th Circuit in Social Security Board v. Warren, 142 F.2d 974 .

Jaden Electric v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 334

508 F. Supp. 983 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 27, 1981

National Labor Relations Board, 191 F.2d 642, 644 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 869 , 72 S.Ct. 110 , 96 L.Ed. 653 (1951). … In this Circuit, the court in Consolidated Express v.

ALSAIDI v. HUBERT

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 26, 2024

Defendant, Wolfgang Puck Catering and Events, LLC (“Wolfgang Puck”), through mutual agreements, is the holder of a liquor license issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Liquor Control Board, permitting the … Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co., 906 A.2d 571, 575–76 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006) (quoting Phillips v. Cricket Lighters, 841 A.2d 1000, 1008 (Pa. 2003)).

LUENSE v. KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 24, 2021

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … Count Two is dismissed as to the Board of Directors and the individual members of the Board. Count Three is dismissed.

Fass v. Roos

184 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 2, 1960

Cline v. Frink Dairy Co., supra; Fenner v. Boykin, supra, Ex parte Young, supra. … The latest reported three judge federal decision presenting the federal view on this subject is England v. Louisiana State Board, etc. et al., D.C.E.D.La.1960, 180 F.Supp. 121, 124 .

Ogden v. Celebrezze

211 F. Supp. 558 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 14, 1962

Flemming, 263 F.2d 875 (7th Cir., 1959); Folsom v. O’Neal, 250 F.2d 946 (10th Cir., 1957); Ferenz v. Folsom, 237 F.2d 46 (3rd Cir., 1956); Thompson v. … Social Security Board, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 154 F.2d 204 ; Pagelow v. Flemming, 189 F.Supp. 671 (D.C.N.J.1960); McGrew v. Hobby, 129 F.Supp. 627 (D.C.Kansas, 1955); Hemmerle v. Hobby, 114 F.Supp. 16 (D.C.N.J.1953).

Suburban Trails, Inc. v. New Jersey Transit Corp.

620 F. Supp. 1383 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 1985

Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), it has been clear that the provisions of the Sherman Act do not apply to the regulatory activities of the states. … See Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 601 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2699 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Connor v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

736 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 12, 1990

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Johnsrud v. Carter, 620 F.2d 29, 33 (3d Cir.1980). … In Hannah v.

BARCLAYS SERVICES, LLC v. ADEMUWAGUN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 3, 2024

Brown, Esq. (“Brown Decl.”), Declaration of Kavitha K. R (“KKR Decl.”), and Declaration of Oliver Hoad (“Hoad Decl.”). … Jd. § 21; Brown Decl., Ex. 8 at 64. Ademuwagun replies “T did..I have accepted the offer...” Jd.

August v. Department of Homeland Security

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 26, 2019

Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 494-95, 500 (1973); see also Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 699 (2001). B. … See, e.g., Id.; Telson O. v. Nielsen, No. 19-3351, 2019 WL 4601525, at *3 (D.N.J. Sept. 23, 2019); Boyd v. Taylor, No. 17-3284, 2017 WL 4316098, at *2-3 (D.N.J. Sept. 28, 2017); Jones v.

United States v. Certain Parcels of Land

30 F. Supp. 525 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 22, 1939

This letter was received December 29, 1936, and on that evening “Independent’s” Board of Directors passed a resolution authorizing its officers to accept the “offer” of the government, and John J. … See Hoagland v. Latourette et al., 2 N.J.Eq. 254; McVoy v. Baumann et al., 93 N.J.Eq. 638, 117 A. 725 .

BTG Int'l Ltd. v. Amneal Pharm. LLC

352 F. Supp. 3d 352 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2018

Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc. , 229 F.3d 1120 , 1130 (Fed. Cir. 2000) ); see also Pro-Mold & Tool Co. v. Great Lakes Plastics, Inc. , 75 F.3d 1568 , 1573 (Fed. … "The parties to an appeal to the Board may not appeal to the U.S.

SCALERCIO-ISENBERG

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 26, 2026

(citing Brown v. Pa. R.R. Co., 282 F.2d 522, 527 (3d Cir. 1960).) The Court need not address these arguments as it construes the motion differently and denies the motion on other grounds. … Johnson v. Diamond State Port Corp., 50 F. App’x 554, 560 (3d Cir. 2002) (citing Max’s Seafood Café v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999)); L. Civ.