Case law

Ocean City Ass'n v. Headley

62 N.J. Eq. 322 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 26, 1901

Grey, V. C. … Mulligan v. Jordan, 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 363; Roberts v. Scull, 13 Dick. Ch. Rep. 401.

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Ritz Holding Co.

126 N.J. Eq. 148 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 9, 1939

Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 86 N.J. Law 592 , 597 ; United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 100 N.J. Law 131 . … See Holmes v. Holmes, supra; MacDonnell v. Vitille, supra.

Winkle v. Van Houten

3 N.J. Eq. 172 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1834

In order to show that the construction of the residuary clause Is perfectly well settled, the case of Keeling v. Brown, 5 Vesey, 359, is cited; but the principle of that decision is not in point. … The case of Hassell v.

Boorum v. Tucker

51 N.J. Eq. 135 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893

Little and Telford v. Brown, 2 Leigh 353 . … In Hoagland v. Watt, 2 Sandf. Ch. 148 (V. C.

Allen v. Distilling Co. of America

87 N.J. Eq. 531 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 22, 1917

They were for valuable considerations, were authorized by the board of directors and ratified and approved by the stockholders of the Distilling Company. … Riggin v. Magwire, 15 Wall. 549 ; Dunbar v. Dunbar, 190 U. S. 340 ; Conklin v. United States Shipbuilding Co., 136 Fed. Rep. 1006; 143 Fed. Rep. 631; In re Pettingill, 137 Fed. Rep. 143; People v.

Eureka Fire Hose Co. v. Eureka Rubber Manufacturing Co.

69 N.J. Eq. 159 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 12, 1905

Shaver v. Heller, &c., Co., 108 Fed. Rep. 821, 823; Menendez v. Holt, 128 U. S. 514, 521 (1888). … In Cellular Clothing Co. v. Maxton, App.

Cutting v. Dana

25 N.J. Eq. 265 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1874

This court, in Furman v. Clark, 3 Stockt. 306, entertained a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of chattels— clay to be delivered on board the complainant’s boats at Amboy. Stevens v. Wilson, 3 C. E. … Co. v. Bartlett, 5 Cush. 224 ; Pots v. Whitehead, 5 C. E. Green 55; Williams v. Williams, 17 Beav. 213; Dowell v. Dew, 1 Y. & C. C. B. 345; Thornbury v. Bevill, Id. 554; Eliason v. Henshaw, 4 Wheat. 225 ; Brisban v.

Wolfstern v. Pennsylvania Railroad Voluntary Relief Department

76 N.J. Eq. 78 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 31, 1909

Donald v. C. B. and Q. R. R. Co. (1395), 93 Iowa 284 ; 33 L. R. A. 492, 496; Johnson v. Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Co. (1894), 163 Pa. 127 ; 29 All. Rep. 854. … Eq. (2 Dick.) 39; reversed, Id. 563; American Legion of Honor v. Perry, l40 Mass. 590, 592; Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. Connolly, 58 N. J. Eq. (13 Dick.) 180.

Gaines v. Green Pond Iron Mining Co.

32 N.J. Eq. 86 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

Bagot v. Bagot, 32 Beav. 509 ; Legge v. Legge, 32 Beav. 515. … Clavering v. Clavering, 2 P. Wms. 388 ; Spencer v. Scurr, 31 Beav. 334.

Willink v. Morris Canal & Banking Co.

4 N.J. Eq. 377 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1843

The cases cited on the argument fully establish this proposition, and it will foe seen by the case of Stillwell v. … In Van Vechten and Sebring v. Terry and others, 2 John.

McGahan v. United Engineering Corp., Inc.

118 N.J. Eq. 410 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 10, 1935

At that time the board of directors adopted a resolution to further amend paragraph Fourth of the certificate of incorporation, and subsequently filed a certificate of such amendment; which amendment made paragraph Fourth … Law 119 , and O'Hara v. National Biscuit Co., 69 N.J. Law 198 . Assuming this contention to be correct, ( cf. Vernam v. Scott, 12 N.J. Mis. R. 177 ) it seems clear that complainant clearly is within the limitation.

