Case law

Booraem v. North Hudson County Railway Co.

44 N.J. Eq. 70 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1888

H. 427; Smith v. Craig, 8 Overt. 289 ; Smith v. McCall, 2 Humph. 165 ; but see Sanders v. Ward, 25 Ga. 131 ; Leavitt v. Morrow, 6 Ohio St. 78 ; Callender v. Keystone Ins. Co., 23 Pa. St. 475; Baring v. … Gilchrist, 15 Johns. 110 ; Davey v. Turner, 1 Dall. 14 ; Lloyd v. Taylor, 1 Dall. 17 ; Troup v. Haight, Hopk. Ch. 251; Brown v. Farran, 3 Ohio 155 ; Chesnut v. Shane, 16 Ohio 608 ; Manchester v.

Fidelity Trust Co. v. Baker

60 N.J. Eq. 170 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 4, 1900

Emery, V. C. … Stephens v. Board of Education, 79 N. Y. 183 (1879); Justh v. National Bank of Commonwealth, 56 N. Y. 478 ; Hatch v. National Bank, 147 N. Y. 184, 191, 192 ; Nassau Bank v. National Bank of Newburgh, 159 N.

W.D. Cashin Co. v. Alamac Hotel Co., Inc.

98 N.J. Eq. 432 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 25, 1925

Our board met to-day and I read your letter to them. … See, also, McMichael v. Horay, 90 N.J. Law 142 ; Goekel v. Erie Railroad Co., 2 N.J. Adv. R. 1591; 126 Atl. Rep. 447 ; Margolies v. Goldberg, 3 N.J. Adv. R. 188; 127 Atl. Rep. 271 .

Inhabitants of Township v. Watters

61 N.J. Eq. 284 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 7, 1901

Eor an instructive explanation of O'Connor v. Spaight, see Southeastern Railway Co. v. Brogden, 3 McN. & G. 8 (at p. 24). An instructive case, though briefly reported, is Cooke v. … Then there is the case of Southampton Dock Co. v. Southampton Board, decided in 1871, reported in L. R. 11 Eq. Cas. 254. There Sir James Bacon, in referring to the case of Southeastern Railway Co. v.

G— v. G—

67 N.J. Eq. 30 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 21, 1903

Pitney, V. C. The record, as it now stands, presents questions of some novelty. … On the contrary, I find the case of Kyle v. Kyle, 52 N. J.

Moresh v. O'Regan

120 N.J. Eq. 534 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 5, 1936

Los Angeles, 189 U.S. 207 ; Tyson and Brother, c., v. Banton, 273 U.S. 418 ; Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 195 U.S. 233 ; Philadelphia Co. v. Stimson, 223 U.S. 604 ; Panama Refining Co. v. … Bodnar v. Board of Health, Carteret, 14 N.J. Mis. R. 318; 184 Atl. Rep. 682 ; City Bank of Bayonne v. O'Mara, 88 N.J. Law 499 ; 97 Atl. Rep. 149 .

Public Service Gas Co. v. Mayor of Newark

86 N.J. Eq. 384 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 20, 1916

Foster, V. C. … The situation presented is quite similar to that in the case of Public Service Corporation v. American Lighting Co. et al., 67 N. J.

Bankers Trust Co. v. Maxson

100 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 26, 1926

In Shaw v. Glen, 37 N.J. … Cropper v. Brown, 76 N.J. Eq. 406 ; Oakley v. Shaw, 69 Atl. Rep. 462 . The defendants have not questioned the bona fides of the sale.

Supp v. Second National Bank Trust Co.

98 N.J. Eq. 242 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 10, 1925

See McCoury v. Leek, supra; Lanning v. Cole, supra; Voorhis v. Otterson, supra. … Considerable stress is put upon the argument in defendants' brief that in the case of Bailey v. Brown, 19 R.I. 669 , 682 ; 36 Atl.

In re Bartles

33 N.J. Eq. 46 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1880

St. 81; see, however, Coleman v. Peed, Walk. 258 ; Sinclair v. Jackson, 8 Cow. 548 ; Gilpin v. Williams, 25 Ohio St. 288 ; Dunn y. Sargent, 101 Mass. 886 ; Shonk y. Brown, 61 Pa. St. 820; Van Tilburgh y. … (Allen v. Scurry, 1 Yerg. 86 ; Hargan v. Biehardson, Hud. 62; Penn v. Spencer, 17 Gratt. 85 ; Watson v. Hodd, 68 N. O. 528; Jackson v. Middleton, 52 Barb. 9 ; Perkins v. Clock, 3 Head 784 ; Allston v.

