Case law

Jensen v. United States

743 F. Supp. 1091 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 20, 1990

("Board") to exercise discretion to consider appeals on applications for suspension of deportation, the Board’s failure to exercise discretion, as required by regulation, violated the deportee’s due process rights. … According to the allegations, the Attorney General dictated the decision of the Board by circulating a list of persons whom the Attorney General planned to deport and the Board, knowing of the list, refused to suspend deportation

In Re Lucent Technologies, Inc., Securities Lit.

327 F. Supp. 2d 426 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 19, 2004

Gunter v. … Laufer v.

De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper Corp.

59 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 9, 1945

R.S. § 4886, as amended, 35 U.S.C.A. § 31 ; R.S. § 4920, as amended, 35 U.S.C.A. § 69 ; Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co., supra; Osteen v. Ansco Photoproducts, 2 Cir., 27 F.2d 688 ; Stelos Co. v. … Co. v. Coe, 100 F. 2d 429 , 69 App.D.C. 256 ; Dyer v. Coe, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 125 , 125 F.2d 192 .

Camden Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Bomar Resources, Inc.

719 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 9, 1989

Federal Barge Lines, Inc. v. Granite City Steel, 608 F.Supp. 142, 147-48 (E.D.Mo.1985). Accord O'Donnell Transp. Co. v. … The term F.O.B. vessel, as defined by N.J.S.A. 12A:2-319, means "free on board", that is, that the seller must bear the risk and expense of putting the goods on board the designated vessel.

McDowell v. Borough of Pine Hill

736 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 8, 1990

. § 54:4-3.30a was denied by the Borough and the Camden County Board of Tax Appeals. 10. … Witt v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders, 94 N.J. 422, 430 , 466 A.2d 574 (1983) (citing Kozesnik v. Montgomery Township, 24 N.J. 154, 167 , 131 A.2d 1 (1957)).

Coastal (Bermuda) Petroleum Ltd. v. Naughton

862 F. Supp. 1260 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 27, 1994

Cliffs-Neddrill Turnkey v. … Cliffs-Neddrill Turnkey, 947 F.2d at 88 (quoting Board of Comm’rs v. M/V Farmsum, 574 F.2d 289 , 297 (5th Cir.1978)). In Gosnell v.

Searchlight Horn Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.

261 F. 395 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 22, 1919

A. 191 ; Brown v. Zaubitz (C. C.) 105 Fed. 242 ; National Hollow B. B. Co. v. Interchangeable B. B. Co., 106 Fed. 703 , 45 C. C. A. 544 ; Young v. Wolfe (C. C.) 120 Fed. 958 ; Pettibone Mulliken Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, 114 Fed. 945 , 52 C. C. A. 559 ; Tompkins v. St. Regis Paper Co., 236 Fed. 221, 225 , 149 C. C. A. 411 .

THIEFFRY v. WALDIS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 30, 2021

Fowler v. … Sys. v.

SIMON

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 9, 2026

v. … Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc.

Espinosa v. Continental Airlines

80 F. Supp. 2d 297 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 14, 2000

Compare Espinal v. … Similarly, in Boody v.

SAVADJIAN v. CARIDE

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 20, 2019

Partners, LLC v. Decker, 631 F.3d 89, 95 (3d Cir. 2011) (applying factors when finding immunity for members of a state licensing board); Dotzel v. … Keystone, 631 F.3d at 100; see also Brown v. Griesenauer, 970 F.2d 431, 439 (8th Cir. 1992) (“political or electoral pressure alone cannot deprive government officials of absolute immunity”).

In re Admiral Container Corp.

95 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 27, 1951

In Securities and Exchange Comm. v. … Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Co., 1939, 308 U.S. 106 , 60 S.Ct. 1 , 84 L.Ed. 110 ; Mecca Temple of Ancient Arabic Order of Nobles of Mystic Shrine v. Darrock, 2 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 869 .

MORRISON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 12, 2022

Board of Cnty. Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). … (citing Brown v. Foley, 810 F.2d 55, 56 (3d Cir. 1987)).

CHAUDHARY v. PENNEY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 8, 2022

Rhodes v. Marix Servicing, LLC, 302 F. Supp. 3d 656, 661 (D.N.J. 2018) (citing Curley v. Klem, 298 F.3d 271, 276-77 (3d Cir. 2002)). … Buck v. Henry, 207 N.J. 377, 25 A.3d 240 (2011).

PORT DRIVERS FEDERATION 18, INC. v. All Saints Express, Inc.

757 F. Supp. 2d 443 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 18, 2010

Counts I-V.) … U.S. v.

Ferraro v. Bell Atlantic Co., Inc.

2 F. Supp. 2d 577 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 7, 1998

Brown, Jr. entered partial summary judgment in favor of defendant Galbraith and dismissed Counts One, Two, and Three of plaintiffs complaint with prejudice as to Galbraith, relying on this court’s opinion in Tyson v. … London Metals Exchange Inc., 86 N.J. 19, 31 , 429 A.2d 341 (1981); Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55, 82-83 , 389 A.2d 465 (1978).

GRANT v. SLATTERY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 29, 2022

Randy Heller, President of the Board; Tricia Branch, Vice President of the Board; Kathleen Amster, Vice President of the Board; Aldo Patruno, member of the Board; Jessica Piernik, member of the Board; Christina Russotto … In that connection, the parties do not disagree that school board meetings are traditionally categorized as limited public forums. See Davison v. Rose, 19 F.4th 626, 635 (4th Cir. 2021); Ison v. Madison Loc. Sch.

The Board of Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825 Pension Fund et al. v. Delaware Valley Crane Rental, Inc. et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 2, 2026

Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. QIP Holder LLC, No. 06-1710, 2009 WL 5184404, at *4 (D. Conn. Dec. 23, 2009); see, e.g., Lithuanian Com. Corp. v. … See Morel v.

ADAMS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 26, 2024

Petitioner is challenging the statute the New Jersey State Parole Board (“Parole Board” or “Board”) relied upon to deny his parole and set a 180–month future eligibility term (“FET”). (Id. at 7–9.) … The Appellate Division rejected this argument and affirmed the Parole Board’s decision on April 6, 2018. Adams v. New Jersey State Parole Bd., No. A-2508-15T2, 2018 WL 1660076, at * 2 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.

Kirincich v. Standard Dredging Co.

27 F. Supp. 219 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 19, 1939

In the case of Buecker v. … Co. v. Foreman, 4 Cir., 244 F. 353 , and sets forth a long quotation, alleged to have been taken from the opinion in that case.