McCartin v. Traphagen

43 N.J. Eq. 323 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1887

Tichenor v. Hayes, 12 Vr . 193; Dodd v. Wilkinson, 14. Stew. Eq. 566. … Smith v. Clay, reported in a note to Deloraine v. Brown, 3 Bro. C. C. 639, [.Amb. 645].

Cliffside Park v. Progressive

122 N.J. Eq. 109 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 7, 1937

Ass'n v. Edwards, supra. … Ass'n v. Edwards, supra; Vliet v. Cowenhoven, 83 N.J. Eq. 234 , 90 Atl. Rep. 681 ; Jackson Trust Co. v. Gilkinson, 105 N.J. Eq. 116 , 146 Atl. Rep. 658 ; Home Owners' Loan Co. v. Collins, supra; Chichi Lombardo Bldg.

Melick v. Cross

62 N.J. Eq. 545 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 11, 1902

. *398, *402; Burrell v. Brown, 1 Jac. & W. *169 (1820). … Ibid.; Freeman v. Bissell, 63 N. Y. 168 (1875).

Siegman v. Maloney

63 N.J. Eq. 422 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 25, 1902

Pitney, V: C. … See the language of Lord Campbell and Lord Brougham in Burnes v. Pennell, 2 H. L. Cas. 497 (1849), and of Lord Campbell in Regina v. Brown, 7 Cox C. C. 442, which was an indictment.

Patterson v. J. D. Loiseaux Lumber Co.

92 N.J. Eq. 569 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 25, 1921

Saldutti v. Flynn, supra; King v. Ruckman, 21 N. J. Eq. 599; Haughwout v. Murphy, 22 N. J. Eq. 53 1. … Insurance Co. v. Marshall, 32 N. J. Eq. 103; Armstrong v. Ross, 20 N. J. Eq. 109; Perrine v. Newell, 49 N. J. Eq. 57; Cf., also Wilson v. Brown, 13 N. J. Eq. 277.

In re Thompson

85 N.J. Eq. 221 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1915

But, even assuming it to be void, proceedings under the act are undoubtedly valid according to the doctrine of Lang v. *258 Bayonne, 74 N. J. Law 455. See, also, In re Public Utility Board, 83 N. J. … Paterson and Hudson Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 9 N. J. Eq. 434: “This cause was referred by the chancellor to George H. Brown, one of the masters of the court.

Gevas v. Greek Restaurant Workers' Club

99 N.J. Eq. 770 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 11, 1926

July 6/26 ..... 192 To the Executive Board Lunchroom Cafeteria Delicatessen Workers, Dear Sir and Brothers, We, the men working at the Essex Restaurant on Broad St. … In Gompers v.

Attorney-General ex rel. city of Elizabeth v. Central Railroad

68 N.J. Eq. 198 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 16, 1904

Emery, V. C. … Pr. (6th ed.) *11, citing Attorney-General v. Cockermouth Local Board, L. R. 18 Eq. Cas. 172; Grey, Attorney-General, v. Greenville and Hudson Railroad Co., 59 N. J. Eq. (14 Dick.) 372, and cases cited at p. 378 (1900).

Keavey v. Barrett

62 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 4, 1901

Other cases are Wilson v. Hill, 2 Beas. 143; Fenton v. Reed, 4 Johns. 52 ; In the matter of Taylor, a Lunatic, 9 Paige 611 ; Campbell v. Campbell, L. R. 1 H. L. Cas. (Sc. … The learned judge also quoted Judge Cowen, in the ease of Starr v. Peck, 1 Hill 270 ; Judge Clerke, in the case of Caujolle v. Ferrie, 26 Barb. 177 , and Judge Andrews, in the case of Hynes v. McDermott, 91 N.