Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,737 results
1.36s
175 F. 440 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 14, 1910
They were commenced before a Board of Commissioners. There were pleadings and parties, and the claimant was plaintiff, and the United States was defendant. … See, also, United States v. Meyer (D. C.) 170 Fed. 983 ; United States v. Schurr (D. C.) 163 Fed. 648 ; United States v. Wayer (D.
Cited 23 timesPublished865 F. Supp. 2d 606 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 4, 2012
United States v. Badaracco, 954 F.2d 928, 939 (3d Cir.1992) (quoting United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1521-22 (11th Cir.1988)). … United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJACKSON v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 20, 2020
JAMES BROWN and TERRI BROWN, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-17984 … Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 19-15152; Plaintiffs’ motion, D.E. 6, is granted in Brown, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownStudent Public Interest Research Group v. Monsanto Co.
727 F. Supp. 876 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 31, 1989
My reluctance is premised upon the same concern raised by Judge Brown in SPIRG v. … Moreover, as Judge Brown stated in SPIRG v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 28, 2024
Plaintiff contends that DCPP Caseworker Suni Brown (“Brown”) was part of DCPP’s investigation of Plaintiff between August 2020, and February 2021. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 7, 43.) … See Williams v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown799 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 5, 1992
See Bradley v. Pittsburgh Board of Education, 913 F.2d 1064, 1079 (3d Cir.1990) (“Title VII does not preempt section 1983, and ... discrimination claims may be brought under either statute, or both”). … Ruder, 685 F.Supp. 1269, 1279 (D.D.C.1988) ("plaintiff and other women were for obvious reasons reluctant to voice their displeasure” about sexual harassment); Snodgrass v. Brown, No. 89-1171 (D.Kan.
Cited 9 timesPublished223 F. Supp. 2d 596 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 27, 2002
Hill v. Board of Educ. of Middletown Twp., 183 N.J.Super. 36, 39 , 443 A.2d 225 (App.Div1982); see also Iaconianni v. New Jersey Turnpike Auth., 236 N.J.Super. 294, 298 , 565 A.2d 1084 (App.Div.1989). … Section 1985 does not itself create any substantive rights, but rather “creates a cause of action under rather limited circumstances against both private and state actors,” Brown v.
Cited 92 timesPublished358 F. Supp. 2d 400 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 2, 2005
See E.B. v. … Moreover, the Board of Immigration Appeals apparently did not consider this element of the Texas statute to be dispositive, as the Board dropped the “lawfulness” requirement from the final expression of its holding.
Disagreed with in part by Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent, 417 F.3d 408 (2005)Cited 6 timesPublishedPERFORMANCE SCREEN SUPPLY, LLC v. RYONET CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 31, 2023
v. … While Moor stills serves as the Chairman of Ryonet’s Board of Directors, Ryonet has three other directors on its board. Cd. at 46.) The Board holds annual meetings and keeps records of the meetings. (/d.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownMariniello v. Shell Oil Company
368 F. Supp. 1401 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 11, 1974
As stated in McCulloch v. … See also, Brown, “Franchising: Fraud, Concealment and Full Disclosure,” 33 Ohio St.L.J. 517 (1972); Brown & Cohen, “Franchise Misuse,” 48 Notre Dame Lawyer 1145 (1973); Caine, “Termination of Franchise *1404 Agreements: Some
Cited 3 timesPublished129 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 10, 1955
Browning King Co. of New York v. Browning King Co., 3 Cir., 176 F.2d 105 ; Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co., 3 Cir., 175 F.2d 795 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 847 , 70 S.Ct. 88 , 94 L.Ed. 518 ; Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. … Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 29, 2024
Vestberg, who is alleged to be a board member of Verizon Wireless and/or Cellco Partnership. (D.E. … No. 6 (noting that service was made at 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster New Jersey 07921); Compl. at 5 (noting that Verizon Wireless’s address is 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster New Jersey 07921)); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCONSUMERS OIL CORP. OF TRENTON NJ v. United States
188 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 23, 1960
A similar argument was properly rejected by the Board of Tax Appeals in the Appeal of L. A. Thompson Scenic Railway, 2 B.T.A. 664 . Accord. Wayne Title & Trust Co. v. … Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 195 F.2d 401 ; Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10 Cir., 43 F.2d 78 , 76 A.L.R. 1063 ; Woff-ington Body Co. v. Smith, D.C., 99 F. Supp. 788 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedClaridge House One, Inc. v. Borough of Verona
490 F. Supp. 706 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 2, 1980
See Garden State Farms, Inc. v. Bay, supra, 77 N.J. at 450 , 390 A.2d 1177 ; Overlook Terrace Management Corp. v. Rent Control Board of West New York, 71 N.J. 451, 461 , 366 A.2d 321 (1976); Township of Little Falls v. … See, e. g., Segal Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 134 N.J.Super. 421 , 341 A.2d 667 (App.Div.1975) (per curiam). The court simply holds that the defendant’s ordinance is preempted by state law. 1 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedDam Things From Denmark v. Russ Berrie & Co.
173 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 3, 2001
Doe v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 199 F.3d 146, 154 (3d Cir.1999) (quoting American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. … See Doe v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 199 F.3d 146, 154 (3d Cir.1999).
Reversed on other grounds by Dam Things From Denmark, A/K/A Troll Company Aps v. Russ Berrie & Company, Inc., 290 F.3d 548 (2002)Cited 4 timesPublishedApplewhaite v. S. S. Sunprincess
136 F. Supp. 769 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 13, 1956
The goods on board the vessel were not owned by Saguenay. They were being carried by Saguenay under what might be termed subcharter arrangements with third parties. … Humble v. Hunter, 12 Q.B. 310, 317.
Cited 2 timesPublished669 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 9, 1987
In United States v. … (quoting from United States v. Brown, 495 F.2d 593 , 597 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 965 , 95 S.Ct. 226 , 42 L.Ed.2d 179 (1974)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedLAUTO v. DOVER PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 16, 2023
Brubaker Kitchens, Inc. v. Brown, 280 F.App’x 174, 185 (3d Cir. 2008). … Gaiardo v. Ethyl Corp., 835 F.2d 479, 484 (3d Cir. 1987); see Mirabella v. Diversified Glob. Graphics Grp., No. 17-02030, 2018 WL 2012902, at *4 (D.N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · May 13, 2026
NEALS, District Judge Before the Court is Defendants Newark Board of Education (“Board” or “District”) and Eagle Academy for Young Men of Newark’s (“Eagle Academy” … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownFarbenfabriken Bayer, A. G. v. Sterling Drug, Inc.
148 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 5, 1957
The force and effect of the Joint Resolution is fully discussed in the excellent opinion by Judge Swaim in the case of Ladue & Co. v. … Johnson v. Browne, 205 U.S. 309, 321 , 27 S.Ct. 539, 542 , 51 L.Ed. 816 ; see also United States v. Lee Yen Tai, 185 U.S. 213 , 22 S.Ct. 629 , 46 L.Ed. 878 ; Whitney v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna