Case law

Rhodes v. Ries

99 N.J. Eq. 638 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 10, 1926

v. … Eq. 451 ; Condit v. Blackwell, 22 N.J. Eq. 481 ; Porter v. Bergen, 54 N.J. Eq. 405 ; Wagner v. Phillips, 78 N.J. Eq. 33 .

Donath v. Shaw

132 N.J. Eq. 545 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 21, 1942

In Stout v. Hart ( 1801 ), 7 N.J. … Blackstone, 3 Watt. 335 ( Pa., 1834 ); Pope v. Hinchley, 209 Mass. 323 ; 95 N.E. Rep. 798 ( 1911 ); Stout v. Hart, supra; Doughty v. Stillwell, 1 Bradford 300 ( N.Y. Sup Ct., 1850 ); Skipwith v.

Ferry v. Laible

31 N.J. Eq. 566 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1879

Peace v. Spierin, 2 Desauss. 460; Short v. Battle, 52 Ala. 456 ; Sampson v. Williamson, 6 Tex. 102 . Contra, Marvin v. Smith, 56 Barb. 600 ; Head v. Temple, 4 Heisk. 34 ; Leavitt v. Pell, 25 N. Y. 474 > Hoggatt v. … The court may sometimes authorize a mortgage of lands in order to pay debts or legacies [Selby v. Cooling, 23 Beav. Ifl8 ; Holme v. Williams, 8 Sim. 667; Williamson v. Meld, 2 Sandf. Gh. 633 ; see, however, Brown v.

New York & Eastern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Great Eastern Telephone Co.

74 N.J. Eq. 221 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 2, 1908

Garrison, V. C. … Reprint 1222; Clegg v. Edmondson, 8 De G. M. & G. 787; 44 Eng. Reprint 593; Rule v. Jewell, 18 Ch. Div. 660 (1881); Garden Gully Mining Co. v. McLister, L. R. 1 App. Cas. 39; *232 Sayre v.

Phraner v. Stone

137 N.J. Eq. 284 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1945

Brown, 43 N.J. Law 37 . It seems quite plain to me, however, that this question is controlled by the general rule and not by any of the recognized exceptions. … V.

White v. White

60 N.J. Eq. 104 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 23, 1900

The authorities in support of this position in this state are Garnsey v. Mundy, 9 C. E. Gr. 243; Mulock v. Mulock, 4 Stew. Eq. 594; Martling v. Martling, 2 Dick. Ch. Rep. 122; Hall v. Otterson, 7. Dick. Ch. … Rep. 522, and Lovett v. Taylor, 9 Dick. Ch. Rep. 311. The older authorities are collected in Garnsey v. Mundy and Mulock v. Mulock. The latter ease is peculiarly applicable here.

Burke v. Gunther

128 N.J. Eq. 565 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1941

Lutjen v. Lutjen, 64 N.J. Eq. 773 ; *Page 575 53 Atl. Rep. 625 ; Soper v. Cisco, 85 N.J. Eq. 165 ; 95 Atl. Rep. 1016 ; Massie v. Asbestos Brake Co., 95 N.J. Eq. 298 ; 126 Atl. Rep. 669 ; Wilson v. Stevens, 105 N.J. … Robeson v. Robeson, 50 N.J. Eq. 465 ; 26 Atl. Rep. 563 ; Dixon v. Bentley, 68 N.J. Eq. 108 ; 59 Atl. Rep. 1036 ; Thompson v. Williamson, 67 N.J. Eq. 212 ; 58 Atl. Rep. 602 ; Hill v. Hill, 79 N.J. Eq. 521 ; 82 Atl.

Mills v. Central Railroad

41 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1886

Carson v. Coleman, 3 Stock. 106 ; Boston &c. R. R. v. Salem &c. R. R., 2 Gray 1 ; Mills on Em. Dom. § 128. … In Branch v. Jesup, 106 U.

Guaranty Trust Co. v. N.Y. Community Trust

141 N.J. Eq. 238 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 29, 1948

Justice Swain in Ould v. … First Camden, c., Trust Co. v. Collins, supra; Martin v. Haycock, 140 N.J. Eq. 450 ; 55 Atl. Rep. 2d 60.

