Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

1.03s

  • Serio v. Liss

    189 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 9, 1960

    In the present case, as in that of Hopkins v. … Zink v. Lear, 1953, 28 N.J.Super. 515 , 101 A.2d 72 ; State ex rel. Kincaid v. State Parole Board 1959, 53 N.J.Super. 526 , 147 A.2d 817 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sociedad Brasileira De Intercambio Comercial E Industrial, Ltda. v. S. S. Punta Del Este

    135 F. Supp. 394 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 13, 1955

    Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 806 . … Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line, supra. The respondents rely on the following cases: Wm. H. Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line, supra; Cerro de Pasco Copper Corp. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hotung v. Cargo of a Crate Containing Nine Boxes of Documents Shipped Aboard the M/V Hanjin Nagoya

    452 F. Supp. 2d 564 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 7, 2006

    Co. v. … Johnson Products Co., Inc. v. M/V La Molinera, 628 F.Supp. at 1241 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY v. MOHAPATRA

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 28, 2020

    Gruntal & Co. v. Steinberg, 843 F. Supp. 1, 16 (D.N.J. 1994) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Guille v. … Plaintiff cannot demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits because of these factual disputes.”); Riley v. Brown, No. 06-331, 2006 WL 842437, at *5 (D.N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • SYMS v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 29, 2022

    United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 244 (3d Cir. 2006)(quoting United States v. Robertson, 305 F.3d 164, 167 (3d Cir.2002)). There are, however, exceptions to the warrant requirement. … Brown, 448 F.3d at 245. A seizure requires either physical force or, absent force, a show of authority. California v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thomas v. Adams

    55 F. Supp. 3d 552 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 20, 2014

    Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) ... … Sample, 885 F.2d at 1118; Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205 (3d Cir.2001)....

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Arcuri v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates

    154 F.R.D. 97 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 1994

    Brown, Jr. on April 12, 1991, and on April 19, 1991, pursuant to the decree, James F. Flanagan, III, Esquire, was appointed to act as monitor for Local 54. Flanagan subsequently retained Howard S. … American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 524 F.Supp. 1381 (D.C.D.C.1981); the National Labor Relations Board, in NLRB v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. v. MURPHY

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 6, 2020

    Reply Br. 5-6 (citing Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 70 (1997); Voting Integrity Project, Inc. v. Keisling, 259 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir. 2001); Millsaps v. … Foster, 522 U.S. at 69 (internal citation omitted) (citing Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974); Roudebush v. Hartke, 405 U.S. 15, 24 (1972)); see United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Morgan

    39 F.2d 489 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 3, 1930

    Walter Brown, secretary, and Thomas W. Jack, vice president, of the petitioner. The alleged bankrupt, William H. … Allen v. Allen, 34 N. J. Eq, 493; Toffey v. Atcheson, 42 N. J. Eq. 182, 6 A. 885 ; Hill v. Hill, 95 N. J. Eq. 233, 122 A. 818 , 29 A. L. R. 1242.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sandom v. Travelers Mortgage Services, Inc.

    752 F. Supp. 1240 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 20, 1990

    In Pao v. … The court found that it had jurisdiction over the unnamed individual doctor who was also a member of the Board of Directors of the hospital, because “notice to the Board of Directors [in the EEOC charge] was notice as to

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • SPEIGEL

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 26, 2026

    v. … Brown, 2025 WL 3041821, at *3 (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Santosuosso v. NovaCare Rehabilitation

    462 F. Supp. 2d 590 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 22, 2006

    See Hunt v. Rapides Healthcare System, LLC, 277 F.3d 757 (5th Cir.2001); Brown v. Trans World Airlines, 127 F.3d 337, 342 (4th Cir.1997). … In Brown , the plaintiff conceded on appeal that she had taken leave in excess of that required to be given by the Act and that she never , submitted medical documentation of her illness, as the Act permits employers to require

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Brownell v. Schering Corp.

    146 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 21, 1956

    Schering Corporation moves this Court to- construe its . final order "and decree herein, Brownell v. … Article VI of the Agreement defendant is required to make to applicants for licenses offers to license without qualifications or conditions not appearing in the Agreement, and not contingent upon subsequent decisions by its Board

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • LITTLEJOHN v. VIVINT SOLAR

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 18, 2020

    Solar Mosaic is Vivint’s co-defendant in a matter in a matter styled Cardona and Brown v. Vivint Solar, U.S.D.C. M.D. Fla. … See Brown v. Vivint Solar, Inc., No. 8:18-cv-02838-SCB-JSS, 2020 U.S. Dist.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Samuel Friedland Foundation v. United States

    144 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 24, 1956

    In Trinidad v. … Friedland on the board of trustees of the Foundation, B.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Product Source International, LLC v. Foremost Signature Insurance Co.

    234 F. Supp. 3d 619 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 15, 2017

    On June 21, 2013, the Trademark Trial Appeal Board granted Nahsh-in’s petition to cancel Plaintiffs registration for the NIC OUT mark. (Id. ¶ 20.) … Plaintiff appealed the Trademark Trial Appeal Board’s ruling to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the “Nahshin Action”). (Id. ¶ 21.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Imhoff-Berg Silk Dyeing Co. v. United States

    43 F.2d 836 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 16, 1930

    Ed. 627 ; Brown, Adm’x, v. U. S., 113 U. S. 568, 571 , 5 S. Ct. 648 , 28 L. Ed. 1079 . … In Huntley v. Gile & Jenks (C. C. A.) 32 F.(2d) 857, 858 , reversing Gile & Jenks v. Huntley (D.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • REEVES v. HEMSLEY

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 8, 2022

    agents of the County,” and the “Bergen County Board of Commissioners.” (Id. at ¶¶ 76–78.) … Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62 (2011) (quoting Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997)). A.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Windt v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.

    544 F. Supp. 2d 409 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2008

    BROWN, JR., Chief Judge. … KPNQwest’s Board’s meetings. See id. ¶¶ 23, 25, 28.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Township of Marlboro v. Scannapieco

    545 F. Supp. 2d 452 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 23, 2008

    Accord Curiale v. … Accord Anderson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.