Case law

Rogosin v. City Trust Co. of Passaic

107 N.J. Eq. 79 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 18, 1930

When said account was opened a copy of a resolution adopted by the board of directors of the corporation relating to the withdrawal of funds from said account was filed with the trust company. … In Butler v.

In Re Hague

105 N.J. Eq. 134 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 27, 1929

Kilbourn v. Thompson, supra; State v. Guilbert, 75 Ohio St. 1 ; Greenfield v. Russel, 292 Ill. 392 . … In Boyd v.

Robinson v. Robinson

83 N.J. Eq. 150 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 8, 1914

During the period that the divorce suit was pending and for a considerable time prior thereto, defendant boarded at petitioner’s home; and the divorce suit was obviously brought and the money necessary for its prosecution … In Collins v.

Young v. Vough

23 N.J. Eq. 325 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1873

Wright v. Morley, 11 Ves. 23; Robinson v. Wilson, 2 Madd. 569; Cheesebrough v. Millard, 1 Johns. Ch. 413 ; Hayes v. Ward, 4 Johns. Ch. 130 ; Clason v. Morris, 10 Johns. R. 524; Story’s Eq. Jur., § 638. … But if he did this only to blind such stockholders as objected to his owning more than one hundred shares, or for the purpose of having a pliant tool in the board, he is not estopped; he must have done it for the purpose

Johnson v. Conover

54 N.J. Eq. 333 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896

This seems to have been the ground upon which Mytton v. Mytton, supra, and Page v. Young, supra, were decided. … This doctrine is known as the rule in Greville v. Brown, adopted by the court of appeals in the case of Corwine v. Corwine, 9 C. E. Gr. 579, and followed and explained in Johnson v. Poulson, 5 Stew. Eq. 390.

Ronan v. Barr

82 N.J. Eq. 563 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 8, 1913

Morrow v. Hasselman, 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 612 Bowen v. Smith, 76 N. J. Eq. (6 Buch.) 456; Elliston v. … Gr.) 415; a saw-mill, Duncan v. Hayes & Greenwood, 22 N. J. Eq. (7 C. E. Gr.) 25; a pest-house, State Board of Health v. Trenton, 68 Atl. Rep. 897 .

Huylar v. Cragin Cattle Co.

40 N.J. Eq. 392 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1885

Sickles v. Sharp, 13 Johns. 497 ; Cotheal v. Brouwer, 5 N. Y. 562 . … In Union Bank v.

Breidenbach v. Breidenbach

128 N.J. Eq. 558 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 29, 1941

Krueger v. Armitage, 58 N.J. Eq. 357 ; 44 Atl. Rep. 167 ; Eggers v. Anderson, 63 N.J. Eq. 264 ; 49 Atl. Rep. 578 ; Baird v. Board of Recreation Commissioners, c., 108 N.J. Eq. 91 ; 154 Atl. Rep. 204 . … They lean heavily on the case of Bennett v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 123 N.J. Eq. 198 ; 196 Atl. Rep. 375 . In Bennett v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 122 N.J. Eq. 455 ; 194 Atl.

In Re Sixth Ward B. L. Assn.

134 N.J. Eq. 98 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 5, 1943

The board of directors on March 27th, resolved "that the necessary reserves which have to set set up be recaptured from the surplus or apportioned profits." … Busci v. *Page 102 Longworth Building and Loan Association, 119 N.J. Law 120 ; Veix v. Sixth Ward Building and Loan Association, 123 N.J. Law 356 ; affirmed, 310 U.S. 31 ; 60 S.C. 792 ; Sommer v.

Campana v. Angelini

132 N.J. Eq. 285 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 5, 1942

He remained unmarried and during the six years immediately preceding his death he occupied a room, and perhaps boarded, in the residence of the defendants. … Haydock v. Haydock, supra; Post v. Hagan, supra. Evidently, the grantor well understood the significance of his act and its consequences. Mott v. Mott, supra; Hall v. Otterson, supra; Slack v. Rees, supra.

Groton Savings Bank v. Batty

30 N.J. Eq. 126 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878

In Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. … Van Keuren v. Central R. R. Co. of N. J., 9 Vr. 165 ; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Cutler, 3 Sandf. Ch. 176; Newhall v. Pierce, 5 Pick. 450 ; Scott v. Gallagher, 14 Serg. & R. 333; McCulloh v. Cowher, 5 Watts & S. 427 .

Hankinson v. Hankinson

33 N.J. Eq. 66 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1880

She returned for a day (to get some money to pay her board in Maryland, she says), but did not go to see him, nor inform him, or 'attempt to inform him, in any way, of her presence in Trenton. … Moores v. Moores, 1 C. E. Gr. 275; Bowlby v. Bowlby, 10 C. E. Gr. 406; S. C. on appeal, Id. 570; Belton v. Belton, 11 C. E. Gr. 449; Taylor v. Taylor, 1 Stew. Eq. 207. The petition will be dismissed.

Blanchard v. Blanchard

116 N.J. Eq. 435 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 8, 1934

Carter v. Gray, 58 N.J. Eq. 411 ; Johnson v. Haldane, 95 N.J. Eq. 404 ; Swetland v. Swetland, 100 N.J. Eq. 196 . … Allen v. Allen, 76 N.J. Eq. 245 ; Blundell v. Pope, 21 Atl. Rep. 456 . The case of Merritt v. Merritt, 43 N.J.

Olitsky v. Estersohn

90 N.J. Eq. 459 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 21, 1919

Rep. 16; Stang v. Redden, 28 Fed. Rep. 11; Robertson v. Howard, 229 U. S. 254 ; In re Shea, 126 Fed. Rep. 153, and Davis v. … In Cropper v. Brown, 76 N. J. Eq. 406, this court held that the equitable title passed at the time of the sale and before confirmation.

Condit v. Bigalow

64 N.J. Eq. 504 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 3, 1903

Brown v. Higgs, 8 Ves. 561, 569 (1803); 2 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 1002, and cases cited; 2 Story Eq. Jur. § 1601. … Pickney v. Burrage, 2 Vr. 21 .

McCran v. Erie Railroad

93 N.J. Eq. 286 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 7, 1922

Lewis, V. C. … Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. New York and Long Branch Railroad Co., 23 N. J. Eq. 157; Attorney-General v. East Jersey Water Co., 78 N. J. Eq. 329; Allen v. Jersey City, 53 N. J. Law 522; American Dock, &c., Co. v.

Abele v. Abele

62 N.J. Eq. 644 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 9, 1901

Grey, V. 0. The cause coming on to be heard, the complainant’s counsel refused to move the hearing on the original bill. … That is not the attitude which a husband should take who had abused his wife,-and so frightened her that she had to call in the neighbors, and whose bed and board he had for years forsaken.

Gitomer v. United States Casualty Co.

140 N.J. Eq. 531 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 24, 1947

In Lewis v. … Frank v. Board of Education of Jersey City, 90 N.J. Law 273 ; 100 Atl. Rep. 211 ; 2 C.J. Sec. 1045 and 1062; 2 Amer. Jur. 86.

Ames v. Bank of Nutley

118 N.J. Eq. 228 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 27, 1935

Ames set forth the refusal of the board of directors of the bank to further repurchase the bonds and the reason therefor. … Capron v. Luchars, 110 N.J. Eq. 338 ; affirmed, 112 N.J. Eq. 373 .

Fish v. New York Water Proof Paper Co.

29 N.J. Eq. 16 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878

He was one of the board of directors at that time, and could have answered this statement. He offers no proof on the subject. … Pennock v. Coe, 23 How. 117 . The injunction will be made perpetual.