Case law

Attorney-General v. Goetchius

142 N.J. Eq. 636 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 9, 1948

It seeks to set *Page 637 aside a grant of riparian lands in the Borough of Edgewater, Bergen County, made by the Board of Riparian Commissioners and the Governor on September 25th, 1901, to John M. … In the case of Attorney-General v. Sooy Oyster Co., 78 N.J.

Schwarzwalder v. Tegen

58 N.J. Eq. 319 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 8, 1899

Mygatt v. Insurance Co., 21 N. Y. 52 (1860). (The New York statutes seem to have been statutes on which our first General Mutual Insurance Company act of 1852 was based.) Union Insurance Co. v. Hoge, 21 How. 35 . … Meredith v. Zinc and Iron Co., 10 Dick. Ch. Rep. 211, 218; affirmed for reasons stated, 11 Dick. Ch. Rep. 454; Pronik v. Spirits Distributing Co., 42 Atl. Rep. 586 .

Stewart v. Stewart

61 N.J. Eq. 25 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 6, 1900

Welsh v. Brown, 14 Vr. 37 Halsted v. Meeker, 3 C. E. Gr. 136; Hennion v. Jacobus, 12 C. E. Gr. 28; Griggs v. Veghte, 2 Dick. Ch. Rep. 179; Corle v. Monkhouse, 2 Dick. Ch. Rep. 78; Green v. Green, 3 Stew. Eq. 451; S. … Hartson v. Elden, supra; Carter v. Gray, 13 Dick. Ch. Rep. 411.

Leonard v. Bosch

72 N.J. Eq. 131 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 10, 1906

reference to the letters was that he supposed the bridge company to be the owners of the cargo, and in that capacity to be entitled to the benefit of the deposit which they had agreed to make in order to get the cargo on board … Green v. Stone, 54 N. J. Eq. (9 Dick.) 387, 395, &c. (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1896); Herron v. Mullen, 56 N. J. Eq. (11 Dick.) 839 (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1898); Lutjen v. Lutjen, 64 N. J.

Vail v. Newark Savings Institution

32 N.J. Eq. 627 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1880

sums and at such times, and on such terms as the by-laws shall prescribe, which shall be invested accordingly, and shall be repaid to such depositors at such times, and with such interest, and under such regulations as the board … Attorney-General v. Mechanics and Laborers Savings Bank, 5 Stew. Eq. 163. The prayer of the bill, that the institution may be required to secui’e to the complainants the repayment of the fund, and t'o pay to Mrs.

Bajek v. Polack

120 N.J. Eq. 104 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 9, 1936

Lewis, V. C. … Perry & Sons, Inc., v. Mand, 110 N. J. Eq. 111; Board of Education of Elizabeth v. Zinc, 101 N. J. Eq. 78.

American Central Insurance v. Landau

56 N.J. Eq. 513 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 17, 1898

Pitney, V. C. … Cadigan v. Brown, 120 Mass. 493 . The disposition of this court'to uphold this kind of jurisdiction is manifested by rule 132, promulgated by Chancellor.

New Jersey Zinc Co. v. New Jersey Franklinite Co.

13 N.J. Eq. 322 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1861

Harris v. Ryding, 5 Mees & W. 60; Humphries v. Brogden, 12 Queens B. 739; Jeffries v. Williams, 5 Excheq. 792; Smart v. Norton, 5 Ellis & B. 30. … Harris v. Ryding, 5 Mees & W. 69, per Parke, B.; Smart v. Morton, 5 Queens B. 30.

Elkins v. Camden & Atlantic Railroad

36 N.J. Eq. 233 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1882

The cases in which it has been euun *237 dated are Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co., 3 Jur. (N S.) 1117; S. C. on appeal, 1 De G. & J. 606; Crawford v North Eastern Railway Co., 3 Jur. (N. S.) 1093; Sturge v. … M. & G. 158; Matthews v. Great Northern Railway Co., 5 Jur. (N. S.) 284. The doctrine of all these cases, on the point under consideration, was approved in Boardman v.

