Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,737 results
1.03s
189 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 9, 1960
In the present case, as in that of Hopkins v. … Zink v. Lear, 1953, 28 N.J.Super. 515 , 101 A.2d 72 ; State ex rel. Kincaid v. State Parole Board 1959, 53 N.J.Super. 526 , 147 A.2d 817 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedSociedad Brasileira De Intercambio Comercial E Industrial, Ltda. v. S. S. Punta Del Este
135 F. Supp. 394 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 13, 1955
Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 806 . … Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line, supra. The respondents rely on the following cases: Wm. H. Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line, supra; Cerro de Pasco Copper Corp. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHotung v. Cargo of a Crate Containing Nine Boxes of Documents Shipped Aboard the M/V Hanjin Nagoya
452 F. Supp. 2d 564 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 7, 2006
Co. v. … Johnson Products Co., Inc. v. M/V La Molinera, 628 F.Supp. at 1241 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY v. MOHAPATRA
District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 28, 2020
Gruntal & Co. v. Steinberg, 843 F. Supp. 1, 16 (D.N.J. 1994) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Guille v. … Plaintiff cannot demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits because of these factual disputes.”); Riley v. Brown, No. 06-331, 2006 WL 842437, at *5 (D.N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 29, 2022
United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 244 (3d Cir. 2006)(quoting United States v. Robertson, 305 F.3d 164, 167 (3d Cir.2002)). There are, however, exceptions to the warrant requirement. … Brown, 448 F.3d at 245. A seizure requires either physical force or, absent force, a show of authority. California v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown55 F. Supp. 3d 552 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 20, 2014
Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) ... … Sample, 885 F.2d at 1118; Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205 (3d Cir.2001)....
Cited 7 timesPublishedArcuri v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates
154 F.R.D. 97 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1994
Brown, Jr. on April 12, 1991, and on April 19, 1991, pursuant to the decree, James F. Flanagan, III, Esquire, was appointed to act as monitor for Local 54. Flanagan subsequently retained Howard S. … American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 524 F.Supp. 1381 (D.C.D.C.1981); the National Labor Relations Board, in NLRB v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. v. MURPHY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 6, 2020
Reply Br. 5-6 (citing Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 70 (1997); Voting Integrity Project, Inc. v. Keisling, 259 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir. 2001); Millsaps v. … Foster, 522 U.S. at 69 (internal citation omitted) (citing Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974); Roudebush v. Hartke, 405 U.S. 15, 24 (1972)); see United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown39 F.2d 489 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 3, 1930
Walter Brown, secretary, and Thomas W. Jack, vice president, of the petitioner. The alleged bankrupt, William H. … Allen v. Allen, 34 N. J. Eq, 493; Toffey v. Atcheson, 42 N. J. Eq. 182, 6 A. 885 ; Hill v. Hill, 95 N. J. Eq. 233, 122 A. 818 , 29 A. L. R. 1242.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSandom v. Travelers Mortgage Services, Inc.
752 F. Supp. 1240 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 20, 1990
In Pao v. … The court found that it had jurisdiction over the unnamed individual doctor who was also a member of the Board of Directors of the hospital, because “notice to the Board of Directors [in the EEOC charge] was notice as to
Cited 32 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 26, 2026
v. … Brown, 2025 WL 3041821, at *3 (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSantosuosso v. NovaCare Rehabilitation
462 F. Supp. 2d 590 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 22, 2006
See Hunt v. Rapides Healthcare System, LLC, 277 F.3d 757 (5th Cir.2001); Brown v. Trans World Airlines, 127 F.3d 337, 342 (4th Cir.1997). … In Brown , the plaintiff conceded on appeal that she had taken leave in excess of that required to be given by the Act and that she never , submitted medical documentation of her illness, as the Act permits employers to require
Cited 20 timesPublished146 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 21, 1956
Schering Corporation moves this Court to- construe its . final order "and decree herein, Brownell v. … Article VI of the Agreement defendant is required to make to applicants for licenses offers to license without qualifications or conditions not appearing in the Agreement, and not contingent upon subsequent decisions by its Board
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · May 18, 2020
Solar Mosaic is Vivint’s co-defendant in a matter in a matter styled Cardona and Brown v. Vivint Solar, U.S.D.C. M.D. Fla. … See Brown v. Vivint Solar, Inc., No. 8:18-cv-02838-SCB-JSS, 2020 U.S. Dist.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSamuel Friedland Foundation v. United States
144 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 24, 1956
In Trinidad v. … Friedland on the board of trustees of the Foundation, B.
Cited 27 timesPublishedProduct Source International, LLC v. Foremost Signature Insurance Co.
234 F. Supp. 3d 619 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 15, 2017
On June 21, 2013, the Trademark Trial Appeal Board granted Nahsh-in’s petition to cancel Plaintiffs registration for the NIC OUT mark. (Id. ¶ 20.) … Plaintiff appealed the Trademark Trial Appeal Board’s ruling to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the “Nahshin Action”). (Id. ¶ 21.)
Cited 4 timesPublishedImhoff-Berg Silk Dyeing Co. v. United States
43 F.2d 836 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 16, 1930
Ed. 627 ; Brown, Adm’x, v. U. S., 113 U. S. 568, 571 , 5 S. Ct. 648 , 28 L. Ed. 1079 . … In Huntley v. Gile & Jenks (C. C. A.) 32 F.(2d) 857, 858 , reversing Gile & Jenks v. Huntley (D.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 8, 2022
agents of the County,” and the “Bergen County Board of Commissioners.” (Id. at ¶¶ 76–78.) … Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62 (2011) (quoting Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997)). A.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWindt v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.
544 F. Supp. 2d 409 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2008
BROWN, JR., Chief Judge. … KPNQwest’s Board’s meetings. See id. ¶¶ 23, 25, 28.
Cited 11 timesPublishedTownship of Marlboro v. Scannapieco
545 F. Supp. 2d 452 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 23, 2008
Accord Curiale v. … Accord Anderson v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna