Case law

Thompson v. West

56 N.J. Eq. 660 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 23, 1898

Travelers’ Insurance Co. v. Grant, 9 Dick. Ch. Rep. 212; Corle v. Monkhouse, 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 537. … Greenwod v. Law, 26 Vr. 168 .

Watkinson v. Watkinson

67 N.J. Eq. 142 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 29, 1904

They are Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457 ; Price v. Ward, 25 N. J. Law (1 Dutch.) 225, and other cases cited in Elsasser v. Haines, 52 N. J. Law (23 Vr.) at p. 25; 1 Freem. Judg. §§ 116 -126; Bell v. Bell, 181 U. … In Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.

Hackensack Improvement Commission v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co.

22 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1871

The complainants are a board, constituted by an act approved April 1st, 1868, and their powers enlarged by a supplement, approved March 31st, 1869, and another approved April 6th, .1871. … This doctrine was fully declared and established by the Court of Appeals of this state, in the case of The Morris and Essex Railroad Company v. Prudden, 5 C. E. Green 530.

Morse v. Hackensack Savings Bank

47 N.J. Eq. 279 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1890

Herbert v. Exr. of Tuthill, Sax. 141; Den. v. Snowhill, 3 Zab. 447; Gest v. Flock, 1 Gr. Ch. 108; Fluke v. Exrs. of Fluke, 1 C. E. Gr. 478; Wetmore v. Midmer, 6 C. E. Gr. 242; Leggett v. Doremus, 10 C. E. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, DepUe, Garrison,. ' Mag-ie, Reed, Yan Syckel, Brown, Cole, Smith, Whitaker — 10.

Duffy v. Duffy

19 N.J. Misc. 332 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 9, 1941

Audubon v. Shufeldt, 181 U. S. 578 ; 45 L. Ed. 1009 ; Wetmore v. Marcoe, 196 U. S. 73 ; 49 L. Ed. 390 ; Thompson v. Thompson, supra; Yarborough v. Yarborough, 290 U. S. 226 ; 78 L. Ed. 269 (1933). See, also, Hanson v. … DeBlaquiere v. DeBlaquiere, 3 Hagg. Eccl. 322; 162 Eng. Reprint 1173; Lynde v. Lynde, 64 N. J. Eq. *341 736, 753; 52 Atl. Rep. 694 ; Warren v. Warren, 92 N. J. Eq. 334, 337; 112 Atl. Rep. 729 ; Freund v. Freund, 71 N.

Aller v. Crouter

64 N.J. Eq. 381 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 7, 1903

Hutchinson v. Tindall, 2 Gr. Ch. 357; Smith v. Howell, 3 Stock. 349 ; Newkirk v. Place, 2 Dick. Ch. Rep. 477; Silvers v. Potter, 3 Dick. Ch. Rep. 539; Tynan v. Warren, 8 Dick. Ch. Rep. 313; Jauch v. … Rep. 538; Brown v. Combs, 5 Dutch. 36. There was produced in evidence in this case at least one writing which measures up to the requirements of the statute of frauds.

Wintermute v. Snyder

3 N.J. Eq. 489 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1836

v. … In Willan v.

Lane v. Smythe

46 N.J. Eq. 443 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1890

Pitney, V. C. … App. 307, and Licensed Victualler’s Newspaper Company v. Bingham, L. R., 38 Ch. Div. 139. For the French cases upon this subject, see Browne Tr. M. §§ 415-4-17.

Austin v. Young

90 N.J. Eq. 47 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 20, 1919

These general principles are given recognition in the following decisions in this state: Janes v. Falk, 50 N. J. Eq. 468, 472; Landon v. Hutton, 50 N. J. Eq. 500; Wittingham v. Lighthipe, 46 N. J. Eq. 429; Ownes v. … Whyte v. Arthur, 17 N. J. Eq. 521.

Cocheu v. N.J. General Security Co.

128 N.J. Eq. 64 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 6, 1940

Lutjen v. Lutjen, 64 N.J. Eq. 773 ; 53 Atl. Rep. 625 ; Mealey v. Howard, 79 N.J. Eq. 93 ; 81 Atl. Rep. 1108 ; affirmed, 79 N.J. Eq. 224 ; Pine v. Gardner, 103 N.J. Eq. 69 ; 142 Atl. Rep. 50 ; Chapen v. Wright, 41 N.J. … Justice Trenchard, in speaking for the Court of Errors and Appeals in Soper v. Cisco, 85 N.J.

Stockton v. Mayor of Newark

42 N.J. Eq. 531 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1887

Kurtz, 2 Peters 566 ; Pott v. Pottsville, 4® Pa. St. 132; see Rector <£c. v. Stewart, 2 Sir. 1126; Brown v. Imiheran Church, 23 Pa. St. 495 ; Jeffreys v. Pittsburgh (Pa.), 26 Alb. L. J. 203; nor a church, Sehoonmaker v. … In Montpelier v.

Liberty Title Trust Co. v. Plews

142 N.J. Eq. 493 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1948

Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co., supra. A trustee may not take speculative risks even though motivated by what he feels is to the interest of the estate. In Wild v. Brown, 120 N.J. Eq. 31 ; 183 Atl. … Wild v. Brown, 120 N.J. Eq. 31 ; Babbitt v. Fidelity Trust Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 745 . " The testimony of Mr. Ambler discloses that there were three different stages in the nature and value of these investments.

McCall v. Yard

3 N.J. Eq. 58 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1855

Bishop of Winchester v. Beaver, 3 Ves. 314; Palk v. Lord Clinton, 12 Ves. 58; Sherman v. Cox, Rep. in time of Finch 406, S. C; 3 Ch. Rep. 83, decided in 1674; Griswold v. Marsham, 2 Ch. Ca. 170; Lomax v. … Rep. 89 ; Cripp v. Heath, 7 Vern. § 2, f. 2; Draper v. The Earl of Clarendon, 2 Vern. 317; Hobart v. Abbott, 2 P. Wms. 643; Fell v. Brown, 2 Bro. 276; Needler v. Deeble, 1 Ch. Cas. 299; Gore v.

Red Oaks, Inc. v. Dorez, Inc.

118 N.J. Eq. 198 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 5, 1935

Thropp v. Field, supra; Sparks v. Lorentowicz, supra; Rivoli Holding Co. v. Ulicny, supra. … In Brower v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Asbury Park, 103 N.J. Eq. 176 , the city had declared a forfeiture of a lease and re-entered.

Kastell v. Hillman

53 N.J. Eq. 49 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1894

Justice Rossell, in his opinion in Den v. … Justice Southard, in Den v. Van Cleve, adheres to the original ruling in Den v. Johnson, and also agrees with Chief-Justice Kirkpatrick.

Howard v. Mayor, C., Jersey City

102 N.J. Eq. 213 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 24, 1928

De Veney v. Gallagher, 20 N.J. Eq. 34 . The defendant, under our law, is liable in damages for active wrong-doing. Kehoe v. Rutherford, 74 N.J. Law 659 ; Dohrman v. Freeholders of Hudson, 84 N.J. Law 689 . … Hart v. Leonard, 42 N.J. Eq. 416 .

Mayor of Newark v. Erie Railroad

72 N.J. Eq. 447 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 4, 1907

The bill demurred to sets forth the power of the city of Newark and its board of street and water commissioners to control and regulate public streets and highways in that city, and among others, a street called Summer avenue … Metuchen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., ubi supra.

Macknet's Executors v. Macknet

24 N.J. Eq. 277 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1873

R., in Kennell v. Abbott, 4 Vesey 802, 811. See also, King v. Denison, 1 Vesey & Bea. 260. … In Miller v.

Fidelity, Trust v. Guar. Trust Co., N.Y.

135 N.J. Eq. 222 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 14, 1944

Drummond's Ex'r v. Drummond, 26 N.J. *Page 230 Eq. 234; Trenton Trust and Safe Deposit Co. v. Moore, supra. … Board of Education v. Duparquet, 50 N.J. Eq. 234 ; 24 Atl. Rep. 922 . C.

Linker Realty Corp. v. S.S.C. Realty Co.

115 N.J. Eq. 427 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 5, 1934

Realty Company was represented by his son who was afterward elected a member of the board of directors of that company. … The complainant has cited the case of Liss v. Ward Hamilton , *Page 433 Inc., 104 N.J. Eq. 279 , in support of its claim to priority of lien.