Wildes v. Rural Homestead Co.

53 N.J. Eq. 425 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1895

Cook Stockh. § 684- In Ellerman v. Chicago Junction Railway &c. Co., 4 Dick. Ch. … In Elkins v. Camden and Atlantic Railroad Co., 9 Stew.

Matthews v. Hoagland

48 N.J. Eq. 455 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1891

Wheatley v. Williams, 1 Mees. & W. 533; Robson v. Kemp, 5 Esp. 53; Brard *465 v. Ackerman, 5 Esp. 111; Coveney v. Tannahill, 1 Hill 33 ; Brandt v. Klien, 17 Johns. 338 ; Brown v. Payson, 6 N. H. 443; Gray v. … *492 5n the estate (Wood v. Brown, 34 N. Y. 337 ), as explained in Burt v. Burt, 41 N. Y. 46 . This case is, that John H.

Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Harloff

133 N.J. Eq. 44 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1943

Scudder v. Vanarsdale, 13 N.J. Eq. 109 , 113 ; Fluke v. Fluke, supra; Cook's Executor v. Cook's Administrator, 20 N.J. Eq. 375 , 377 ; Hand v. Marcy, 28 N.J. Eq. 59 , 65 ; Clark v. Denton, 36 N.J. … Denton v. Clark, 36 N.J. Eq. 534 ; Brown v. Fidelity Trust Co., 82 N.J. Eq. 323 ; 87 Atl. Rep. 222 ; Isenburg v. Rose, 99 Atl. Rep. 615 ; Cranstoun v. Westendorf, 91 N.J. Eq. 34 ; 108 Atl. Rep. 776 ; Triplett v.

Harrall v. Wallis

37 N.J. Eq. 458 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1883

S.) 143; see White v. Brown, 1 Wall. Jr. 217 ; or absence abroad for the purpose of obtaining an education, Von Hoffman v. Ward, 4 Red/. %44; Rice's Case, 7 Daly %% ; Kelly v. … Y. 157 ; Kendall v. Coons, 1 Bush 530 ; Parrott v. Nimmo, 28 Ark. 351 ; Oraycroff v. Morehead, 67 N. C. 422 ; see Bond v. Cummings, 70 Me. 125 ; Smith v. McAtee, 27 Md. 420 ; Sands v.

Hewitt v. Crane

6 N.J. Eq. 159 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1847

Corey v. … Kinchant v. Kinchant, 1 Brown’s Ch. C. 369, was a family settlement, and was sustained by Justice Gould, who sat for Lord Thurlow.

Kelly v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.

106 N.J. Eq. 545 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 5, 1930

The court is without authority to substitute its judgment for the judgment of the board of directors. … In Brundred v.

McVickar v. McVickar

46 N.J. Eq. 490 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1890

And again, in Laing v. Laing, 6 C. kE. … And see Marker v. Marker, 3 Stock. 256 .

Holmes v. Stout

10 N.J. Eq. 419 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1855

Harrison v. Forth, Prec. in Ch. 51; 2 Fonb. Eq. B. 2, ch. 6, § 2; Lowther v. Carlton, 2 Atk. 242; Ferrars v. Cherry, 2 Vern. 383; Mertins v. Jolliffe, Amb. R. 313; Sweet v. Southcot, 2 Brown’s Ch. R. 66 ; McQueen v. … In Flagg v.

Bridgeton Nat. Bank v. Commercial, C., Co.

117 N.J. Eq. 371 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 27, 1934

The resolution of the board of directors of Eastern States recited in the assignment was adopted March 2d 1929. … Portuguese-American Bank v. Welles, 242 U.S. 7 ; 61 L.Ed. 116 ; Burnett v. Jersey City, 31 N.J. Eq. 341 ; United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Newark, 76 N.J. Eq. 230 .

Vandoren v. Todd

3 N.J. Eq. 397 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 15, 1836

In Mackreth v. … In Gilman v.

McMichael v. Webster

54 N.J. Eq. 478 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1896

Pitney, V. C. … With regard to the use and occupation of the premises, I hold that it is a mere matter of offset, and cannot come in here under the ruling of the court of errors and appeals in Coriell v. Brown, 5 Dick. Ch.