Central Hanover Bank Trust Co. v. Helme

121 N.J. Eq. 406 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 19, 1937

Soper et al. v. Brown, 136 N.Y. 244 ; 32 N.E. Rep. 768 ; 32 Am. St. Rep. 731 ; In re Durant's Will, 231 N.Y. 41 ; 131 N.E. *Page 422 Rep. 562. This rule of law yields to a very faint glimpse of a different intention. … In Daniel v. Brown, 156 Va. 563 ; 159 S.E. Rep. 209 ; 75 A.L.R. 1377 , the court said: "But the property here did not belong to Jane C.

F.F. East Co. v. United Oystermen's, C., 19600

128 N.J. Eq. 27 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 26, 1940

Rep. 150 ; Brown v. Supreme Council, c., Foresters, 176 N.Y. 130 ; 68 N.E. Rep. 145 , 146 ; Baldwin Lumber Co. v. Local No. 560, International Brotherhood, c., 91 N.J. Eq. 240 ; 109 Atl. Rep. 147 ; McCord v. … Rep. 255 ; Feldman v. Gamble, 26 N.J. Eq. 494 ; Fleckenstein Bros. Co. v. Fleckenstein, 76 N.J. Law 613 ; 71 Atl. Rep. 265 ; Rosenbaum v. U.S. Credit System Co., 65 N.J. Law 255 ; 48 Atl. Rep. 237 ; Fishell v.

Atlantic City Water Works Co. v. Atlantic City

39 N.J. Eq. 367 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1885

In State v. … In State v.

Adams v. Adams

17 N.J. Eq. 324 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1866

Harris v. Harris, 2 Hagg. Eccles. R. 376; Cocksedge v. Coeksedge, 1 Robertson 90; Chettle v. Chettle, 3 Phill. … He then with his wife goes to boarding in New York.

White v. Young's Pier & Hotel Co.

78 N.J. Eq. 498 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 13, 1911

Walker, V. C. … Now, in Atlantic City v.

Continental Securities Co. v. Northern Securities Co.

66 N.J. Eq. 274 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 26, 1904

Bergen, V. C. … L. (2d ed.) 695; Ehle v. Chittenango Bank, 24 N. Y. 548 ; Leland v. Hayden, 102 Mass. 542 .

Knoop v. Bohmrich

49 N.J. Eq. 82 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1891

Bohmrich and his partizans had control of the corporation — they held one hundred and two of the two hundred shares of stock,, and had three votes out of the five in the board of directors. … Ackerman v. Halsey, 10 Stew. Eq. 356, 362; S. C. on appeal, 11 Stew. Eq. 501; Brinckerhoff v. Bostwick, 88 N. Y. 53 , 59; Peabody v. Flint, 6 Allen 52 , 56; Brewer v. Boston Theatre, 104 Mass. 378, 387; Mor.

Doremus v. Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Dutch Reformed Church

3 N.J. Eq. 332 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1835

Demarest, for money advanced by him to Westervelt, eighty-one dollars and twenty-five cents, and four dollars and eighty-six cents interest; and to the complainant, for boarding of hands and work and labor done, sixty dollars … Gluesiions of forfeiture do not appertain to this tribunal: Slee v. Bloom, 5 John. C. R. 377; The Society for the Establishment of Useful Manufactures v. The Morris Canal, &c., Saxton, 157.

Shields v. John Shields Construction Co.

81 N.J. Eq. 286 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 11, 1913

I have recently considered the question in the unreported case of Commonwealth Roofing Co. v. … Board of Education of the City of Newark —a case involving a similar situation — and I see no reason for changing my views on the subject.

Trustees of Princeton University v. Wilson

78 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 10, 1910

Harvard College v. Society, 3 Gray (Mass.) *6 280, 282; Jackson v. Phillips, 14 Allen (Mass.) 539, 579; Lanning v. Commissioners of Public Instruction, 63 N. J. Eq. (18 Dick.) 1, 8; MacKenzie v. … Stephens’ Executors v. Milnor, 24 N. J. Eq. (9 C. E. Gr.) 358, 374; Doe d. York v. Walker, 12 M. & W. 591; Emuss v.