Case law

Den ex dem. Wagenen v. Brown

26 N.J.L. 196 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1857

Den v. Van Ness, 5 Halst. 102; Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 1 Green’s Ch. R. 356; Woodhull v. Reid, 1 Harr. 128 ; Thompson v. … Cited in Duncan v. Smith, 2 Vr. 329 ; Lamb v. Cannon, 9 Vr. 364 .

Board of Chosen v. Strader

18 N.J.L. 108 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1840

Lord Ellenborough in Rex v. … Turnpike Co. v. Rutler, 4 Serg. and R. 16; Grey v.

Morgan v. Board of Commissioners

104 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 23, 1927

Oil Co. v. Gloucester, 102 N. J. L. 502; Long v. Scott, 133 Atl. Rep. 767 ; Bauer v. Paterson Fire, &c., Commissioners, 102 Id. 235; Wittkop v. Garner, 132 Atl. Rep. 339 . See, also, Larkin Co. v. Schwab, 242 N. … Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow, 134 Atl. Rep. 557 ; Bauer v. Paterson Fire, &c., Commissioners, supra; Wittkop v. Garner, supra; Schait v. Senior, 97 N. J.

Den ex dem. Brown v. Mugway

15 N.J.L. 330 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1836

I need now only refer to the cases there cited in proof of this universal rule, and a subsequent case of Nevison v. Taylor, 3 Halst. 43. Wherefore I am of opinion that judgment of non-suit be entered with costs. … Cited in Den v. Young, 4 Zab. 782 ; Den v. Lake, 1 Dutch. 611.

Board of Police Commissioners v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

117 N.J. 664 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 1989

Probst v. Board of Education

127 N.J. 518 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1992

We have previously recognized the importance of school-board power in this regard. In Board of Education v. … In Cordasco v.

Barney v. Board of Trustees

122 N.J. 168 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 1990

Doben v. Board of Health

3 N.J. Misc. 38 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 31, 1924

A rule to show cause was allowed in this case July 31st, 1924, why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue, compelling the board of health of the city of Paterson and Frederick P. … Section one (1) of said ordinance provides "such permit ma.y be issued by said board of health upon the1 payment of: $25.” The board has a discretion in the matter of issuing or refusing permits.

Brown v. Street Lighting District No. 1

70 N.J.L. 762 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1904

Apgar v. … In Lane v.

State v. Board of Education

58 N.J.L. 347 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

Stat., p. 3060), provides that the legal voters of a school district, either at an annual meeting or at a special meeting called for that purpose, may, by the consent of a majority of those present, authorize the board of … For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Gum-mere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mag-ie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Sims, Smith, Talman. 12.

Nuveen Municipal Trust v. Withumsmith + Brown, P.C.

213 N.J. 527 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 2013

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

91 N.J.L. 97 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917

Weld v. Hornby, 7 East 199; Rex v. Osborne, 4 Id. 327: Keyport Steamboat Co. v. Farmers Co., 18 N. J. Eq. 13; State v. Kelsey, 44 N. J. L. 1; State v. Wrightson, 56 Id. 126; Titus v. … Without' adverting specifically to the conclusions reached by the board of public utility commissioners, we may remark that they are in accord with the views we have reached, and that the order of that board under review

Garber v. Board of Health

4 N.J. Misc. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1926

which time the board undertook to nullify its action. … As to the ordinance of October 8th, that does not change the situation, for it- was an ex post facto ordinance, and not controlling on him or on the board with reference to his license. Reimer v. Dallas, 3 N. J. Adv.

Goodman v. Board of Freeholders

66 N.J.L. 571 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1901

Brown v. New Jersey Short Line Railroad

76 N.J.L. 795 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1908

Por instance, in Benham v. … In the case of Laing v.

Jamouneau v. Local Government Board

6 N.J. 281 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1951

The appeal from the Board to the Appellate Division has been certified to us on our own motion. R. … Newark v. Township of Clinton, 49 N. J. L. 370 (Sup. Ct. 1887); City of Perth Amboy v. Barker, 74 N. J. L. 127 (Sup. Ct. 1906); Essex Co. Park Commission v. State Board, 129 N. J. L. 336 (Sup. Ct. 1943).

State v. Board of Commissioners

59 N.J.L. 146 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896

The act constituted a police and sanitary board, styled as “ The Long Branch Commissioners.” … Randolph v. Wood, 20 Vroom, 85 ; Stahl v. Trenton, 25 Id. 445; Tetrault v. Orange, 26 Id. 99; Loucks v. Bradshaw, 27 Id. 2; Goldberg v. Dorland, Id. 364; Johnson v. Hoover, 29 Id. 334.

OGGAD v. Board of Review

208 N.J. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 2011

27 A.3d 950 (2011) 208 N.J. 336 OGGAD v. BOARD OF REVIEW. Nos. C-63 September Term 2011, 067764 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 22, 2011. Petition for Certification Denied.

State v. Board of Commissioners

50 N.J.L. 565 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1888

State, Ropes, pros., v. Essex Public Road Board, 8 Vroom 335 ; State v. Water Commissioners, 1 Vroom 247 ; State, Hampson, pros., v. Mayor, &c., of Patterson, 7 Vroom 159 ; State, Hoboken Land Improvement Co., pros., v. … Hoboken, 7 Vroom 291 ; State, Wilkinson, pros., v. Inhabitants of Trenton, Id. 499; State, Grant, pros., v. Clark, 9 Vroom 102 ; Bowne v. Logan et al., 14 Vroom 421 .

Vandervalk v. Board of Commissioners

8 N.J. Misc. 741 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 18, 1930

The situation here, as shown by the undisputed facts, is exactly analogous to that before this court in McGonnell v. Orange, 98 N. J.