Forsyth v. Forsyth

46 N.J. Eq. 400 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1890

Van Fleet, V. C. The parties to this suit are the five children of William W. Forsyth, who died on the 1st day of March,' 1872. Four join in asking the aid of the court against the fifth. … balance of my estate to be put out at interest on freehold security, but not upon a second mortgage, or upon premises where there is a prior lien, and the said interest appropriated to the use of my son William, towards his board

Thompson v. Pennsylvania Railroad

48 N.J. Eq. 105 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

Pitney, V. C. … McClure v. Gulick, 2 Harr. 340 ; The State v. Gulick, 2 Harr. 435 ; Den. v. Hendrickson, 3 Harr. 366 . A case more in point is Spokes v. The Banbury Board of Health, L. R. (1 Eq. Cas.) 42, 11 Jur. (N. S.) 1010.

Bijur v. Bijur Motor Appliance Co.

1 N.J. Misc. 218 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 24, 1923

The cases of Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Shaefer Ball Bearing Co., 89 N. J. Eq. 435; Cope v. Walton & Co., 77 N. J. Eq. 512, and Miller v. Gourley, 65 N. J. … These, however, are all cases involving a preference given by a board of directors acting in the performance of their ordinary duties.

Wilson v. State Water Supply Commission

82 N.J. Eq. 32 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 11, 1913

People v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401, 406 ; Cass v. Dillon, 2 Ohio St. 607 , 613; Clark v. City of Janesville, 10 Wis. 136; Bushnell v. Beliot, 10 Wis. 195, 221 ; Pattison v. … In State v.

Smith v. Hunterdon County Mutual Fire Insurance

41 N.J. Eq. 473 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1886

This reasoning is not in conflict with the doctrine established in Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. v. Hillyard, 8 Vr. 444 . … See Carlton v. Southern Mutual Ins. Co., 72 Ga. 371 ; S. C., 18 Rep. 75, and 13 Ins. Law Jour. 565.

Petrie v. Voorhees'

18 N.J. Eq. 285 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1867

In Rex v. … In Winstone v. Linn, 1 B. & Cress. 460, in Phillips v. Clift, 4 Hurlst. & Nor. 168, and Powers v.

Annan v. Hill Union Brewery Co.

59 N.J. Eq. 414 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 10, 1900

In White v. Madison, 26 N. … Titus & Scudder v. Cairo and F. Railroad Co., supra; Stokes v. New Jersey Pottery Co., 17 Vr. 238 .

Clark v. Commercial Trust Co. of N.J.

119 N.J. Eq. 133 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 1, 1935

Rep. 479 ; Sanford v. Pack, 63 Conn. 486 ; 27 Atl. Rep. 1057 ; Chany v. Hotchkiss, 79 Conn. 104 ; 63 Atl. … Rep. 108 ; Chase v. City of Portland, 86 Me. 367 ; 29 Atl. Rep. 1104 ; Welty v. Taylor, 63 Ind. App. 674 ; 115 N.E. Rep. 257 ; City of Chicago v. Farwell, 286 Ill. 415 ; 121 N.E. Rep. 795 ; Consolidated Gas, c., Co. v.

Crews v. United States Car Co.

57 N.J. Eq. 357 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 24, 1899

Honduras Co. v. Board of Assessors, 25 Vr. 278 . … Corrigan v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co., 3 Hal. Ch. 489, 496 (1849); Freeholders of Middlesex County v. State Bank, 2 Stew. Eq. 268, 273 (1878); Minchin v. Second National Bank, 9 Stew. Eq. 436, 442 (1883).

Armstrong v. Ross

20 N.J. Eq. 109 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1869

In Wheaton v. … In Wilson v. Brown, 2 Beas. 277, Chancellor Green held that a mortgage given by a married woman on her separate estate, without her husband joining, was void as a mortgage.

Demott v. Stockton Paper Ware Manufacturing Co.

32 N.J. Eq. 124 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

On the 23d of April, 1878, William V. … See, also, Suydam v. Receivers of the Bank of New Brunswick, 2 Gr. Ch. 114; State Bank at New Brunswick v. Receivers of Bank of New Brunswick, Id. 266, and Kelly v. Neshanic Mining Co., 3 Hal. Ch. 579.