Case law

Klein v. Wilson & Co.

7 F.2d 772 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 11, 1925

Commonwealth v. Browne, 1 S. & R. 385; People v. Richardson, 4 Cow. [N. Y.] 102, note; State v. Hardie, 1 Iredell Law [23 N. C.] 42, 48; State Bank v. State, 1 Blackf. [Ind.] 267, 272 [12. Am. Dec. 234]; State v. … Attorney General v. Utica Insurance Company, 2 Johns. Ch. [N. Y.] 370, [371], 377; People v. Jones, 18 Wend. [N. Y.] 601; State v. West Wisconsin Railway Company, 34 Wis. 197, 213 ; State v.

Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center v. Sullivan

183 F.R.D. 135 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 29, 1998

See Glenmede Trust Co. v. Thompson, 56 F.3d 476, 483 (3d Cir.1995); Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 786 (3d Cir.1994); Smith v. BIC Corp., 869 F.2d 194, 199 (3d Cir.1989); Cipollone v. … State of New York v. United States Metals Refining Co., 771 F.2d 796, 802 (3d Cir.1985) (citing Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 536 F.2d 1001, 1006 (3d Cir.1976)); see also Seattle Times Co. v.

State of New Jersey v. Moriarity

268 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 31, 1967

Board of Adjustment, 183 F.Supp. 826 (D.N.J., 1960.) 11 Specifically, in Ford Motor Co. v. Automobile Ins. Co., 13 F.2d 415, 417 (E.D. … Co. v. Stude, 346 U.S. 574 , 74 S.Ct. 290 , 98 L.Ed. 317 (1953); Crivello v. Board of Adjustment, supra, 183 F.Supp. at 827 .

AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC v. SUMMIT FOOTWEAR CO., LTD.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 24, 2021

Plaintiff Aero AG filed a notice of opposition with the PTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) against Summit’s application on October 6, 2014. Id. at ¶ 27. … Inc. v. Brown, 487 F. App'x 758, 761 (3d Cir. 2012); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c).

Rustay v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

775 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 8, 1991

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; Brown v. Hilton, 492 F.Supp. 771, 774 (D.N.J.1980). The burden of showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists rests initially on the moving party. Goodman v. … Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 78 , 58 S.Ct. 817, 822 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938); Howell v. Celotex Corp., 904 F.2d 3, 4 (3d Cir.1990).

Pennwalt Corp. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

434 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 22, 1977

See, International News Service v. … Co. v. J. C.

BARCLAYS SERVICES, LLC v. ADEMUWAGUN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 3, 2024

Brown, Esq. (“Brown Decl.”), Declaration of Kavitha K. R (“KKR Decl.”), and Declaration of Oliver Hoad (“Hoad Decl.”). … Jd. § 21; Brown Decl., Ex. 8 at 64. Ademuwagun replies “T did..I have accepted the offer...” Jd.

EQUIOM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED v. JACOBS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 29, 2021

See Brenner v. … Celotex, 477 U.S. at 324;see also Lujan v.

McCusker v. City of Atlantic City

959 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 16, 1996

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Watters v. City of Philadelphia, 55 F.3d 886, 891 (3d Cir.1995) (citing Pickering v. Board, of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 572 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1736 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968)).

STOKES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 19, 2023

In Coady v. Vaughn, 251 F.3d 480, 484–85 (3d Cir. 2001), the Third Circuit held that state prisoners cannot challenge a state parole board decision through a § 2241 petition. E.g., Nathaniel Parks v. … Apr. 8, 2022); Stokes v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., No. 21-18035, 2022 WL 464604, at *1 (D.N.J. Feb. 15, 2022); Neri v. Mid State, No. 13-4555, 2014 WL 575458, at *2 (D.N.J. Feb. 11, 2014); see also Thomas v.

Filtrator Apparatus Co. v. Food Enterprises, Inc.

491 F. Supp. 566 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 20, 1980

E. g., New Wrinkle v. John L. Armitage & Co., 238 F.2d 753, 757 (3d Cir. 1956), Redel’s Inc. v. General Electric Co., supra at 100, City of Mishawaka, Indiana v. … General Electric Company, 498 F.2d 95, 99 (5th Cir. 1974), Gaines v. Carollton Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc., 386 F.2d 757, 759 (6th Cir. 1967), Fox Midwest Theatres, Inc. v.

Association for Fairness in Business Inc. v. New Jersey

82 F. Supp. 2d 353 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 8, 2000

Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 343 , 97 S.Ct. 2434 , 53 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977); see also New York State Club Ass’n v. … In City of Richmond v. J.A.

ESTATE OF PEGGY CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 26, 2020

McNeil v. United States Postal Serv., 508 U.S. at 111-13; Roma v. … Brown v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth., 350 F.3d 338, 346-47 (3d Cir. 2003). In addition, Dr.

Schwartz v. Judicial Retirement System of NJ

584 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 12, 1984

Further, it would be inappropriate for you to appear at a public meeting as advisor to a board or agency. … Further, it would be inappropriate for you to appear at a public meeting as advisor to a board or agency.

SPORTS ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GOLDKLANG

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 22, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Rather, Stewart's sole contention is that AAPS and the Board owe her a fiduciary duty because she is a member of AAPS. . . .

Beener v. LaSala

813 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 5, 1993

See, e.g., Victor Hotel Corp. v. FCA Mortgage Co., 928 F.2d 1077, 1083 (11th Cir.1991); Oliver v. … Corp. v.

MARDIS v. JACKSON HEWITT TAX SERVICE INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 26, 2019

Specifically, Jackson Hewitt argues that the Oklahoma legislature intended to apply § 6005 retroactively in the wake of the National Labor Relations Board’s 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc. … See 362 N.L.R.B. 1599, 1614 (2015), affirmed in part and reversed in part, Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. Natl. Lab. Rel. Bd., 911 F.3d 1195, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Larami Ltd. v. Yes! Entertainment Corp.

244 B.R. 56 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 3, 2000

See United States v. … See Howard Brown Co. v. Reliance Ins. Co., 66 B.R. 480, 482 (E.D.Pa.1986)(general rule is that the court where the bankruptcy case is pending is the proper venue for all related proceedings).

Wade v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

746 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 17, 1990

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); see Hersh v. Allen Prods. Co., 789 F.2d 230 , 232 (3d Cir.1986); Lang v. New York Life Ins. Co., 721 F.2d 118, 119 (3d Cir.1983). … Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267, 272 , 300 A.2d 563 (1973).

Wright v. New Jersey/Department of Education

115 F. Supp. 3d 490 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 14, 2015

Gould Elec., Inc. v. United States, 220 F.3d 169, 178 (3d Cir.2000). 1 *494 IV. DISCUSSION 1. ADEA claim against the Board of Education ! … Mar. 28, 2005) (ruling that the (Camden County Board of Education is an arm of the State of New Jersey).